2. Crime Patterns and Trends
Want to know
How much crime is there?
Is it increasing or decreasing?
Who commits crime?
Answers are used to formulate theories
and develop policies to control crime
4. Uniform Crime Reports
Best known source of aggregate
criminal statistics
98% of the police departments in the
US voluntarily participate in UCR
Yearly FBI publication
Started 1930
5. Uniform Crime Reports
2 types of data collected:
1) Offenses reported to the police
Collect information on index crimes
reported to the police
Known as Index or Part I crimes
7. Uniform Crime Reports
2) Number and characteristics (age,
gender, and race/ethnicity) of those
arrested for all other crimes
Known as non-index or Part II crimes
On average, 20% of all reported index
crimes are cleared by arrest, lower for
many non-index crimes.
10. Uniform Crime Reports
Problems with the UCR
1) On average approximately 50% of all
index crimes are reported to the police
26% of thefts
50% of burglaries
45% of rapes
57% of robberies
11. Uniform Crime Reports
2) On average, 20% of all reported
index crimes are cleared by arrest
3) State law definitions may be different
than UCR definitions
4) Systematic errors in reporting
5) Deliberate alteration
12. Uniform Crime Reports
• 6) Only the most serious crime is an
“episode”
• 7) Weak on “white collar” crime
13. The Future of the Uniform Crime
Reports
National Incident-Based Reporting
System (NIBRS)
Maintained by the F.B.I.
Twenty-two crime categories
More information on each crime in each
category
Data compiled based on incidents, not
arrests.
14. Victimization surveys
National Crime Victimization Survey-NCVS
US Census
Started in 1972
60,000 households
120,000 people over 12 years old
Interviewed 2 times a year for 3 years
15. NCVS
Ask about theft, burglary, robbery,
assault, rape, and auto theft
Used to estimate the national frequency
of index crimes
16. Data provided by NCVS
Victimizations
Victims, offenders, crime event
Reported loss & injury
Whether crimes were reported
17. NCVS
Source: National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminal Victimization, 1997. Adapted from U.S.
Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office, December 1998), p. 3.
*Includes 357,000 “personal crimes” of purse snatching & pocket
picking.
Number of Offenses
20,106,000
7,359,000
4,635,000
1,433,000 944,000
311,000
Theft* Assault Burglary Motor vehicle
theft
Robbery Rape/ Sexual
assault
Total = 35,145,000
18. Advantages & Limitations of NCVS
ADVANTAGES
1) Best victimization data
2) “larger picture of crime”
DISADVANTAGES
1) Victim
misinterpretation
2) Memories fade
3) Lying to interviewer
4) Telescoping – problems
with recall
5) Expensive
19. Self-Report Surveys
Participants reveal information about their
violations of the law
Helps to get at “Dark Figure of Crime”
Supplement and expand official data
Can find out about the personality, attitudes,
and behavior of criminals
Accuracy for chronic offenders and drug
abusers may be limited
20. Self Report Studies
Interviews mainly with juveniles
Most youth engaged in delinquency (crime
is universal
Higher crime patterns than UCR and NCVS
21. Self-Report Surveys
Strength of self-reports surveys is get
more detailed information
Weaknesses include
Inaccuracy – are they telling the truth?
Focus on trivial acts frequently
22. Current Crime Trends
Current data from the Uniform
Crime Reports and the National
Crime Victim Surveys reveal a
steady decrease in crime. Self-
reported data reveals no
discernable change in the rate.
23. Current Crime Trends
Caution in interpreting UCR and other
data
Time frame is important
Overall rate hides increases and
decreases within crime categories
Want disaggregated data
By offense, state/region, etc.
24. Explaining Crime Trends
Age
The economy
Guns
Gangs
Drugs
Justice Policy
Some of the important
critical factors that have
been used to explain the
puzzle of crime rate trends.
26. Correlates of Crime –
Social Class
Higher crime rates in lower class areas
Rely on official statistics
Concern over whether function of police
practices or actual behavior patterns
Crime is not just street crime
Self-report studies indicate class-crime
relationship doesn’t exist
Focus on trivial offenses
27. Correlates of Crime –
Social Class
Why important?
1) If class-crime relationship then
poverty and neighborhood deterioration
related to crime
2) If not then factors experienced by all
classes (poor family environment, peer
pressure, school failure, free will)
related to crime
28. Correlates of Crime –
Age
Some argue that age structure of
society is the single most powerful
influence on the crime rate
13-17 year olds make up 6% of the
population but 30% of index crime
arrests
29. Correlates of Crime –
Age
Property crime arrests peak at age 16
Violent crime arrests peak at age 18
30. Correlates of Crime –
Age
Why does aging out occur?
Cognitive changes in late teens
No longer need for immediate gratification
Fear of punishment
Adulthood brings powerful ties to
conventional society
31. Correlates of Crime –
Gender
Male crime rate higher than female
Males commit more serious crimes
Recent view of female criminality
Socialization of females (supervised
closely)
Changing social and economic role of
women
32. Correlates of Crime –
Gender
Crime more a function of economic
inequality instead of female rights
End of “chivalry hypothesis”
33. Correlates of Crime –
Race/Ethnicity
Minorities involved in disproportionate
% of crimes
Blacks 12% of population, 44% of index
violent crime arrests
Reflection of police practices or true
criminal participation?
34. Correlates of Crime –
Race/Ethnicity
Causes of racial disparity in crime
Differential treatment by police
Subculture of violence
Racism and discrimination affect
personality and behavior
Poverty/Urban problems
Etc.
35. Knowledge drawn from UCR,
NCVS, and Self Report Studies
Crime Trends
Characteristics of Crimes
Characteristics of offenders & victims
Correlates of Crime
36. After following a birth cohort of 9,945 boys
born in Philadelphia in 1945, Wolfgang and
his associates found that 6% of the total sample
were responsible for 51.9% of all offenses.
The “Chronic 6%”
37. The “Chronic 6%”
Wolfgang findings
1) Small number of offenders commit a
disproportionate amount of crime
2) Chronic offenders continue into
adulthood
3) More violent as generations progress