3. SEBI Bhavan, Mumbai
headquarters
Agency overview
Formed 12 April 1992
Government
Jurisdiction
of India
Mumbai,
Headquarters
Maharashtra
Employees 525 (2009)
Agency U. K. Sinha,
executive Chairman
Website
3
www.sebi.gov.in
4. Since the empowerment of (SEBI) through an Act of Parliament in
1992, it has taken initiatives that have transformed the market
fundamentally
• Market capitalization
• Number of listed firms
• Trading volumes and turnover both in the spot and futures markets.
The fastest growing and well-developed asset management
businesses in the
world.
SEBI was established to strengthen the oversight of the securities
market in
India in the wake of a securities scam that surfaced in 1992.
4
5. ROLE OF SEBI IN PRIMARY MARKET
3 main Objectives of SEBI
Entry Norms
Track record of dividend payment for minimum 3 yrs preceding the issue
Already listed companies – when post issue net worth becomes more
than 5 times the pre-issue net worth
For manufacturing company not having such track record- appraise
project by a public financial institution or a schedule commercial bank
For corporate body – 5 public shareholders for every Rs. 1lac of the net
capital offer made to the public
Banks - 2 yrs of profitability for issue above par
5
6. Promoters’ Contribution
Should not be less than 20% of issued capital
Receiving of promoters’ contribution
Lock in period as per SEBI
Cases of non-under written public issues
Book building
SEBI recommends two-tier under writing system
One of the modes of public issues through prospectus
role of syndicate members and book runner
Minimum 30 centers
6
7. Allocation of shares
Minimum application of shares
Reservation for small investors
Allotment of securities
Market Intermediaries
Licensing of merchant bankers
Licensing of underwriters, registrars, transfer agent etc..
Merchant bankers net worth – Rs. 5 cr
Segregate fund based from fee based activities
7
9. THREE CATEGORIES OF DISCLOSURE
Disclosure at the time of a public offering,
On-going or periodic disclosure after listing of
securities.
Transaction-related disclosures.
SEBI enhanced the disclosures required of a
company at the time of a public offering by building on
the requirements in the Companies Act, 19566 .
9
10. DISCLOSURE
SEBI suffered from three principal shortcomings.
1. Low frequency, at once a year
2. Insufficient and poorly administered deterrents
against non compliance.
3. A common set of disclosure obligations for
companies with limited as well as widely
distributed ownership.
10
11. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Improved standards of corporate governance in
India among the listed companies
Role of the Board of Directors and directors
individually have been dealt under the Companies
Act 1956
SEBI’s initiatives starting with the deliberations of
two Committees in succession culminated in the
introduction of Clause 49
11
12. ITEMS COVERED UNDER CLAUSE 49
Ensuring independence of the Board and disclosure of their
compensation
Ensuring correctness, sufficiency, and credibility of disclosures
Requirement of financial literacy among members of the audit
committee and expertise in accounting management among
them
Whistle-blower policy
Requirement of a formal risk management policy
Certification of financial and cash flow statements by the
CEO/CFO to the Board
Quarterly reporting to the stock exchanges on compliance with
the requirements of every provision of Clause
12
13. MARKET FOR CORPORATE CONTROL
Takeover Code Criticisms :
1. Poor drafting
2. Not favourable to hostile acquisitions
13
14. TRADING MECHANISMS
Indian stock exchanges adopted an electronic
trading system
1. Reduced manipulation of prices
2. Ensured that investors received time-based
priority and correct prices for their trades; and
3. Faster Operations of NSE and The Stock
Exchange.
14
15. CRITICISMS TO THE TRADING MECHANISM
Prior to NSE and BSE going national, the
operations of stock exchanges were limited to
geographical regions.
As a result the share of trade on regional stock
exchanges dropped steadily from 57 per cent in
1994-95 to 4 per cent in 2002-03.
The fact that SEBI had to exert pressure on some
of the exchanges to switch to electronic trading 15
16. DEMATERIALISATION
FIIs started in 1992 and setting up of Mutual Funds in the private
sector in 1994.
And after that SEBI started with Dematerialization in Jan 1998.
SEBI announced a compulsory of Dematerialization for all issuer
and IPOs by September 2011
16
17. BENEFITS OF DEMATERIALIZATION
Greater liquidity due to the withdrawal of the requirement of minimum
trading lot sizes and reduced “no-delivery” period .
No loss or risk on account of mutilation or loss of list.
Shorter periods of book closure for corporate actions such as dividends
payments, rights or bonus issues.
Eliminated delays in transfer that were intended to withhold transfers so as
to create an artificial shortage of list in the market.
17
18. MARKET INTEGRITY AND INSIDER
TRADING
It is essential those who possess an informational advantage do not
exploit the same to derive pecuniary gains for themselves.
SEBI’s first enactment to curb insider trading , 992 did not make much
progress due to poor enforcement.
Requiring listed companies, intermediaries, and advisors to set up
internal systems for preventing insider trading and reporting on
compliance or otherwise to SEBI.
Manipulative practices are usually resort to:
1. Create a false market
2. Push the price of the securities down to unwarrantedly low levels
“insider trading has utterly no place in any fair-minded 18
law abiding economy.” --Mr. Arthur Levitt
19. CONCLUSION
Adequately empowered and independent regulator.
All-round improvement in the institutional framework.
Important processes have been regulated such as takeover
activities, insider trading, manipulative practices, issuance of employee
share options and so on.
SEBI has mandated an enormous increase in the flow of information
at the time of listing, after listing and relating to the trade.
19
Disclosure and flow of information fall into three categories,namely, disclosure at the time of a public offering,on-going or periodic disclosure after listing ofsecurities and transaction-related disclosures. SEBI enhancedthe disclosures required of a company at the timeof a public offering by building on the requirements inthe Companies Act, 19566 . The increase in disclosureswas necessitated by “the quantitative growth of themarket and the freedom to price issues had also raisedquestions about the quality of issues entering the market.”(SEBI, 1996). SEBI’s disclosure standards are notlimited to accounting information presented in the prospectus.It extends to other issue-related communicationssuch as advertisements. As a result, the disclosurerequirements relating to an issue and currently in vogueare a far cry from the relatively rudimentary requirementsspecified in the Companies Act.The continuing disclosure regime under the CompaniesAct that was in force prior to the establishment of SEBIsuffered from three principal shortcomings (i) low frequency,at once a year (ii) insufficient and poorly administereddeterrents against non compliance; and (iii)a common set of disclosure obligations for companieswith limited as well as widely distributed ownership.In order to improve the frequency of disclosure, SEBIconstituted a committee in 1996 to examine the questionof continuing disclosure7