SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 29
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
The Future of Social Media

.




We all use social media, some of us work with brands who
use social media to greater or lesser effect.
And we’ve all seen case studies, from media owners,
distribution companies, colleagues and bloggers. So I’m
not going to cover the same ground. I’ve been to a couple
of conferences recently which were mainly meant for
marketing folk, and the speakers were some of the top
strategists working in social media, some techie, some
agency and some brand marketers. And they were trying
to explain a little bit further ahead than the case studies
do, to really go into why stuff works on the internet. So I’ve
tried to pull some of the strands together.….




What’s going on,
What we can do to help our clients.
And what we can do ourselves




I’m going to talk a bit about how changing technology
affects brands, so it is worth having a look at what a brand
was. If you go back to when products like Coca Cola were
launched, the brand was a symbol that you could trust and
rely on to deliver quality and value for money. This worked
because in the days before fast communications, the only
people you could rely on for information were family and
friends, and probably only those in your immediate vicinity.
The brand became a mark of reputation – almost like a
substitute for someone you know having told you that
coke tasted good.
We haven’t changed – our species has grown up around
narrative. Linguistic development gave us the competitive
advantage to out-evolve our closest competitors.
Companionship and a sense of belonging are basic
human requirements. We need to belong to tribes,
whether through shared interests, family bonds, religious
beliefs, or supporting the same team, as this feeds our
sense of who we are – it makes us human. Technology
just opens up wider groups of people who share our
interests – the tribes become bigger, and better informed




The idea of brands as a substitute for information grew up
in the industrial age. The broadcast transmission of
information belongs to this era too: it is a linear process
where raw materials, labour and distribution are
expensive, so needs to work on a huge scale in order to
be effective. Linear production meant standards of living
soared during the 20th century




And this production line model was used as the basis for
marketing products too. Like the in factories, raw materials
(ad agencies) were expensive, so huge scale was needed
at the start of the process. Remember, brands are
substitutes for information and recommendation.

And how did that work?
Well how did that work? W.H. Lever was a soap
manufacturer in the early 20th century. He made the very
famous, and extremely over-used quote half his
advertising budget was wasted, but he didn’t know which
half. (the effective half was very effective though, and his
company has since changed its name from Lever Brothers
to Unilever).
That has become a truism in our industry that we have
spent vast sums of our clients’ research budgets trying to
correct.
And this is a picture of what we’ve come up with. If anyone
has ever tried feeding an 8 month old baby then they will
know that it is messy, there’s a lot of wastage, and it
quickly becomes very frustrating that any sort of dialogue
or reasoning won’t happen until some unspecified point in
the future. But after a lot of work, the baby gets enough to
keep going. And I’m sure you can guess the point that I’m
labouring… this is pretty much the same as mass media
advertising
(thanks to Rohit Bhargava at Ogilvy for the analogy)




We know it would be better if communication was a two-
way idea, but for now we keep shovelling in the food. All
that research to find out which 50% was wasted has
confirmed that recommendation is the best way to
convince people of something. And going back to our coca
cola example, a brand is still a substitute for actual
recommendation.




But marketing is still means to create economic
advantage. So has economics changed? (ignoring the last
couple of months’ worth of banking disasters). Well here is
a definition of ‘economics’, and this starts to explain where
the change comes in. The key word is ‘scarce’. Because
networked distribution changes everything




This is Gordon Moore, who set up Intel. In 1965 he
observed that although the number of transistors that
could be placed on a circuit board had doubled every two
years since the invention of the integrated circuits in 1958,
and predicted that this exponential growth would continue
unchecked. So far he has been proved right, and this law
of exponential increase in computing speed and memory
capacity is what has fundamentally changed our methods
of communication.




In the industrial age, media were expensive. Movies
needed people and technology to create, and time, space
and money to distribute and store. Newspapers were
hugely labour intensive to write, expensive to physically
print, and had to be distributed quickly to maintain
demand. Increases in processing power and storage
mean that production and storage is now virtually free.
The internet means that distribution is virtually free. So
information and entertainment is now free, while
Economics relies on scarcity to define value. And a
virtually infinite amount of information and entertainment is
a drain on the finite amount of attention available to
consume it. What is scarce, and therefore valuable, is
attention. As people form networks, their attention
becomes focused more on conversation – on non-
commercial media. Familiarity breeds trust, as it did for the
industrial era brands. So now we trust people we don’t
know just as much as we those we do.
In this environment where immediate open global
communication with people that we don’t know but that we
trust is the norm, there is no need for a substitute for
recommendation. A brand is whatever people say it is.
This is important, as it isn’t what brand marketers or the
media say it is. Rather than being a one-way substitute for
recommendation, as it has been all the way through the
era of industrial marketing, a brand is now the sum total of
all the recommendations that already exist for it. And this
is a dialogue. As long as the positives outweigh the
negatives, then the main thing a brand has to do is be
talked about. And if the conversation is negative, then it is
easy to find out using a whole range of free tools like
Brand Tags, and to address the negatives. In an open
conversational way.
So individually we have more conversations in real life
than online. It‘s just that online conversation is stored and
indexed forever, and it happens globally and immediately.
And recommendation online also helps your product’s
sales directly. ‘Recommendation’ online is hyperlinked.
When Google launched, the huge advantage it had over
all the other search engines that were around at the time
was that rather than just counting the number of time a
word appeared on a page to give a relevancy score, it also
included the number of links to that page – ie it counted
how many times the page had been recommended. The
total number of recommendations made up the page’s
Reputation, or quality score. So it follows that to grow your
market, a brand must be part of the conversation




