The Institution of Civil Engineers Professional Review is for those wishing to become a Chartered, Incorporated or Technician Engineer. This is an explanation of the Review process to graduate mentors (SCE & DE) at ICE, London

1. The Reviewer’s perspective
Eur Ing Ian Jenkinson BSc MBA CEng FICE FIMechE MCIM

2. If a candidate can do all this ...

3. We guess they will clear the bar
So its not about winning ... ... its avoiding a crash

4. Match or Mismatch ... ?
Reviewer Candidate

5. Sponsor links to Project Report

6. What really adds value?
good Reports ...
• Brief project description
• What they personally did
• Problems encountered
• What they learned
... or obscure Appendices?

7. Review should confirm the application
• their Reports
• their knowledge
• their understandingns
• good Q&A to cover
the ‘Attributes’

8. The Presentation
Slow death by bullet point ...
• Blah blah
• Blah blah
• Blah blah
• Etc ......
... or an explanation to
colleagues?

9. Neither the 3rd degree nor ‘adult to child’

10. Questions & Answers
We ask open questions ... ... so explain / show / point

11. Draw sketches to explain

12. Evidence brought together
• Sponsor reports
• Experience Report
• Project Report
• PDP & CPD records
• Q&A during the review

13. Written Exercise
Candidate can almost define it Reviewers usually respond

14. How do we decide Pass/Fail ?
PASS because superheros ...
... PASS because of their
potential
FAIL because of B***S**T