Team Lead Succeed – Helping you and your team achieve high-performance teamwo...
Transitions from school to higher education: understanding the needs of undergraduates at LSE
1. Transitions from School to
Higher Education:
understanding the needs of
undergraduates at LSE
Jane Secker and Maria Bell
London School of Economics and Political Science
European Conference of Information Literacy 2014: Dubrovnik, Croatia, October 2014
2. Overview
Background
Undergraduate student support and
transition issues
The Student Ambassadors for Digital
Literacy (SADL) project
Working with local schools
Findings & observations
Lessons learnt
3. Background and context
LSE: specialist social science research
led university
World class library
Cosmopolitan students - relatively
small undergraduate population
(c.4500)
Traditional teaching and assessment
Blended learning support using
Moodle
Core course for LSE undergraduates
(LSE100)
4. Information literacy at LSE
2012 Audit of undergraduate support at LSE
Used ANCIL as audit tool
Report: Bell et al
2013 Teaching, Learning & Assessment Committee
report and recommendations
2013 Literature review: Embedding digital and
information literacy into undergraduate teaching
2013 LSE Digital and information Literacy
Framework
2013 HEA Changing Learning Landscape workshop
on digital literacy strategies and funding for SADL
5. The SADL Project
Collaborative Project:
Library
Centre for Learning
Technology(CLT)
Teaching and Learning Centre
Student Union
IT Training
Engagement with 2
academic departments –
20 undergraduates
Social Policy
Statistics
6. SADL: project aims
To explore how aspects of digital and information
literacy can be embedded into the curriculum
To better understand the existing digital and
information literacies of students
To develop and deliver interactive workshops on
finding, managing and evaluating information and
managing your digital footprint
To explore the role of Student Ambassadors as peer
support for others on their course
To share good practice at LSE on embedding digital,
academic and information literacies into the
curriculum
8. Research practices questionnaire
Research: where do you start?
How did you learn to use your
favourite research tool?
What do you think of the Library
search tools?
Assessing quality: library resources
and internet resources?
Identify strengths and weaknesses
of your research practices
Purdy, J. P. (2013) “Scholarliness as Other: How Students Explain Their Research-Writing Behaviors”. In McClure, R. &
Purdy, J. P. The New Digital Scholar - Exploring and Enriching the Research and Writing Practices of NextGen
Students. Information Today, New Jersey
9. Research practices questionnaire
“I go on to Moodle to find if there
are any relevant links that
Professors have posted online. If
there are recommended articles
that are in the library, I will search
for it. Otherwise, I will google
scholarly articles to see if anything
has been written about it.”
“Researching my first essays, I used
google scholar - it doesn't involve
much learning, the simplicity is what
makes it a useful first step.”
“I think it's comprehensive, but
sometimes it's hard to find to
narrow it down and to find the
most relevant information.”
“I scan the title and abstract to assess
which are the most relevant.”
“I think I am good at research to the extent that I can
find lots of resources and get the relevant articles
instead of going aimless and overwhelmed by the
information. My weakness is that I am still lack of all
kinds of tools and knowledge of websites to do a
good job on very scholarly research.”
“Mostly use one from
amongst the top 5 of the
Google hits. But mostly
on the relevance of the
url and the first few lines
that can be read on
google hits page.”
10. Workshop overview
Workshop 1: Introduction to the SADL project:
finding and evaluating information
Workshop 2: Reading and writing in your
discipline
Workshop 3: Managing and sharing information
Workshop 4: Managing your digital footprint
All resources on project website:
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsesadl/resources/
11. How do you
approach an
assignment?
Workshop 2:
reading and
writing in your
discipline?
12. Workshop 3:
Managing and
sharing information
How do you keep up
to date, manage,
store and cite your
information?
13. Workshop 4:
Managing your
digital identity
Digital Footprint:
why does it
matter?
