Detect/stage metastatic disease & follow-upEvaluate primary bone neoplasmsEvaluate inflammatory vs. infectious diseasesEvaluate bone pain in pt with normal radiographsInvestigate unexplained, increased alkaline phosphatase levels (enzyme used by osteoblasts to lay down bone matrix)Assess bone graft viability, infarction or aseptic necrosisAssess prosthetic joints for infection or looseningEvaluation of roentgenologically difficult fractures
2. The SkeletalSystem
• Axial skeleton
• Skull
• Vertebral column
• Thorax
• Appendicular skeleton
• Shoulder girdle
• Arms
• Pelvic girdle
• Legs
A
B
U
a
m
og
r
Pr
T
M
N
5
Review of Skeletal System
10. • Detect/stage metastatic disease & follow-up
• Evaluate primary bone neoplasms
• Evaluate inflammatory vs. infectious diseases
• Evaluate bone pain in pt with normal radiographs
• Investigate unexplained, increased alkaline
phosphatase levels (enzyme used by osteoblasts to
lay down bone matrix)
• Assess bone graft viability, infarction or aseptic
necrosis
• Assess prosthetic joints for infection or loosening
• Evaluation of roentgenologically difficult fractures
NMTProgramUAB
14
Clinical Indications
11. Radiopharmaceutical used
Generic name Chemical name
• Tc-99m medronate
(technetium)
Methylene
Di Phosphonate
(MDP)
• Tc-99m oxidronate HydroxyMethylene
DiphosPhonate
(HDP or HMDP)
NMTProgramUAB
15
Mechanism of uptake - Chemisorption
12. • Pediatrics by weight : Recommended
• 0.25 mCi/kg (pediatric dose)
Young’s rule or Webster’s rule for pediatric dosage
calculation:
Age in years + 1
Age in years + 7
Dosage
NMTProgramUAB
16
Dosage & Administration
X Adult dose
20 – 30 mCi (adult dose) ( 740 –1110 MBq)
15. Patient preparations (afterarrival)
• Identify the patient; verify the
physician’s order; review the clinical
indication for the exam
• Explain exam to patient; obtain
relevant medical history
NMTProgramUAB
19
Technique
16. Relevant Medical
History
• Bone pain
• Trauma/fracture
• Arthritis
• Medications/dietary
supplements
• Surgery
• Malignancies
• Biopsy/pathology
• Radiation/chemotherapy
• Kidney/bladder problems
• Recent dental work
• Chronic health problems
• Other medical imaging
results
• Pregnancy status
• Lab results
NMTProgramUAB
20
Technique
17. Patient Preparation
• Radiopharmaceutica
l clearance depends
on several factors,
including:
• Age
• Renal status
• Ideal wait time:
• 2 to 3 hours post inj
• Immediately before
imaging:
-remove attenuating
materials
- patient should void
NMTProgramUAB
21
Technique
18. Imaging the patient
Use one of the following imaging
techniques:
-Static studies
- Dynamic studies
-Multiphase studies (with 3-phase/
4-phase)
- Tomographic studies (SPECT)
A
B
U
a
m
og
r
Pr
T
M
N
22
Technique
19. Static studies
• Time delay post tracer injection
A
B
U
am
og
r
Pr
T
M
N
23
• Whole body vs limited (“spot” view)
• Preset total counts or time
- Imaging localized concentration of
radiopharmaceutical in the body
Technique
20. Dynamic Studies (Flow)
- Multiple sequential Imaging of
nonlocalized radioactivity in the body
usually yielding functional data
amUAB
og
r
Pr
T
M
N
24
Technique
(as in imaging blood flow, gastric emptying, kidney filtration, etc)
21. Multiphase Studies
• 3-Phase Study
Imaging in the following sequence:
1) Immediate flow dynamic images
2) Early (5-15min) static image(s)
3) Delayed (3-4hr) static image(s)
• 4-Phase Study: 3-phase study plus a 24 hour
delayed image
NMTProgramUAB
25
Technique
23. A
B
U
a
mog
r
Pr
T
M
N
27
Technique
Bone SPECT
(single photon emission computed tomography)
• Multiple planar images taken around
the body (projections)
Planar vs. Tomograp hic
Mathematically reconstructs 3-D volume from
projection data using a computer
25. Bone SPECTContinued…
Advantages & Disadvantages
• Improves lesion detection
• Better localizes abnormality suspected in
planar images
• Most valuable in complex bony structures
• Time consuming
• Patient discomfort
NMTProgramUAB
29
Technique
26. NormalAdult
• Symmetry
• Increased tracer
concentration in the
following areas:
• nasopharynx
• sternum
• shoulder joints
• anterior iliac crests
• Posterior S.I. Joints
• Visualization of
kidneys/bladder
NMTProgramUAB
30
The Normal Scan
27. “Super Scan”
NMTProgramUAB
31
There is minimal soft-tissue
activity and virtually no renal
or bladder activity. This
pattern is indicative of
diffuse bone metastases
and is often referred to as a
superscan.