In fact, markets are conversations. I like the first quote, not
just because it is true, but because it sort of proves the
second. We forget how revolutionary the Cluetrain
Manifesto was in 1999, and sure enough it took longer
than two years for technology to change the world. But it is
worth remembering when listening to geeks like me get
overexcited about the future that this I’m probably
underestimating the change in the next ten years
Why? Well since the internet was invented, it has slowly
grown to a point where it has roughly the same number of
computers connected as there are cells in the human
brain, and about the same number of links as there are
connections. The number of synapses, or connections, in
our brains is taken as a proxy for intelligence – it is
basically processing power. So in 16 years between 1990,
when Sir Tim Berners-Lee wrote the worldwide web, and
2007 when Kevin Kelly wrote this theory, the internet has
developed the intelligence of one person.
      And as we’ve seen, Moore’s Law means that all the
processors, and all the storage, and all the other capacity
will each be doubling in capacity every two years. By
2040, the internet will have the brainpower of 4 billion
people.
      The next big development will be the move from the
Internet of data to the internet of things – everything can
communicate with everything else.
      We are going to move over the next few years from
millions of computers CONNECTED by the internet, to
one huge computer that IS the internet. Every device will
be a window into it. Your phone will be able to socially
network with other people in the surrounding area, and
only alert you if you need to know about them. This will
obviously mean that a huge amount of data is flying
around, and that where there is more information, there is
less attention. So brands will have to work even harder to
earn that attention. Most of the time they will not be able to
communicate with us unless they are invited into our
digital life by our devices. As an example, if you switch on
your phone, only ads that are better than the programmes
you want to see will have been showing up as
recommended for you. You will not need to look any
further than your phone’s recommendations, as it knows
far more than you could ever have time to about what you
want to watch. Gaining attention by interrupting people
starts to look a bit outdated.
So the result in a completely connected, always on world,
is that the internet is like air – always there, but in the
background. People are starting to worry about Googlism,
where they are no longer able to remember things
because they have come to rely so much on just being
able to search. I get withdrawal symptoms if I am away
from a Wifi connection for very long. But is this reliance on
an information system really such a bad thing?
Remember, the internet is not a medium, it is a way of
organising and structuring information. To have more
chance of unlocking its potential, we need to think of it in
terms of other systems for structuring information. For
example, the alphabet. We haven’t worried about relying
on the alphabet to store our information for the last 1500
years. And we don’t use the alphabet as an advertising
medium. Well, we do, obviously – copy is written in words,
ideas are created and sold in words. But it is something so
fundamental that it goes on in the background. If we think
of technology in terms of media channels like TV and
radio, our frame of reference is too narrow
Now I don’t think that very much of that is futuristic…
As sci-fi author William Gibson said, and every advertising
blogger has repeated, the future is already here, it just
isn’t evenly distributed yet. I can already screen out all TV
advertising, and all online advertising, search and display.
But I don’t, cos I work in advertising. Most people don’t
know how. Yet. Historically there was an understanding
that advertising was a necessary evil, because it paid for
content, and content was expensive. Now content is free
and on YouTube (this is why YouTube are struggling to
make money out of the old media economic model).
Google’s mission is to organise the world’s information….
And content is just information.
Change has never happened faster than it is doing, and
change will also never happen this slowly again. So it is
important to understand what has changed and what
hasn’t
Are the ones on the right technology? Are the ones on the
left museum pieces? Technology is a relative concept -
just a word for anything that wasn’t invented when you
were born.




And what will media look like? Media is just the means for
distributing information, and this is one of Chris
Anderson’s examples of what has changed. Hollywood
was based on the fact that there were a limited number of
really successful movies, after which demand fell quickly
away to zero. Actually turns out it wasn’t that people only
liked a few movies, rather that the distribution system was
really inefficient at matching supply to demand. Although
over 10,000 movies were being professionally made each
year the capacity of US cinemas was only 120 movies –
so they created the concept of the Blockbuster – the
syndicated, extended, marketed extravaganza.. Now
technology is able to cater for demand, the Blockbuster
model starts to look very inefficient.
This is an image of the Blockbuster model from social
media consultant David Cushman. Messages are one-
way, and value is all about the number of eyeballs. This is
industrial information.




But what about when the audience BECOME the media
channel – when they can create and distribute through
networked conversation without relying on a broadcaster?
And it is harder to interrupt a conversation than it is to
interrupt content. Brands will have to become part of the
conversation.
What does this all mean?
The role of a brand in the age of industrial marketing no
longer exists
Attention is scarce and expensive. Media is not
We already have tools to avoid advertising. They will
increase exponentially
And what to do about it? Understand that all media is
social. The revolution will be hyperlinked. We are now the
producers and distributors of media. And there’s more of
people than there are media outlets. Change is only going
to get faster, so the main thing for a brand to do is jump
into it. I’m going to try and explain without referring to the
same old case studies again




Confucius wrote this 2,500 years ago and it is still just as
true today. What has changed is that the involving bit was
always difficult, so as advertisers had to show & tell.
Technology makes involving easier, and as we’ve seen,
also make it much easier to avoid the show and tell stuff. If
something is entertaining and involving, we will
understand it and talk about it. This is the first thing brands
can do to be part of the conversation
No, really. We are. When all media was mass,
demographics made sense. Now a lot of media is
becoming about one to one conversations, there’s no
need to deal in averages any more. Remember, the
average UK resident has one breast and one testicle. We
could of course track and monitor everything that people
do online, so that we can interrupt people in new and
more relevant ways. But that is still jumping straight into
the middle of the conversation. If a brand is a sum of all
the recommendations that exist for it, then all the brilliant
targeting in the world won’t make up for crap products or
poor customer service.
But won’t that all just be a bit half-arsed? A guy called Bill
Buxton, who wrote Sketching User Experience, talks
about an art college ceramics professor, who comes in on
the first day of class and divides the students into two
sections. He tells one half of the class that their final grade
will be based exclusively on the volume of their
production; the more they make, the better their grade.
The professor tells the other half of the class that they will
be graded more traditionally, based solely on the quality of
their best piece. At the end of the semester, the professor
discovered that the students who were focused on making
as many pots as possible also ended up creating the best
pots, much better than the pots made by the students who
spent all semester trying to create that one perfect pot. I
like this analogy as it is what the more forward thinking
brands have been doing. Testing everything. Orange’s
Internet Balloon Race might have been a huge success,
but equally, their island in Second Life looked great and
had no visitors. So they are investing more in ideas like
Internet Balloon races at the moment. Actually that’s an
interesting example for media agencies to take note of –
the balloon race is an example of advertising that media
owners want to carry for free – 3000 sites, including the
Sun and Vodafone, asked to be included. No media
budget changed hands.
Because we don’t ignore advertising…. we just ignore shit
advertising – it’s become really easy. Anyone know what
OTHER blender ads look like? Thought not.

Fail little and often

"..our company's success rate runs between 50 and
60 percent. About half of our new products succeed.
That's as high as we want the success rate to be. If we
try to make it any higher, we'll be tempted to err on
the side of caution”
      A.G. Latley – CEO, Procter & Gamble

So the real step change for clients is about not trying to
build that perfect pot – it’s about not worrying about the
bad ones. Charles Darwin said “It is not the strongest of
the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that
survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to
change.” We know that species of animal can remain
unchanged for millennia, and then suddenly evolve in a
few generations as their environment changes. As the
internet ushers out the era of industrial marketing, we
need to help our clients avoid erring on the side of caution.




The first seven are print, audio, cinema, radio, TV, internet
and mobile. As I paraphrased from Kevin Kelly, soon these
will all just be screens into the internet, and the mobile will
presumably be the most important screen because it is
always with us and always on.
WE are the distribution,
WE are the content,
WE are the 'user journey',
WE are how messages are transmitted.
WE are the medium and the media carried by it
(again, borrowing from David Cushman)




And where does that leave the things we have watched
and listened to? This is what TV was all about – the
watercooler moment. This is why music drives popular
culture. Now back in the early days of commercial TV,
when people were first working out what to put on it, how it
differed from press and radio, how you might use it to
advertise, FMCG brands realised that there wasn’t enough
of the right kind of shows to target their housewife target
audiences. So they got together with the broadcasters and
created regular chunks of real life drama that they could
advertise households around. Because of the way these
shows came into being, and the content of the ads around
them, they were dismissively referred to as ‘soap operas’.
Today NBC are setting up social viewing rooms to allow
people to connect with other fans of shows in real time,
and schedule their non-scheduled viewing around when
their friends are watching (whether or not they are friends
they have met). In the 50s, value was in content that
appealed to mass audience. Today it is in the network that
talks about that content.