14. The Student Voice
Student made videos: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsesadl/resources/
15. Working with schools
• Local further education college close to LSE
• Collaboration initiated by careers service and
teacher in October 2013
• Opportunity for 30 high achieving Year 12
politics and philosophy students
• A chance for us to understand students pre-university
and consider transition issues
• Many overlaps with the SADL project
16. The IL Programme
• Developed 3 workshops:
finding, evaluating,
managing, plagiarism
• Re-used and adapted
resources from SADL and
other OERs
• Student ambassadors talked
to the group in final session
• Students given access to LSE
Library for 6 months during
the programme
17. SADL: Findings and evaluation
Project collected rich data about their practices
Challenged assumptions and generalisations
Low awareness of existing resources and support
Contrasts between disciplines
- Statistics students don’t tend to use Library resources
- Social Policy students read extensively
Sharing – valued being part of the network but unsure
about where and how to share information
Student ambassador role needed more structure
But students were enthusiastic, willing to support others
and wanted to improve their digital literacies
18. Year 12 student feedback
• Students valued aspects of the workshops but
some claimed they were too basic
• Feedback from teacher highly positive
• Students highly valued access to LSE Library
and a chance to meet SADL students
• Interactive nature of workshops worked less
well and some students reluctant to
participate
• Poor attendance by some in group
19. Lessons learnt
Developing relationships with students takes
time and different age groups need
different approaches
Workshops require:
Defined aims and objectives
A lot of preparation time
A suitable learning space
Valuable staff development – new techniques, activities
Ambassador role is useful but requires clear expectations and
ways to facilitate peer support and mentoring
Facebook Group, Moodle forum?
Student led workshops for their peers and Year 12 students?
We need greater publicity in LSE for academic departments
and other students to highlight the importance of IL
20. IL initiatives 2014-15
Funding for SADL provided by Library / LTI
Greater clarification of Student Ambassador role
being provided – working with some existing
ambassadors who stayed on board
Exploring the best platform for students to share
with their peers
Recruited 2 further departments (40 students)
Reviewing IL programme for Year 12 students as
their needs are clearly different to existing
undergraduates
Staff development workshop planned for Feb
2015
21. Further reading and
resources
Bell, Maria and Moon, Darren and Secker, Jane (2012) Undergraduate support at LSE: the ANCIL report.
The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Available at:
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48058/
Karnad, Arun (2013) Embedding digital and information literacy into undergraduate teaching. Centre for
Learning Technology (CLT), London, UK. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/51221/
LSE Digital and Information Literacy Framework (2013) Available at:http://bit.ly/1gq63IO
LSE SADL Project website and resources (2014) Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsesadl/resources
Secker, Jane, Karnad, Arun , Bell, Maria, Wilkinson, Ellen and Provencher, Claudine (2014) Student
ambassadors for digital literacy (SADL): project final report. Learning Technology and Innovation ,
London, UK. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59479/
Secker, Jane and Karnad, Arun (2014) SADL project evaluation report. Learning Technology and
Innovation , London, UK. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59478/
22. Thank you
Find out more at http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsesadl/
SADL Resources http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsesadl/resources/
@LSESADL
Jane Secker j.secker@lse.ac.uk@jsecker
Maria Bell m.bell@lse.ac.uk@bellmari
23. Digital Literacy
JISC definition:
“By digital literacy we mean those capabilities
which fit an individual for living, learning and
working in a digital society: for example, the
skills to use digital tools to undertake academic
research, writing and critical thinking; as part of
personal development planning; and as a way of
showcasing achievements.”
Hinweis der Redaktion
Maria to introduce talk 2 mins
Introduce each other and where we are coming from
Maria
Launch of the SADL project
Working with LSE undergraduates
Partnership with local school
Year 12 (16-17 year olds)
Maria
Maria – be brief as discussed last year!
This is the history and how we got to SADL
ANCIL and audit results:
Not embedded
Belief that IL is important: find, evaluate and manage
Some good practice but inconsistent
Time main barrier
Students ‘should’ have IL skills
Information use largely driven by reading lists and resources in Moodle
Maria
Project collaboration – why all of these? Led by Library and CLT – be clear this is focusing on last year
Why 2 academic depts chosen? Qualitative & quantitative
Good working relationship - helped engagement
Is there a value in establishing a Student Ambassadors Network for digital literacies and is there a role for students to act as peer mentors on their courses?
What digital literacies students already have and what do they need?
What are the best strategies to support students in developing digital and information literacies and how and when should support be delivered?
Engaging students – how did we go about this?
Student recruitment – looking for 10 students from each department
What we did?
Created a person spec and students had to apply
Student Union support
‘Shout outs’ in class
Email / Moodle
Twitter
Effective?
Got 20 students. Range of years
Incentives
Statement on Higher Edcuation Achievement Report (HEAR) record
Amazon vouchers – attendance at workshop and participation in additional activities e.g. Candi, HEA events
Badges – online badges (Mozilla open badges)
Wanted to give them real badges but apparently they’re not cool (Maria?)
What? Purdy Questions used
Why did we do this?
To explore scholarly practices or understanding of scholarly practices of our ambassadors before the project started.
Asked them to identify strengths and weaknesses as a researcher
Purdy, James P. (2013) “Scholarliness as Other: How Students Explain Their Research-Writing Behaviors”. In McClure, Randall and Purdy, James P. The New Digital Scholar - Exploring and Enriching the Research and Writing Practices of NextGen Students. Information Today, New Jersey
Maria
Examples of responses
Show evidence of good practice
Common issues:
distraction;
being unfocussed;
too much;
unsure about assessing quality of sources but know they should be.