Also associated with:
-certain metabolic bone
diseases
- abnormally extended delay
before imaging
Radiographics. 2003;23:341-358
28. Normal Child
• Tracer distribution is
age dependent
• In addition to areas listed
for adults, increased activity
also noted in areas of bone
growth:
– epiphyseal plates
– costochondral
junctions
The Normal Scan
NMTProgramUAB
32
29. Bone Scintigraphy – Sensitivity
vs. Specificity
Nuclear medicine bone imaging is very sensitive to
pathologic changes in bone physiology (eg., bone
destruction, changes in perfusion), but it is not
specific for a particular disease.
Greater specificity is achieved by gathering more data
about the patient such as clinical symptoms or the
results of other diagnostic tests.
NMTProgramUAB
33
The Abnormal Scan
30. Bone uptakeprinciples
• Recall that the skeleton undergoes constant
remodeling
• Radiopharmaceutical uptake in the bone is
proportional to blood flow, bone mass, and
metabolic activity
NMTProgramUAB
34
The Abnormal Scan
Pathology: - Increased tracer uptake (“hot spots”)
- Decreased tracer uptake (“cold spots”
or photopenia)
31. Pathology Manifestations
Pathological conditions
causing Increased Uptake
Neoplastic disease
Trauma sites
Metabolic bone disease
Degenerative bone
disease
Inflammatory bone
disease
Pathological conditions
causing Decreased Uptake
Radiation injury
Avascular necrosis
Cyst
Multiple myeloma
Fluid collections
The Abnormal Scan
NMTProgramUAB
35
32. Extraosseous
Activity
• Renal anatomy & abnormalities
• Acute myocardial infarction
• Soft tissue inflammation
• Neoplastic soft tissue tumors
• Normal female breasts
• Amyloidosis
SPECT image shows pedicle uptake to
be more superficial in overlying soft
tissue (arrow). Patient had received
injections of antiinflammatory drugs at
this site a few weeks before scan.
Artifacts & Pitfalls
NMTProgramUAB
36
34. Evaluate images for technical quality
Urine contamination
Attenuation artifacts
Patient positioning
Tracer extravasation (infiltration)
Other artifacts (radiopharmaceutical, equipment, patient)
Artifacts & Pitfalls
NMTProgramUAB
38
Was image acquired at correct time
following tracer administration?
• Check radiopharmaceutical distribution
• Look for soft tissue/bloodclearance
Is the radiopharmaceutical distribution
as expected?
• Normal biodistribution
• Pathology
• Patient preparation
Does the image include all relevant
anatomy?
• Patient/camera positioning
Was the patient positioned correctly?
• Relevant anatomy
• Correct positioning
Were the correct acquisition parameters
used?
• Collimator
• Static vs dynamic
• Total counts, time or framing rate
• Acquisition matrix (spatial resolution)
Are the images displayed and labeled
correctly?
• Format
• Media (film, laser paper, workstation monitor)
Are there any artifacts that need to be explained
or removed (require image to be repeated)?