Open Access: what is it and what do I need to do? (November 2013) slides. Delivered as part of the Durham University Researcher Development Programme. Further Training available at https://www.dur.ac.uk/library/research/training/
Publishing your research: Open Access (introduction & overview)
1. Publishing your
Research: Open Access
What is it and what requirements do
you need to meet?
James Bisset james.bisset@durham.ac.uk
Academic Liaison Librarian (Research Support)
2. Session outline
- What is “Open Access”?
- Paywalls, Terminology, Examples
- Why make your research Open Access?
- Benefits for authors / Benefits for readers
- What Open Access requirements are there?
- OA mandates, identifying your options, DRO
- Searching for open access articles
- Repositories, OA Journals, Search engines
8. Some Open
Access
articles may
also allow full
or limited re-use
of the
content in the
publication...
9. “... free availability on the public internet, permitting any
users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or
link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for
indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for
any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or
technical barriers other than those inseparable from
gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on
reproduction and distribution, and the only role for
copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control
over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly
acknowledged and cited.“
http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
Budapest Open Access Initiative.
13. Why a repository? Why can’t I do what
I want with an article I have written?
- 53% of publishers request a copyright transfer
- 20.8% of publishers request a licence to publish
- 19.6% of publishers request a copyright transfer
would on request provide a licence to publish
document instead
http://www.alpsp.org/Ebusiness/ProductCatalog/Product.aspx?ID=44
Scholarly Publishing Practice 3 (2008).
14. Why a repository? Why can’t I do what
I want with an article I have written?
- Elsevier issued 2,800 take-down notices at articles
hosted by their authors on academia.edu
- Followed by notices to Calgary University & Harvard
University to remove content from their servers.
- Elsevier is within its legal rights to do so.
http://wapo.st/19BbeRx
“How one publisher is stopping academics from sharing their
research” (19 December 2013) Washington Post.
16. Impact Factor = 10.353
- 14th of 290 in Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
- 1st, Cell , allows Green Open Access, no embargo
period & Gold Open Access (Elsevier/Cell Press)
- 4th of 47 in Evolutionary Biology
- 1st, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, allows Green Open
Access, no embargo period (Elsevier/Trends)
- 8th of 161 in Genetics & Hereditary
- 1st, Nature Reviews: Genetics allows Green Open
Access, embargo period of 6 months (Nature)
25. “on average across the NHS, [only]
about a third of relevant journals
were available free at the point of
use”
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in
Heading for the Open Road: costs and benefits of transitions in
scholarly communications, RIN, PRC, Wellcome Trust, RLUK and
JISC, 2011.
26. “many researchers … in smaller and
less research-intensive institutions
… do not have access to a sufficiently-wide
range of titles”
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in Access to
scholarly content: gaps and barriers, RIN, Publishing Research
Consortium and JISC, 2011.
27. “across central Government and its
agencies, some 17% of relevant articles
are available free at the point of use.”
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in Heading for
the Open Road: costs and benefits of transitions in scholarly
communications, RIN, PRC, Wellcome Trust, RLUK and JISC, 2011.
28. “lack of access … may mean that
advice and inputs to policy-making
are delayed or incomplete."
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in Rightscom.
Benefits of Open Access to Scholarly Research Outputs to the Public
Sector, Report for the Open Access Implementation Group, , 2012
29. “the voluntary sector … [often has to]
rely on reports from research
organisations and Government
departments"
http://bit.ly/MnfGEY
Finch Report (June 2012), from data originally reported in Office for
Public Management, Benefits of open access to scholarly research
for VCS organisations, JISC 2012.
30. “ Every year, JSTOR turns away almost
150 million attempts to gain access
to articles...”
http://bit.ly/1grt1MV
“JSTOR Tests Free, Read-Only Access to Some Articles”
(13 January 2012), Chronicle of Higher Education.
31. why?
“Because the cost of the current publication
system cannot continue to be supported
without change.”
32. “journal prices have risen four
times faster than inflation since
the mid-1980's”
Peter Suber, Research Professor of Philosophy at Earlham College and Director of the
Harvard Open Access Project, quoting research conducted from ARL Statistics 2005-
06, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C.
33. According to The Economist,
Elsevier made $1.1 billion in profit
in 2010 for a profit margin of 36%.
Taylor & Francis’s reported their
own profit margin of 25% in their
2010 Annual report
“The Price of information” Economist Feb. 4th 2012 .
http://www.economist.com/node/21545974
p19 of Taylor and Francis’s annual report and financial statement 2010,
http://www.informa.com/documents/INF2570%20AR10%20cover%20AW05.pdf
34. 2010 Operating Profit Margins
Tesco 5%
News Corp 7%
British Gas 9%
BMW 12%
Coca Cola 22%
Apple 35%
Elsevier 36%
“Why have so many academics decided to boycott Elsevier”
http://www.slideshare.net/scottsne/ecvp2012symposiumslideshare
35.
36. why?
“Because it can boost the visibility and
broaden access to your research.”
37. Benefits for authors...
• 4633 articles across ecology, applied
mathematics, sociology and economics.