Content isn't king... If I sent you to a desert island and
gave you the choice of taking your friends or your
movies, you'd choose your friends -- if you chose the
movies, we'd call you a sociopath. Conversation is
king. Content is just something to talk about
     Cory Doctorow, BoingBoing post 2006

Because today, we are not limited to 2 TV channels or the
radio as a choice of our evening’s entertainment. The
advertising industry grew up on the basis that if it
interrupted your viewing, there was very little that you
could do about it. When the internet came along, it
repackaged those expensive TV ads into small screen
formats, and created something called a microsite, an
online version of the millennium dome that cost lots but
contained nothing. Content may “just” be something to talk
about, but the value in a network economy is not in the
content, it is in the talk.




Using advertising to generate PR isn’t a new idea, it’s just
much easier now. Mainly because ‘PR’ didn’t used to be
true. It wasn’t Public relations, it was media relations. Now
the media and the public is becoming the same thing, PR
is becoming real and therefore has to be transparent and
true. Anyway…these are the ads that made the careers of
the Saatchi brothers and Trevor Beattie. None of them ran
for long, and not much was spent buying media, but they
were all about getting people talking. Back then, this
meant do something so different or risque that the national
news media talked about it, which meant everyone else
found out about it. Now, it means the same except there is
no longer a requirement for the national media. It isn’t a
top-down broadcast economy any more.




But being talked about is still about creating things that are
remarkable. As Seth Godin says: a brown cow isn’t
interesting. If you have a purple cow, people will talk about
it. Whether that is great advertising, exemplary customer
service, a perfect product, even brilliant packaging, if
people talk about it, then it will mutate and spread.
Mutating and spreading is what it is all about. The concept
of owning copyright on something that costs nothing to
produce or distribute is fairly odd one. In the networked
world, intellectual property is called reputation, and
reputation is a result of sharing. Most businesses that
relied on copyright during the industrial marketing era
have realised that the world has changed: the quote on
the slide is from the CEO of Disney. But it is more
important to realise how things will change from now. For
example, the Guardian became the first traditional
newspaper publisher to publish full RSS feeds last month.
This frees up all their content to be shared, embedded,
linked and remixed by anyone that wants to. The New
York Times has gone one step further, and released a
number of APIs – if you don’t know what one of those is,
think of Facebook apps or Google Maps. They allow any
developer to build their data into new applications. To
share and re-distribute is now the goal of business.
Brands need to open up and copy publishers, because the
user is the destination, not the website
And part of opening up is treating the brand less seriously.
It is difficult to work with people who are co-creating stuff
around your brand, if you have a restrictive set of brand
guidelines. Now if people are interested in your brand,
then they will create and share around it regardless of
what guidelines you have. The value in a networked
economy is in what is shared. So if you want to take full
advantage of this value as a brand, you need to lighten up
and accept it. In fact, you really need to help and
encourage it. People form networks for fun as much as for
support, and brands that want to join in have to be able to
do fun in a human voice.
And whatever voice you use, the most important thing for
brands to remember is that listening is more important.
Brands aren’t good at listening because they’ve never had
the opportunity to practice before. Industrial marketing is
too expensive to do as a dialogue, so brands had to rely
on focus groups as a proxy. This tended to be
conversation in a marketing voice, not in a human one. It
was also only a quick chat, not an ongoing conversation




Dialogue is an ongoing process – brands will be found out
if they screw up at any stage of their relationship with
people.
Comcast had a similar reputation in the US to NTL/Virgin
in the UK: the ISP equivalent of Ryanair. Or at least it was
until one bloke in their minimal customer service
department realised that he could cut through the
bureaucracy and speak to people directly and in a human
voice on Twitter. Google ‘comcast customer service’ and
this is in the first three results. Markets are conversations,
and marketing is customer service
So if brands are just the sum total of all the conversations
that they are involved with. and content is just information,
and all information is free to Google and to the Single Big
Computer that all our screens are going to peer into, and
media is no longer scarce and it is now attention that is
valuable.

This is why really nearly free is now a viable business
model. IBM for example used to be in the computer
business. As we’ve seen, there isn’t much value producing
hardware any more, so they moved to the consultancy
business. And a lot of what they do is given away by an
research organisation called the IBM Institute for
Business Value. This is all research from top level
academics, that would cost thousands of pounds a few
years ago. By giving this away, their content reaches the
attention of more potential customers than other
consultancies. They develop reputation and authority. In
the past, we were what we owned. Now we are what we
share.
Closer to home, anyone in a media agency who has tried
to present social media to a client soon realises the value
of sharing. The only robust global survey on social media
usage was conducted by Universal McCann. Rather than
locking this expensive research away for their own clients’
use, it has been widely shared to planning bloggers, and
distributed to agencies round the world. If I try and present
any facts about social media to a client, I will refer to our
competitor’s market leading research, and position
Universal McCann as the authority on social media.




So if image isn’t enough to create business advantage any
more, and both the production and distribution of media
are close enough to free to be done by anyone, how do
you stand out enough to build reputation? How about
looking at what isn’t abundant? Creating experiences.
Standing for something. Being generous. Orange
Rockcorps connects worthy causes with willing volunteers
(whether they are digging a hole or playing at the Royal
Albert Hall), it connects music fans with live music, it
CONNECTS. It puts the brand at the centre of a network –
enabling the network, creating experience and doing
good.
Listen to what people want. Enable it. Commit don’t
campaign, and remember communication is a two-way
process.




So what can we learn from the most expensive marketing
campaign in the history of the world? From the moment he
became the Republican nominee, McCain focused on one
thing – making sure he had people’s vote on 4th
November. Obama on the other hand had been asking for
people who supported him to give $10 since the start of
2007. The 4m people who did remained in contact through
email, through the campaign Ning network
mybarackobama, and via Twitter, Facebook, etc. When
the time came to ask people to come out and vote, there
were 4m people ready to make 5 phone calls each to
undecided voters when they were asked to. The campaign
didn’t need to rely on overworked campaigners, just
millions of volunteers doing a little bit each. And those
donations that started them off meant that the Democrat
campaign could outspend the Republicans by 3 to 1 in
battleground states. (and do something different for half an
hour of mainstream primetime television, as the future isn’t
evenly distributed yet)




There’s lots of people out there who know a lot more
about this than me – these are some of the ones whose
ideas I borrowed, mashed up, expanded upon and
generally stole. Conversations start with listening, so listen
to what these people are saying before conversing with
your clients!

http://graewood.blogspot.com/
The Future Of [Social] Media

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

The Handwriting on the Wall: The Pros and Cons of Social Media Use Among Teens
The Handwriting on the Wall: The Pros and Cons of Social Media Use Among TeensThe Handwriting on the Wall: The Pros and Cons of Social Media Use Among Teens
The Handwriting on the Wall: The Pros and Cons of Social Media Use Among TeensProphetik Soul Branding + Design
 