What will do later? Post project questionnaire will re-examine and assess impact of project
Jane
Format of the workshops
Interactive – we learnt from them as much as they learnt from us
Activity based
Quick wins where they learnt a digital skill
Meetings with students initially envisaged as focus groups
Then thought that rather than just seek information from students, should also provide development for students – 2 way
Interactive activities
Provide input
Quick win – skill they leave with
Jane
Show some of the work done
How students approach and assignment
One is stats and one is social Policy
Shows tools used and the approach
Also shows how students interweave academic work with their lives – cook and eat, facebook chat, social media
Jane
Range of different software used – other posters with further tools
Students shared with us and each other – asked about tolls they didn’t know about and were interested in trying these out.
Jane
Range of different software used – other posters with further tools
Students shared with us and each other – asked about tolls they didn’t know about and were interested in trying these out.
Jane
In out final video we made three videos which we would urge you to look at. We asked student
What the most important things they learnt in the project were
about why the ambassador role was important
And what they had learnt about their digital footprint
Jane
Jane
Introduction to an academic library, key resource types and finding information
Evaluating online information, using Google Scholar
Academic writing, citing and referencing and plagiarism
Our resources are now in Jorum – mention this
Jane
Challenge any assumptions and generalisations about students as they are all different and have developed different strategies for study
Challenged assumptions and generalisations about students approaches to study and technology
Students from different disciplines have different academic practices but there is merit in bringing them together
Statistics students don’t tend to use library resources, but this was a great way of learning about what their needs are around data, stats help etc.
Hard for students to share things. Hard to bring up – not going to bring up Mendeley in the pub on a Friday night
Librarians find digital tools much more interesting and are likely to share with each other than students do!
We are more likely to talk about Mendeley in the pub on a Friday night – Maria
Students very enthusiastic – want to share and even lead sessions for fellow students – need help facilitating this. The engagement in the workshops has been very high – the students are motivated and want to particpate. There’s been no drop off in attendance and some students have been involved in other activities – Candi (parternship with 6th form college to give a level students flavour of uni and develop research skillls) – and speaking at and HEA event held at LSE in May.
SADL students valued learning to find, evaluate and manage information but digital footprint workshop most popular
Students found out about resources and support at LSE
Students valued being part of a network to meet other students
Peer support role valued - sharing tools / apps
More details in Project Evaluation Report
Maria
Same sessions run for SADL - Year 12 said too basic ! But is this typical of students of this age who won’t admit what they don’t know. Discussions with WP team said this was very common.
They haven’t made the transition, so less aware of what they need to know?
Teacher said that students didn’t know everything we told them
Students less used to seminar style / interactive teaching – expect teacher to tell them answer! Dependent mode of learning
Maria
Set clear expectations about the role of digital literacy ambassadors
Are the students an ambassador, a champion, a mentor for others?
Be prepared for trust to take time to develop – students will open up as they get to know you
Workshops need a lot of planning and resources to ensure they are engaging and interactive – plan for plenty of activities and opportunities for you to learn from the students!
Early workshops need to be structured – makes students more comfortable. Can get more flexible as project goes on once they gain confidence and get to know us and each other
Learned how to teach Ugs, activities – adapted resources made available as OERs from Adam Edwards, Middlesex and Matt Borg, Sheffield Hallam
- Workshop 2 – fuzzy on our aim meant less satisfactory but good input from students still. Made us think and reflect better for 3 and for rest of project objective.
and space has an impact on the atmosphere you are creating – if you want informal, then don’t use a board room!
Staff development issues – time consuming and need others able to teach this style of workshops
Maria and Jane together
Just show the slide (no time to talk to it)
Just show slide
Ellen
In the first workshop we gave the students 3 definitions for Digital Literacy and asked them to choose one.
“the ‘savvyness’ that allows young people to participate meaningfully and safely as digital technology becomes ever more pervasive in society.” (Future lab)
“By digital literacy we mean those capabilities which fit an individual for living, learning and working in a digital society; for example, the skills to use digital tools to undertake academic research, writing and critical thinking: as per personal development planning: and as a way of showcasing achievements.” (JISC)
“Digital and information literacies are the skills, knowledge and understanding that underpin our ability to learn, undertake research and to teach in a digital age. It is vital that LSE students and staff develop critical, creative, discerning and safe practises when engaging with information in the academic environment.” (LSE definition)
They chose the JISC one overwhelmingly