• 2280 were open access, and had an
average citation count of 9.04
• 2353 were subscriptions journals, and had
an average citation count of 5.76.
Norris, M. (2008) “The citation advantage of open access articles” Thesis. Available
at https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/4089
38. Benefits for authors...
Terras, M. (2011) “What happens when you tweet an Open Access Paper” Melissa
Terras’ Blog. Available at http://melissaterras.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/what-happens-
when-you-tweet-open-access.html
39. Benefits for authors...
By October 2012, the OA
version had seen nearly 3
times more downloads than
the version sitting behind a
subscription paywall.
Terras, M. (2011) “What happens when you tweet an Open Access Paper” Melissa
Terras’ Blog. Available at http://melissaterras.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/what-happens-
when-you-tweet-open-access.html
40. Benefits for authors...
“My gold access papers have huge downloads,
one staying in the top 20 for over 3 months”
Dr David Selby, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University (January 2014)
“the editor of the journal has emailed me to
tell me that my article has been one of the
most downloaded in that year”
Dr Andy Byford, School of Modern Languages and Cultures, Durham University
(August 2014)
41. Benefits for authors...
“"I am still surprised and continually
delighted to find many of my works in
DRO have been downloaded by far more
people than ever bought the volumes.”
Dr Michael Crang, Department of Geography, Durham University
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/testimonials/
43. Why High School Students Need Access to Research:
http://youtu.be/prTHDfqP_ng
44.
45. why?
“Because it can boost the visibility and
broaden access to your research.”
46. Because the cost of the current publication
system cannot continue to be supported
without change.
Because it can boost the visibility and broaden
access to your research.
Because people want to read it and use it but
they aren’t able to.
Because you can.
49. Things to do...
• If your research is funded, check what the
funder requires..
• Also check what your employer, or any national
assessments require...
• Once you have identified how you want to
publish your research, and where, check what
options that publisher allows.
• Once you have publications accepted, make
sure you do what is needed to make your
publications open access.
52. Not limited to RCUK and
Wellcome Trust…
- Action on Hearing Loss
- Arthritis Research UK
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer
- British Heart Foundation
- Cancer Research UK
- Department of Health
- Dunhill Medical Trust
- European Commission
- European Research Council
- JISC
- Marie Curie Cancer Care
- Motor Neuron Disease Association
- Parkinsons UK
54. Authors must…
• include a statement providing details of
funding supporting the research;
• include a statement, if appropriate, on how
underpinning research data can be
accessed.
• publish in journals which are compliant
with Research Council policy on Open
Access;
55. Is the journal compliant?
In order to be deemed compliant with RCUK Policy, a journal must
either:
“[GOLD] provide, via its own website, immediate and unrestricted
access to the final published version of the paper, which should be
made available using the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)
licence. This may involve payment of an ‘Article Processing Charge’
(APC) to the publisher.“
or...
[GREEN] permit the author to deposit their "final Accepted
Manuscript in any repository, without restriction on non-commercial
re-use and within a defined period. No APC will be
payable to the publisher."
56. Clarifications:
Green Gold
Embargo periods
No Gold OA option
AHRC & ESRC: 12 months
Other RCs: 6 months
Gold OA option
AHRC & ESRC: 24 months
MRC: 6 months
Other RCs: 12 months
59. Durham University Policy
• Durham Open Access Policy
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/du_oa_policy_summary.pdf
“Authors must provide an electronic copy of all peer-reviewed journal
articles and conference papers published since 1st January 2013
within 3 months of acceptance for publication for deposit in Durham
Research Online (DRO)”
“Publications referred to for consideration in promotion applications:
where published since 1st January 2013 the author’s final peer-reviewed
manuscript must have been deposited in DRO”
62. “Outputs submitted to the post-2014 REF must
be made available in an open-access form”
- applies to journal articles & conference
proceedings
- accepted for publication after 1st April 2016
- deposit the published version or final
peer-reviewed manuscript in a repository
“no later than 3 months after acceptance”.
- maximum embargo of 12 months (24
months for social sciences & humanities)
65. What are you permitted
to do, and who’s
permission do you
need?
66. Check what
options your
journal offers /
the terms of any
publishing
agreement.
- Sherpa/Romeo
- Journal/Publisher
agreement and guidelines
67. Your journal / publisher does not
permit self-archiving or offer a
paid open access option?
Ask them – it is your research.
You may be able to negotiate (esp
if your funder requires you to
take action).
71. Durham Research Online
• 12,508 records in DRO
- 5,903 full text (47%)
- 282 further records embargoed (2%)
• Durham Open Access Policy
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/du_oa_policy_summary.pdf
• Add bibliographic details; Tick the box; Attach
your final accepted manuscript.