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital IdentityYouth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identityfrankman1701
 
Relações Públicas Online
Relações Públicas OnlineRelações Públicas Online
Relações Públicas OnlineBruno Amaral
 
The Economist ideas community june 2012 final
The Economist ideas community june 2012 finalThe Economist ideas community june 2012 final
The Economist ideas community june 2012 finalNick Blunden
 
EXT 503 - The New Decision Makers
EXT 503 - The New Decision MakersEXT 503 - The New Decision Makers
EXT 503 - The New Decision MakersJoanna Wiebe
 
Collective Intelligence, Participatory Culture, Remixable Media & IP
Collective Intelligence, Participatory Culture, Remixable Media & IPCollective Intelligence, Participatory Culture, Remixable Media & IP
Collective Intelligence, Participatory Culture, Remixable Media & IPClaudia Leigh
 
Social media what's going? v3 by Laurent François aka lilzeon
Social media what's going? v3 by Laurent François aka lilzeonSocial media what's going? v3 by Laurent François aka lilzeon
Social media what's going? v3 by Laurent François aka lilzeonLaurent François
 
Pondering Media, Literacy, & Learning in a Networked World
Pondering Media, Literacy, & Learning in a Networked WorldPondering Media, Literacy, & Learning in a Networked World
Pondering Media, Literacy, & Learning in a Networked WorldAlec Couros
 
Disrupting School: Learning in the 21st Century
Disrupting School: Learning in the 21st CenturyDisrupting School: Learning in the 21st Century
Disrupting School: Learning in the 21st CenturyAlec Couros
 
Marketing: How to craft a brand that people love and value?
Marketing: How to craft a brand that people love and value?Marketing: How to craft a brand that people love and value?
Marketing: How to craft a brand that people love and value?Anders Lindgren
 
#Etmooc connected learning
#Etmooc connected learning#Etmooc connected learning
#Etmooc connected learningAlec Couros
 
Identity in a Digital World
Identity in a Digital WorldIdentity in a Digital World
Identity in a Digital WorldAlec Couros
 
Beyond The Web 2.0 Hype
Beyond The Web 2.0 HypeBeyond The Web 2.0 Hype
Beyond The Web 2.0 HypeDavid Jakes
 
The Tedium is the Message: Communicating and Creating with the New Social Media
The Tedium is the Message: Communicating and Creating with the New Social MediaThe Tedium is the Message: Communicating and Creating with the New Social Media
The Tedium is the Message: Communicating and Creating with the New Social MediaFordham University
 
Online Learning in a Networked Age
Online Learning in a Networked AgeOnline Learning in a Networked Age
Online Learning in a Networked AgeAlec Couros
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

The Handwriting on the Wall: The Pros and Cons of Social Media Use Among Teens
The Handwriting on the Wall: The Pros and Cons of Social Media Use Among TeensThe Handwriting on the Wall: The Pros and Cons of Social Media Use Among Teens
The Handwriting on the Wall: The Pros and Cons of Social Media Use Among Teens
 
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital IdentityYouth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
Youth Culture, Self-Representation and Digital Identity
 
Relações Públicas Online
Relações Públicas OnlineRelações Públicas Online
Relações Públicas Online
 
Henry Jenkins
Henry JenkinsHenry Jenkins
Henry Jenkins
 
The Economist ideas community june 2012 final
The Economist ideas community june 2012 finalThe Economist ideas community june 2012 final
The Economist ideas community june 2012 final
 
EXT 503 - The New Decision Makers
EXT 503 - The New Decision MakersEXT 503 - The New Decision Makers
EXT 503 - The New Decision Makers
 
Clay shirky
Clay shirkyClay shirky
Clay shirky
 
Collective Intelligence, Participatory Culture, Remixable Media & IP
Collective Intelligence, Participatory Culture, Remixable Media & IPCollective Intelligence, Participatory Culture, Remixable Media & IP
Collective Intelligence, Participatory Culture, Remixable Media & IP
 
ChangeMedium
ChangeMediumChangeMedium
ChangeMedium
 
Social media what's going? v3 by Laurent François aka lilzeon
Social media what's going? v3 by Laurent François aka lilzeonSocial media what's going? v3 by Laurent François aka lilzeon
Social media what's going? v3 by Laurent François aka lilzeon
 
Pondering Media, Literacy, & Learning in a Networked World
Pondering Media, Literacy, & Learning in a Networked WorldPondering Media, Literacy, & Learning in a Networked World
Pondering Media, Literacy, & Learning in a Networked World
 
Speech mea-award
Speech mea-awardSpeech mea-award
Speech mea-award
 
Disrupting School: Learning in the 21st Century
Disrupting School: Learning in the 21st CenturyDisrupting School: Learning in the 21st Century
Disrupting School: Learning in the 21st Century
 
Marketing: How to craft a brand that people love and value?
Marketing: How to craft a brand that people love and value?Marketing: How to craft a brand that people love and value?
Marketing: How to craft a brand that people love and value?
 
#Etmooc connected learning
#Etmooc connected learning#Etmooc connected learning
#Etmooc connected learning
 
Identity in a Digital World
Identity in a Digital WorldIdentity in a Digital World
Identity in a Digital World
 
Beyond The Web 2.0 Hype
Beyond The Web 2.0 HypeBeyond The Web 2.0 Hype
Beyond The Web 2.0 Hype
 
The Tedium is the Message: Communicating and Creating with the New Social Media
The Tedium is the Message: Communicating and Creating with the New Social MediaThe Tedium is the Message: Communicating and Creating with the New Social Media
The Tedium is the Message: Communicating and Creating with the New Social Media
 
Digital trends and us
Digital trends and usDigital trends and us
Digital trends and us
 
Online Learning in a Networked Age
Online Learning in a Networked AgeOnline Learning in a Networked Age
Online Learning in a Networked Age
 

Ähnlich wie The Future Of [Social] Media

Marketing Trends To Watch
Marketing Trends To WatchMarketing Trends To Watch
Marketing Trends To WatchScott Brandon
 
Y&R: 10 Snapshots from SXSWi 2015
Y&R: 10 Snapshots from SXSWi 2015Y&R: 10 Snapshots from SXSWi 2015
Y&R: 10 Snapshots from SXSWi 2015Young & Rubicam
 
Web summit summary
Web summit summaryWeb summit summary
Web summit summaryTeviTuakli
 
Assignment 2 T1.pdf
Assignment 2 T1.pdfAssignment 2 T1.pdf
Assignment 2 T1.pdfbillymooney1
 
Managing Your Brand in a Digital Environment (Part 1)
Managing Your Brand in a Digital Environment (Part 1)Managing Your Brand in a Digital Environment (Part 1)
Managing Your Brand in a Digital Environment (Part 1)KinConsult
 
Presentation Script Notes. HOW AUDIENCES USE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS IMPACT ON THE...
Presentation Script Notes. HOW AUDIENCES USE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS IMPACT ON THE...Presentation Script Notes. HOW AUDIENCES USE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS IMPACT ON THE...
Presentation Script Notes. HOW AUDIENCES USE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS IMPACT ON THE...MartaCaceres10
 
