The document summarizes Brian Lloyd's presentation at the Texas Water Conservation Association's 70th Annual Convention on the Public Utility Commission of Texas' activities related to water utility regulation. The PUC regulates electric, telephone, and water utilities in Texas. It will begin regulating water utilities directly in September 2014 and plans to implement ratemaking reforms over the next year to better account for differences in utility size. The PUC will also consider issues like meeting peak demand, rate design, conservation impacts, and rural infrastructure challenges.
1. Texas Water Conservation Association
70th Annual Convention
The Woodlands, Texas
Update on PUC Activities
Brian Lloyd
Executive Director
Public Utility Commission of Texas
March 6, 2014
2. About the PUC
• Created in 1975 by Texas
Legislature to provide statewide
regulation of electric, telephone
and water utilities.
• Since 1985, have primarily
regulated electric and telephone
• Beginning in mid-1990s, began
the transition of those industries
to competitive markets.
3. Mission Statement: We protect customers, foster
competition, and promote high quality infrastructure.
4.
5. Enforcement
• Responsibility to enforce the Public Utility Regulatory Act, PUC
rules, and other state laws.
• Start with informal investigations and data collection
• Majority of cases settled and presented to the Commission for approval
• Occasional cases are contested and go to the State Office of Administrative
Hearings (SOAH) for hearing.
• In FY 2013, 39 cases with a total of $3.01 million in penalties. All but
2 were settled or consisted of a default order for a license revocation.
6. Rates and Infrastructure
• Rate Regulation Division
• Analyzes rate
applications, earnings monitoring
reports, tariff changes, etc.
• Rate of return analysis
• Capital structure
• Cost allocation and rate design
• Infrastructure and Reliability
• Participates in infrastructure
(primarily electric transmission)
planning
• Analyzes utility plant investment
and depreciation in rate
proceedings
• Also operates PUC’s Emergency
Management Response Team
7. Water Utility Regulation Transfer
• PUC was under Sunset Commission Review in 2011 and 2013.
• Sunset Recommendation in 2011 was to transfer water utility regulation to
PUC.
• Bill did not pass for procedural reasons
• Transfer provisions were then amended onto another bill, but that one failed
to pass as well.
• Transfer provisions were a straight transfer with no changes to program,
• Interim committees continued discussion on water utility regulation
more generally
• PUC Sunset Bill in 2013 included transfer with significant changes to
the regulatory process
8. Water Utility Transfer
• Phase 1:
• Current rulemakings to apply PUC procedural rules (generally); develop
procedures relating to processing of pending cases, adoption of TCEQ’s
substantive rules as PUC rules (minimal substantive changes), adoption of
TCEQ forms as PUC forms (minimal substantive changes)
• September 1, 2014 transfer for rate regulation matters and CCN issues
• Existing regulatory requirements for rate applications continue to apply
• Transfer of 20 Full-Time Equivalent Employees from TCEQ to PUC
9. Water Utility Transfer
• Phase 2:
• From September 2014-September 2015 – rulemaking proceedings to
implement ratemaking reform
• Creation of three classes based on utility size
• A : similar to PUC regulation of electric utilities: high bar for interim rates, 185 day
deadline on processing cases, earnings monitoring process, comprehensive rate filing
package
• B : few changes compared to today’s streamlined process ; review of rate-filiing
packages, etc.
• C: addition of a new streamlined “cost-of-living” rate adjustment process
• Expectation of requesting 12-20 additional FTEs from next legislature
• Discussions on funding of program
10. Parallel Issues
• Meeting peak demand
• Summer peak electricity vs. water needs at time of drought
• Rate design/pricing signals
• High prices at time of peak demand can send powerful signals
• Impacts of conservation
• Volumetric charges and fixed cost recovery
• Addressing rural needs
• Flat/declining population and infrastructure maintenance
• Water/Energy nexus issues
• Environmental regulations
Editor's Notes
Thanks for inviteVery pleased to have the opportunity to come in what I hope is a repeat appearance for our agency. Certainly, we’ve been involved in many of the issues of the day in the water world from our own perspectivedrought – 2011 and impacts on power generationenvironmental regulation – EPArate making iimpacts of conservation and efficiencyadequacy to meet peak demand – elect vs. waterSpare you the song although it’d be a helluva rendition
Our mission can see organizationally how we are set up to accomplish these goalstouch very briefly on each of these sections because I think you’ll see how there really is overlap on what our folks do everyday and what you do. We’ll be making some changes to incorporate the water folks transferring over from TCEQ
In FY 2013 – abut 6700 electric complaints2000 telephone complaintsabout 5000 no-call list complaintsUnderstand that that is a big difference compared to water – lots of inquiries when there is a rate case, but less on the bill/switching/slamming issues that are more inherent in competitive markets