72. Durham Research Online
Dept Records
in DRO
Full text
deposited
% of
records
with full
text
Publisher
does not
permit
%
where
no OA
option
by
jounal
% that
should be
achievable
to make OA
via DRO
Biological/
Biomedical
347 111 31.99 47 13.54 86.46
Chemistry 398 125 31.41 123 30.90 69.10
Computer
154 80 51.95 8 5.19 94.81
Sciences
Earth Sciences 319 73 22.88 36 11.29 88.71
Engineering 595 246 41.34 59 9.92 90.08
Mathematics 483 242 50.10 45 9.32 90.68
Physics 839 534 63.65 96 11.44 88.56
Psychology 409 134 32.76 44 10.76 89.24
73. Support at Durham
• Checking compliance of journals (library)
• Managing and maintaining Durham
Research Online (Durham’s institutional
repository)
• RCUK Block Grant (£276,578 for
2013/14, £325,386 for 2014/15)
• Reporting back to RCUK/HEFCE
Focus on published literature, specifically journal literature where citation analysis tools more developed.
Open Access also currently in the UK is focussed on journal literature, although there are moves from HEFRCE and RCUK to look beyond this in the future, and indeed in Australia the Australian Research Councils already are.
Most of us in academia get very used to instant access to published research at our finger tips… even when not immediate, we can often request our library gets content for us through document delivery or inter-library loan services at discounted or waived fee-rates.
What is not “Open Access”? This...
(Sadly ironic example… publisher amended this shortly after it was picked up and circulated by academics)
There is some division over the issue of whether rights of re-use are needed now, or will develop once ‘access’ has been firmly established.
1st in JCRs for History is American Historical Review. Complicated: Green option, no gold option from owners, but is one form publisher. 24 month embargo – fine for REF, not for many funders.
For those in arts and humanities
http://www.economist.com/node/21545974
http://www.informa.com/documents/INF2570%20AR10%20cover%20AW05.pdf (p19 of annual report and financial statement 2010)
Springer = 33.9%, Wiley = 42%
http://www.economist.com/node/21545974
http://www.informa.com/documents/INF2570%20AR10%20cover%20AW05.pdf (p19 of annual report and financial statement 2010)
http://www.economist.com/node/21545974
http://www.informa.com/documents/INF2570%20AR10%20cover%20AW05.pdf (p19 of annual report and financial statement 2010)
Reminder – do not bulk out reference lists.
But… reference lists make sense in how authors discover and evaluate research (citation searching, related links in web of science based upon correlation of reference lists and citing articles).
Reminder – do not bulk out reference lists.
But… reference lists make sense in how authors discover and evaluate research (citation searching, related links in web of science based upon correlation of reference lists and citing articles).
Reminder – do not bulk out reference lists.
But… reference lists make sense in how authors discover and evaluate research (citation searching, related links in web of science based upon correlation of reference lists and citing articles).
Reminder – do not bulk out reference lists.
But… reference lists make sense in how authors discover and evaluate research (citation searching, related links in web of science based upon correlation of reference lists and citing articles).
Reminder – do not bulk out reference lists.
But… reference lists make sense in how authors discover and evaluate research (citation searching, related links in web of science based upon correlation of reference lists and citing articles).
Pancreatic Cancer.
Applied methods already tested (and published and OA on pubmed) for breast and prostrate cancer, then applied to a tangential field of study. Is a bit of a sensational title, but the question is… would this have been done if he had not had free access to the research.
Video has him saying that he would not have had the idea if the articles had been behind the paywalls of up to $100 that other articles are.
After c.15 minutes
Ask class if they have any concerns, or have heard any concerns about “Open Access publishing”
If you are funded, you have signed an agreement with the funder. That agreement could cover anything the funder expects you to achieve or deliver by the end of the project.
Wellcome Trust example: if you do not meet OA requirements, you will have funding withheld AND be unable to use non-compliant publications as evidence in subsequent grant applications.
These funders are just some of those which have an open access requirement built into their funding contracts. Some require deposit in a repository, some require publishing in an open access journal. These are mostly European and UK funders… there are many others outside of the UK which have similar open access requirements attached to any funding they provide, with varying degrees of reporting enforcement in place.
Primarily publically funded research councils, government departments and health funders. But many other funders have advocated support for Open Access, if not setting out any policy requirements (British Academy for one).
Example of Harvard – reaction to increased costs of journal subscriptions
Example of Liege and Durham – items must be in DRO for consideration for promotion and probation (qualifier on implementation at Durham).
Only 4% of REF2014-submitted journals have embargoes longer than 12/24m.
In built exceptions into REF policy. Not clear on how applied, but expected to be a minority of cases.
Only 4% of REF2014-submitted journals have embargoes longer than 12/24m.
This is your research.
You should publish it where you wish to publish it.
If you fundamentally disagree with open access, then despite the fact that I and others may disagree with you, that is you prerogative (but perhaps do not go seeking funding from public bodies or any funder which requires research to be made accessible).
Check publishing agreements...
Demo: Sherpa Romeo... Polymer, Nature, Theory Culture & Society
Two options, depending on your personal opinion:-
- look for your journals in your subject area, check what open access options they offer - look for open access journals in your subject area, check what standing they have to their peers.
Ask students to check if they have access to the staff profile system.
- (2,686 could be OA but author has not provided text) (21%)
Reiterate point… REF probably looking at either a target of 70-80% open access, or a 100% target with exceptions…
Overview of Twitter.. Don’t show how to create account – on handout.
Headlined / about
Profile and home page
@ Connections page (mentions and interactions)
Search function (tweets, users, lists)