Advertising in 2020, tom morton's ipa talk, 24 january 2011
Advertising in 2020, tom morton's ipa talk, 24 january 2011Advertising in 2020, tom morton's ipa talk, 24 january 2011
Advertising in 2020, tom morton's ipa talk, 24 january 2011Tom Morton
 
Tương lai của sự sáng tạo trong quảng cáo
Tương lai của sự sáng tạo trong quảng cáo Tương lai của sự sáng tạo trong quảng cáo
Tương lai của sự sáng tạo trong quảng cáo MarketingTrips
 
Brands and engaging in the art of conversation final
Brands and engaging in the art of conversation finalBrands and engaging in the art of conversation final
Brands and engaging in the art of conversation finalhessiej.com
 
Top 10 future trends in social media engagement
Top 10 future trends in social media engagementTop 10 future trends in social media engagement
Top 10 future trends in social media engagementCustomer Centria
 
admapprizeShawandTan
admapprizeShawandTanadmapprizeShawandTan
admapprizeShawandTanJohn Shaw
 
There Is Definitely Something In The Air
There Is Definitely Something In The AirThere Is Definitely Something In The Air
There Is Definitely Something In The AirManoj Kandasamy
 
Curiosity Stop Special: Techcrunch Disrupt 2016
Curiosity Stop Special: Techcrunch Disrupt 2016Curiosity Stop Special: Techcrunch Disrupt 2016
Curiosity Stop Special: Techcrunch Disrupt 2016We Are Social
 
Larrys Presentation5.17. 1
Larrys Presentation5.17. 1Larrys Presentation5.17. 1
Larrys Presentation5.17. 1phileilerpr
 
Social Networks Before The Internet
Social Networks Before The InternetSocial Networks Before The Internet
Social Networks Before The InternetCarla Bennington
 

Ähnlich wie The Future Of [Social] Media (20)

Marketing Trends To Watch
Marketing Trends To WatchMarketing Trends To Watch
Marketing Trends To Watch
 
Y&R: 10 Snapshots from SXSWi 2015
Y&R: 10 Snapshots from SXSWi 2015Y&R: 10 Snapshots from SXSWi 2015
Y&R: 10 Snapshots from SXSWi 2015
 
Online communications
Online communicationsOnline communications
Online communications
 
Web summit summary
Web summit summaryWeb summit summary
Web summit summary
 
Assignment 2 T1.pdf
Assignment 2 T1.pdfAssignment 2 T1.pdf
Assignment 2 T1.pdf
 
Managing Your Brand in a Digital Environment (Part 1)
Managing Your Brand in a Digital Environment (Part 1)Managing Your Brand in a Digital Environment (Part 1)
Managing Your Brand in a Digital Environment (Part 1)
 
Design trends 2019
Design trends 2019Design trends 2019
Design trends 2019
 
Presentation Script Notes. HOW AUDIENCES USE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS IMPACT ON THE...
Presentation Script Notes. HOW AUDIENCES USE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS IMPACT ON THE...Presentation Script Notes. HOW AUDIENCES USE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS IMPACT ON THE...
Presentation Script Notes. HOW AUDIENCES USE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS IMPACT ON THE...
 
Advertising in 2020, tom morton's ipa talk, 24 january 2011
Advertising in 2020, tom morton's ipa talk, 24 january 2011Advertising in 2020, tom morton's ipa talk, 24 january 2011
Advertising in 2020, tom morton's ipa talk, 24 january 2011
 
Tương lai của sự sáng tạo trong quảng cáo
Tương lai của sự sáng tạo trong quảng cáo Tương lai của sự sáng tạo trong quảng cáo
Tương lai của sự sáng tạo trong quảng cáo
 
104 190322 Bookclub-The Power of Real-Time Social Media Marketing
104 190322 Bookclub-The Power of Real-Time Social Media Marketing104 190322 Bookclub-The Power of Real-Time Social Media Marketing
104 190322 Bookclub-The Power of Real-Time Social Media Marketing
 
Brands and engaging in the art of conversation final
Brands and engaging in the art of conversation finalBrands and engaging in the art of conversation final
Brands and engaging in the art of conversation final
 
Think forward 2017
Think forward 2017Think forward 2017
Think forward 2017
 
Top 10 future trends in social media engagement
Top 10 future trends in social media engagementTop 10 future trends in social media engagement
Top 10 future trends in social media engagement
 
admapprizeShawandTan
admapprizeShawandTanadmapprizeShawandTan
admapprizeShawandTan
 
There Is Definitely Something In The Air
There Is Definitely Something In The AirThere Is Definitely Something In The Air
There Is Definitely Something In The Air
 
Arts adminsocialmediamasterclassmar2016 day1-160207192550
Arts adminsocialmediamasterclassmar2016 day1-160207192550Arts adminsocialmediamasterclassmar2016 day1-160207192550
Arts adminsocialmediamasterclassmar2016 day1-160207192550
 
Curiosity Stop Special: Techcrunch Disrupt 2016
Curiosity Stop Special: Techcrunch Disrupt 2016Curiosity Stop Special: Techcrunch Disrupt 2016
Curiosity Stop Special: Techcrunch Disrupt 2016
 
Larrys Presentation5.17. 1
Larrys Presentation5.17. 1Larrys Presentation5.17. 1
Larrys Presentation5.17. 1
 
Social Networks Before The Internet
Social Networks Before The InternetSocial Networks Before The Internet
Social Networks Before The Internet
 

Mehr von Graeme Wood

Planning for networks
Planning for networksPlanning for networks
Planning for networksGraeme Wood
 
Google firestarters 8 - agency innovation
Google firestarters 8 - agency innovationGoogle firestarters 8 - agency innovation
Google firestarters 8 - agency innovationGraeme Wood
 
Weak force over great distance
Weak force over great distanceWeak force over great distance
Weak force over great distanceGraeme Wood
 
Facebook Open Graph
Facebook Open GraphFacebook Open Graph
Facebook Open GraphGraeme Wood
 
being culturally digital
being culturally digitalbeing culturally digital
being culturally digitalGraeme Wood
 
The Future Of [Social] Media
The Future Of [Social] MediaThe Future Of [Social] Media
The Future Of [Social] MediaGraeme Wood
 

Mehr von Graeme Wood (7)

Planning for networks
Planning for networksPlanning for networks
Planning for networks
 
Google firestarters 8 - agency innovation
Google firestarters 8 - agency innovationGoogle firestarters 8 - agency innovation
Google firestarters 8 - agency innovation
 
Weak force over great distance
Weak force over great distanceWeak force over great distance
Weak force over great distance
 
Cloud futures
Cloud futuresCloud futures
Cloud futures
 
Facebook Open Graph
Facebook Open GraphFacebook Open Graph
Facebook Open Graph
 
being culturally digital
being culturally digitalbeing culturally digital
being culturally digital
 
