12. X RAY EXAMINATION
AP X Ray of Shoulder for Clavicle in standing
position - gravity – max deformity
Chest Radiograph – Compare with opp. Clavicle for
any shortening
-- assoc. injury to Rib, Glenoid
Scapula
-- Haemo / Pneumothorax
14. CT SCAN
• Medial 1/3 clavicle # cannot be visualised
properly in Plain radiographs
• Fractures of Glenoid in “Floating Shoulder”
• Midshaft #s – rarely required – can demonstrate
complex three dimensional deformity
• Lat 1/3 #s with intra articular extension
19. • Although displaced #s can’t be reduced &
maintained in good reduction by cons.Rx
*Cosmesis is acceptable
*Functional results are excellent
• Bony prominence resorbed with time
• Throwing athlets – malunion did not
significantly alter their throwing ability
20. • Traditionally clavicle #s have been managed
non operatively, but recent studies have shown
that union rate for displaced midshaft #s may
not be as favourable as described
• No obvious dif. in the outcome bet. Rx by a sling
or figure of 8 bandage
21. IS THERE A NEED TO
OPERATE A CLAVICLE
FRACTURE ?
25. PATIENT FACTORS
1. Polytrauma with requirement for early upper
limb weight bearing / arm usage
3. Patient motivation for rapid return of function
- elite sports
- self employed professionals
27. Anterosuperior approach
Advantages: 1. familiar to many
2. extendibility
3. clear fracture view – postop.xray
Disadva: 1. trajectory of screw placement difficult
2. inadvertent plunging of drill may
injure lung & neurovasc. Structures
3. clavicle is narrow in superoinf. direct.
4. hardware prominence - requires removal
28. Anteroinferior approach
Advantages: 1. easier screw trajectory
2. less likely iatrogenic injury
3. wider AP dimension – longer screws
4. less hardware prominence
5. easier to contour a plate along ant.bord
Disadvantages: 1. lack of general familiarity
2. plate obscures # site on x ray
29. Methods of fixation
1. Plate & Screw fixation
anatomic reduction, stable fixation
sugical morbidity is more
4. Intramedullary Pinning
smaller cosmetic skin incision, minimal soft
tissue stripping, decreased hardware
prominence
6. External Fixation
intrinsic healing, no scar, no morbidity,
no retained hardware
54. POSTOPERATIVE PROBLEMS
1. Scar
2. Sensitive or Painful # site
3. Hardware irritation / prominence
4. Incisional numbness
55. conclusions
• Majority of fractures heal with non operative Rx with
prompt return of near normal funct.
• Poor prognostic signs – increasing displ.of frag
- increasing commi.with
number of fragments
• Young active pts. – completely displaced midshaft #s
– superior results-primary fixation
• Operative plate fixation - more rapid return to a
superior level of function - low compli.rate
56. conclusions
• Antero inferior plating better than superior plating in
terms of soft tissue irritation
• Intramedullary fixation has many theoritical adv. and
high rate of success in skilled hands
• Scapular winging – conservative Rx - symptomatic
• Malunion is a definite clinical entity – benefits from
corrective osteotomy