The Future Of [Social] Media
The Future Of [Social] MediaThe Future Of [Social] Media
The Future Of [Social] Media
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...AustraliaChapterIIBA
 
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking ApplicationsUpgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking ApplicationsIntellect Design Arena Ltd
 
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023Steve Rader
 
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024
 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024Stephan Koning
 
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptxIntroduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptxJemalSeid25
 
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizationsEntrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizationsP&CO
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.ukaroemirsr
 
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, OursDeveloping Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, OursKaiNexus
 
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerakTata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerakEditores1
 
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView
 
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access
 
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for BusinessQ2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for BusinessAPCO
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)tazeenaila12
 
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfAnhNguyen97152
 
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024Winbusinessin
 
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)Lviv Startup Club
 
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examplesamberjiles31
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...Khaled Al Awadi
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
 
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking ApplicationsUpgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
 
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
 
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024
 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024
 
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptxIntroduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
Introduction to The overview of GAAP LO 1-5.pptx
 
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizationsEntrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk
 
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, OursDeveloping Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
 
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerakTata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
 
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
 
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global Panel book-unlock 2024
 
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for BusinessQ2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
 
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
 
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
 
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
Michael Vidyakin: Introduction to PMO (UA)
 
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
 

The Future Of [Social] Media

  • 1. The Future of Social Media . We all use social media, some of us work with brands who use social media to greater or lesser effect. And we’ve all seen case studies, from media owners, distribution companies, colleagues and bloggers. So I’m not going to cover the same ground. I’ve been to a couple of conferences recently which were mainly meant for marketing folk, and the speakers were some of the top strategists working in social media, some techie, some agency and some brand marketers. And they were trying to explain a little bit further ahead than the case studies do, to really go into why stuff works on the internet. So I’ve tried to pull some of the strands together.…. What’s going on, What we can do to help our clients.
  • 2. And what we can do ourselves I’m going to talk a bit about how changing technology affects brands, so it is worth having a look at what a brand was. If you go back to when products like Coca Cola were launched, the brand was a symbol that you could trust and rely on to deliver quality and value for money. This worked because in the days before fast communications, the only people you could rely on for information were family and friends, and probably only those in your immediate vicinity. The brand became a mark of reputation – almost like a substitute for someone you know having told you that coke tasted good.
  • 3. We haven’t changed – our species has grown up around narrative. Linguistic development gave us the competitive advantage to out-evolve our closest competitors. Companionship and a sense of belonging are basic human requirements. We need to belong to tribes, whether through shared interests, family bonds, religious beliefs, or supporting the same team, as this feeds our sense of who we are – it makes us human. Technology just opens up wider groups of people who share our interests – the tribes become bigger, and better informed The idea of brands as a substitute for information grew up in the industrial age. The broadcast transmission of information belongs to this era too: it is a linear process
  • 4. where raw materials, labour and distribution are expensive, so needs to work on a huge scale in order to be effective. Linear production meant standards of living soared during the 20th century And this production line model was used as the basis for marketing products too. Like the in factories, raw materials (ad agencies) were expensive, so huge scale was needed at the start of the process. Remember, brands are substitutes for information and recommendation. And how did that work? Well how did that work? W.H. Lever was a soap manufacturer in the early 20th century. He made the very famous, and extremely over-used quote half his advertising budget was wasted, but he didn’t know which half. (the effective half was very effective though, and his company has since changed its name from Lever Brothers to Unilever). That has become a truism in our industry that we have spent vast sums of our clients’ research budgets trying to correct.
  • 5. And this is a picture of what we’ve come up with. If anyone has ever tried feeding an 8 month old baby then they will know that it is messy, there’s a lot of wastage, and it quickly becomes very frustrating that any sort of dialogue or reasoning won’t happen until some unspecified point in the future. But after a lot of work, the baby gets enough to keep going. And I’m sure you can guess the point that I’m labouring… this is pretty much the same as mass media advertising (thanks to Rohit Bhargava at Ogilvy for the analogy) We know it would be better if communication was a two- way idea, but for now we keep shovelling in the food. All
  • 6. that research to find out which 50% was wasted has confirmed that recommendation is the best way to convince people of something. And going back to our coca cola example, a brand is still a substitute for actual recommendation. But marketing is still means to create economic advantage. So has economics changed? (ignoring the last couple of months’ worth of banking disasters). Well here is a definition of ‘economics’, and this starts to explain where the change comes in. The key word is ‘scarce’. Because networked distribution changes everything This is Gordon Moore, who set up Intel. In 1965 he observed that although the number of transistors that
  • 7. could be placed on a circuit board had doubled every two years since the invention of the integrated circuits in 1958, and predicted that this exponential growth would continue unchecked. So far he has been proved right, and this law of exponential increase in computing speed and memory capacity is what has fundamentally changed our methods of communication. In the industrial age, media were expensive. Movies needed people and technology to create, and time, space and money to distribute and store. Newspapers were hugely labour intensive to write, expensive to physically print, and had to be distributed quickly to maintain demand. Increases in processing power and storage mean that production and storage is now virtually free. The internet means that distribution is virtually free. So information and entertainment is now free, while Economics relies on scarcity to define value. And a virtually infinite amount of information and entertainment is a drain on the finite amount of attention available to consume it. What is scarce, and therefore valuable, is attention. As people form networks, their attention becomes focused more on conversation – on non- commercial media. Familiarity breeds trust, as it did for the industrial era brands. So now we trust people we don’t know just as much as we those we do.
  • 8. In this environment where immediate open global communication with people that we don’t know but that we trust is the norm, there is no need for a substitute for recommendation. A brand is whatever people say it is. This is important, as it isn’t what brand marketers or the media say it is. Rather than being a one-way substitute for recommendation, as it has been all the way through the era of industrial marketing, a brand is now the sum total of all the recommendations that already exist for it. And this is a dialogue. As long as the positives outweigh the negatives, then the main thing a brand has to do is be talked about. And if the conversation is negative, then it is easy to find out using a whole range of free tools like Brand Tags, and to address the negatives. In an open conversational way. So individually we have more conversations in real life than online. It‘s just that online conversation is stored and indexed forever, and it happens globally and immediately. And recommendation online also helps your product’s sales directly. ‘Recommendation’ online is hyperlinked. When Google launched, the huge advantage it had over all the other search engines that were around at the time was that rather than just counting the number of time a word appeared on a page to give a relevancy score, it also
  • 9. included the number of links to that page – ie it counted how many times the page had been recommended. The total number of recommendations made up the page’s Reputation, or quality score. So it follows that to grow your market, a brand must be part of the conversation In fact, markets are conversations. I like the first quote, not just because it is true, but because it sort of proves the second. We forget how revolutionary the Cluetrain Manifesto was in 1999, and sure enough it took longer than two years for technology to change the world. But it is worth remembering when listening to geeks like me get overexcited about the future that this I’m probably underestimating the change in the next ten years
  • 10. Why? Well since the internet was invented, it has slowly grown to a point where it has roughly the same number of computers connected as there are cells in the human brain, and about the same number of links as there are connections. The number of synapses, or connections, in our brains is taken as a proxy for intelligence – it is basically processing power. So in 16 years between 1990, when Sir Tim Berners-Lee wrote the worldwide web, and 2007 when Kevin Kelly wrote this theory, the internet has developed the intelligence of one person. And as we’ve seen, Moore’s Law means that all the processors, and all the storage, and all the other capacity will each be doubling in capacity every two years. By 2040, the internet will have the brainpower of 4 billion people. The next big development will be the move from the Internet of data to the internet of things – everything can communicate with everything else. We are going to move over the next few years from millions of computers CONNECTED by the internet, to one huge computer that IS the internet. Every device will be a window into it. Your phone will be able to socially network with other people in the surrounding area, and only alert you if you need to know about them. This will obviously mean that a huge amount of data is flying around, and that where there is more information, there is less attention. So brands will have to work even harder to earn that attention. Most of the time they will not be able to communicate with us unless they are invited into our digital life by our devices. As an example, if you switch on your phone, only ads that are better than the programmes you want to see will have been showing up as recommended for you. You will not need to look any further than your phone’s recommendations, as it knows far more than you could ever have time to about what you want to watch. Gaining attention by interrupting people starts to look a bit outdated.
  • 11. So the result in a completely connected, always on world, is that the internet is like air – always there, but in the background. People are starting to worry about Googlism, where they are no longer able to remember things because they have come to rely so much on just being able to search. I get withdrawal symptoms if I am away from a Wifi connection for very long. But is this reliance on an information system really such a bad thing? Remember, the internet is not a medium, it is a way of organising and structuring information. To have more chance of unlocking its potential, we need to think of it in terms of other systems for structuring information. For example, the alphabet. We haven’t worried about relying on the alphabet to store our information for the last 1500 years. And we don’t use the alphabet as an advertising medium. Well, we do, obviously – copy is written in words, ideas are created and sold in words. But it is something so fundamental that it goes on in the background. If we think of technology in terms of media channels like TV and radio, our frame of reference is too narrow
  • 12. Now I don’t think that very much of that is futuristic… As sci-fi author William Gibson said, and every advertising blogger has repeated, the future is already here, it just isn’t evenly distributed yet. I can already screen out all TV advertising, and all online advertising, search and display. But I don’t, cos I work in advertising. Most people don’t know how. Yet. Historically there was an understanding that advertising was a necessary evil, because it paid for content, and content was expensive. Now content is free and on YouTube (this is why YouTube are struggling to make money out of the old media economic model). Google’s mission is to organise the world’s information…. And content is just information.
  • 13. Change has never happened faster than it is doing, and change will also never happen this slowly again. So it is important to understand what has changed and what hasn’t Are the ones on the right technology? Are the ones on the left museum pieces? Technology is a relative concept - just a word for anything that wasn’t invented when you were born. And what will media look like? Media is just the means for distributing information, and this is one of Chris Anderson’s examples of what has changed. Hollywood was based on the fact that there were a limited number of really successful movies, after which demand fell quickly away to zero. Actually turns out it wasn’t that people only liked a few movies, rather that the distribution system was really inefficient at matching supply to demand. Although over 10,000 movies were being professionally made each year the capacity of US cinemas was only 120 movies – so they created the concept of the Blockbuster – the syndicated, extended, marketed extravaganza.. Now technology is able to cater for demand, the Blockbuster model starts to look very inefficient.
  • 14. This is an image of the Blockbuster model from social media consultant David Cushman. Messages are one- way, and value is all about the number of eyeballs. This is industrial information. But what about when the audience BECOME the media channel – when they can create and distribute through networked conversation without relying on a broadcaster? And it is harder to interrupt a conversation than it is to interrupt content. Brands will have to become part of the conversation.
  • 15. What does this all mean? The role of a brand in the age of industrial marketing no longer exists Attention is scarce and expensive. Media is not We already have tools to avoid advertising. They will increase exponentially And what to do about it? Understand that all media is social. The revolution will be hyperlinked. We are now the producers and distributors of media. And there’s more of people than there are media outlets. Change is only going to get faster, so the main thing for a brand to do is jump into it. I’m going to try and explain without referring to the same old case studies again Confucius wrote this 2,500 years ago and it is still just as true today. What has changed is that the involving bit was always difficult, so as advertisers had to show & tell. Technology makes involving easier, and as we’ve seen, also make it much easier to avoid the show and tell stuff. If something is entertaining and involving, we will understand it and talk about it. This is the first thing brands can do to be part of the conversation
  • 16. No, really. We are. When all media was mass, demographics made sense. Now a lot of media is becoming about one to one conversations, there’s no need to deal in averages any more. Remember, the average UK resident has one breast and one testicle. We could of course track and monitor everything that people do online, so that we can interrupt people in new and more relevant ways. But that is still jumping straight into the middle of the conversation. If a brand is a sum of all the recommendations that exist for it, then all the brilliant targeting in the world won’t make up for crap products or poor customer service.
  • 17. But won’t that all just be a bit half-arsed? A guy called Bill Buxton, who wrote Sketching User Experience, talks about an art college ceramics professor, who comes in on the first day of class and divides the students into two sections. He tells one half of the class that their final grade will be based exclusively on the volume of their production; the more they make, the better their grade. The professor tells the other half of the class that they will be graded more traditionally, based solely on the quality of their best piece. At the end of the semester, the professor discovered that the students who were focused on making as many pots as possible also ended up creating the best pots, much better than the pots made by the students who spent all semester trying to create that one perfect pot. I like this analogy as it is what the more forward thinking brands have been doing. Testing everything. Orange’s Internet Balloon Race might have been a huge success, but equally, their island in Second Life looked great and had no visitors. So they are investing more in ideas like Internet Balloon races at the moment. Actually that’s an interesting example for media agencies to take note of – the balloon race is an example of advertising that media owners want to carry for free – 3000 sites, including the Sun and Vodafone, asked to be included. No media budget changed hands.
  • 18. Because we don’t ignore advertising…. we just ignore shit advertising – it’s become really easy. Anyone know what OTHER blender ads look like? Thought not. Fail little and often "..our company's success rate runs between 50 and 60 percent. About half of our new products succeed. That's as high as we want the success rate to be. If we try to make it any higher, we'll be tempted to err on the side of caution” A.G. Latley – CEO, Procter & Gamble So the real step change for clients is about not trying to build that perfect pot – it’s about not worrying about the bad ones. Charles Darwin said “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.” We know that species of animal can remain unchanged for millennia, and then suddenly evolve in a few generations as their environment changes. As the internet ushers out the era of industrial marketing, we need to help our clients avoid erring on the side of caution. The first seven are print, audio, cinema, radio, TV, internet and mobile. As I paraphrased from Kevin Kelly, soon these
  • 19. will all just be screens into the internet, and the mobile will presumably be the most important screen because it is always with us and always on. WE are the distribution, WE are the content, WE are the 'user journey', WE are how messages are transmitted. WE are the medium and the media carried by it (again, borrowing from David Cushman) And where does that leave the things we have watched and listened to? This is what TV was all about – the watercooler moment. This is why music drives popular culture. Now back in the early days of commercial TV, when people were first working out what to put on it, how it differed from press and radio, how you might use it to advertise, FMCG brands realised that there wasn’t enough of the right kind of shows to target their housewife target audiences. So they got together with the broadcasters and created regular chunks of real life drama that they could advertise households around. Because of the way these shows came into being, and the content of the ads around them, they were dismissively referred to as ‘soap operas’. Today NBC are setting up social viewing rooms to allow people to connect with other fans of shows in real time, and schedule their non-scheduled viewing around when
  • 20. their friends are watching (whether or not they are friends they have met). In the 50s, value was in content that appealed to mass audience. Today it is in the network that talks about that content. Content isn't king... If I sent you to a desert island and gave you the choice of taking your friends or your movies, you'd choose your friends -- if you chose the movies, we'd call you a sociopath. Conversation is king. Content is just something to talk about Cory Doctorow, BoingBoing post 2006 Because today, we are not limited to 2 TV channels or the radio as a choice of our evening’s entertainment. The advertising industry grew up on the basis that if it interrupted your viewing, there was very little that you could do about it. When the internet came along, it repackaged those expensive TV ads into small screen formats, and created something called a microsite, an online version of the millennium dome that cost lots but contained nothing. Content may “just” be something to talk about, but the value in a network economy is not in the content, it is in the talk. Using advertising to generate PR isn’t a new idea, it’s just much easier now. Mainly because ‘PR’ didn’t used to be
  • 21. true. It wasn’t Public relations, it was media relations. Now the media and the public is becoming the same thing, PR is becoming real and therefore has to be transparent and true. Anyway…these are the ads that made the careers of the Saatchi brothers and Trevor Beattie. None of them ran for long, and not much was spent buying media, but they were all about getting people talking. Back then, this meant do something so different or risque that the national news media talked about it, which meant everyone else found out about it. Now, it means the same except there is no longer a requirement for the national media. It isn’t a top-down broadcast economy any more. But being talked about is still about creating things that are remarkable. As Seth Godin says: a brown cow isn’t interesting. If you have a purple cow, people will talk about it. Whether that is great advertising, exemplary customer service, a perfect product, even brilliant packaging, if people talk about it, then it will mutate and spread.
  • 22. Mutating and spreading is what it is all about. The concept of owning copyright on something that costs nothing to produce or distribute is fairly odd one. In the networked world, intellectual property is called reputation, and reputation is a result of sharing. Most businesses that relied on copyright during the industrial marketing era have realised that the world has changed: the quote on the slide is from the CEO of Disney. But it is more important to realise how things will change from now. For example, the Guardian became the first traditional newspaper publisher to publish full RSS feeds last month. This frees up all their content to be shared, embedded, linked and remixed by anyone that wants to. The New York Times has gone one step further, and released a number of APIs – if you don’t know what one of those is, think of Facebook apps or Google Maps. They allow any developer to build their data into new applications. To share and re-distribute is now the goal of business. Brands need to open up and copy publishers, because the user is the destination, not the website
  • 23. And part of opening up is treating the brand less seriously. It is difficult to work with people who are co-creating stuff around your brand, if you have a restrictive set of brand guidelines. Now if people are interested in your brand, then they will create and share around it regardless of what guidelines you have. The value in a networked economy is in what is shared. So if you want to take full advantage of this value as a brand, you need to lighten up and accept it. In fact, you really need to help and encourage it. People form networks for fun as much as for support, and brands that want to join in have to be able to do fun in a human voice.
  • 24. And whatever voice you use, the most important thing for brands to remember is that listening is more important. Brands aren’t good at listening because they’ve never had the opportunity to practice before. Industrial marketing is too expensive to do as a dialogue, so brands had to rely on focus groups as a proxy. This tended to be conversation in a marketing voice, not in a human one. It was also only a quick chat, not an ongoing conversation Dialogue is an ongoing process – brands will be found out if they screw up at any stage of their relationship with people. Comcast had a similar reputation in the US to NTL/Virgin in the UK: the ISP equivalent of Ryanair. Or at least it was until one bloke in their minimal customer service department realised that he could cut through the bureaucracy and speak to people directly and in a human voice on Twitter. Google ‘comcast customer service’ and this is in the first three results. Markets are conversations, and marketing is customer service
  • 25. So if brands are just the sum total of all the conversations that they are involved with. and content is just information, and all information is free to Google and to the Single Big Computer that all our screens are going to peer into, and media is no longer scarce and it is now attention that is valuable. This is why really nearly free is now a viable business model. IBM for example used to be in the computer business. As we’ve seen, there isn’t much value producing hardware any more, so they moved to the consultancy business. And a lot of what they do is given away by an research organisation called the IBM Institute for Business Value. This is all research from top level academics, that would cost thousands of pounds a few years ago. By giving this away, their content reaches the attention of more potential customers than other consultancies. They develop reputation and authority. In the past, we were what we owned. Now we are what we share. Closer to home, anyone in a media agency who has tried to present social media to a client soon realises the value of sharing. The only robust global survey on social media usage was conducted by Universal McCann. Rather than
  • 26. locking this expensive research away for their own clients’ use, it has been widely shared to planning bloggers, and distributed to agencies round the world. If I try and present any facts about social media to a client, I will refer to our competitor’s market leading research, and position Universal McCann as the authority on social media. So if image isn’t enough to create business advantage any more, and both the production and distribution of media are close enough to free to be done by anyone, how do you stand out enough to build reputation? How about looking at what isn’t abundant? Creating experiences. Standing for something. Being generous. Orange Rockcorps connects worthy causes with willing volunteers (whether they are digging a hole or playing at the Royal Albert Hall), it connects music fans with live music, it CONNECTS. It puts the brand at the centre of a network – enabling the network, creating experience and doing good.
  • 27. Listen to what people want. Enable it. Commit don’t campaign, and remember communication is a two-way process. So what can we learn from the most expensive marketing campaign in the history of the world? From the moment he became the Republican nominee, McCain focused on one thing – making sure he had people’s vote on 4th November. Obama on the other hand had been asking for people who supported him to give $10 since the start of 2007. The 4m people who did remained in contact through email, through the campaign Ning network mybarackobama, and via Twitter, Facebook, etc. When
  • 28. the time came to ask people to come out and vote, there were 4m people ready to make 5 phone calls each to undecided voters when they were asked to. The campaign didn’t need to rely on overworked campaigners, just millions of volunteers doing a little bit each. And those donations that started them off meant that the Democrat campaign could outspend the Republicans by 3 to 1 in battleground states. (and do something different for half an hour of mainstream primetime television, as the future isn’t evenly distributed yet) There’s lots of people out there who know a lot more about this than me – these are some of the ones whose ideas I borrowed, mashed up, expanded upon and generally stole. Conversations start with listening, so listen to what these people are saying before conversing with your clients! http://graewood.blogspot.com/