Open Access Essential at The University of Queensland
1. Welcome
Open Access Essentials
23 October 2013
Presented by
Lisa Kruesi, Associate Director
Andrew Heath, Manager UQ eSpace
Helen Connick, Manager Research Data Collections
2. The Session
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Background
ARC & NHMRC Open Access Policies
Scholarly Publishing Landscape
Open Access Service
UQ eSpace Developments
Roles, Responsibilities
Data Management
2
3. In 2013
OA Discussion Paper
VC’s Committee
Draft Policy &
Procedures
UQ Research
Committee
UQ Academic Board
3
Complete the
circle
UQ Senate
October 24
4. Open Access for
UQ Research Outputs Policy
• Facilitate UQ compliance with the increasingly
common open-access policies of research funding
bodies, in particular the ARC and NHMRC
• Provide greater exposure and access to the (and
potentially increase the impact of) the research
output of UQ, and
• Position UQ to take a leadership role on open access
within the Go8
• PPL at 4.20.08 (Section 4.20 Research & Research
Training)
4
5. Open Access Definition
Free availability on the public internet,
permitting any users to read, download,
copy, distribute, print, search, or link to
the full texts of these articles, crawl them
for indexing, pass them as data to
software, or use them for any other
lawful purpose
1. Budapest Open Access Initiative, 2002
2. SPARC Open Access Newsletter, issue #77, Sept 2, 2004
8. Exposure
Of all the papers published in the top scientific
journals (i.e. those listed in the top citation
index ISI Web of Knowledge) 7279 science and
social science journals from 2002 through 2006
– only 40.6 percent were cited at least once in
the five years following publication.
Jacso P. Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports.
Online Information Review 2009;33(3):603-14.
8
9. Two ways to provide open access:
Gold and Green
Gold: Authors publish in OA journals that provide free, immediate access at the
time of publication to the articles via publisher web sites. Often, but not always,
they may carry author fees, known as Article Processing Charges to be paid to the
publisher to make articles Open Access. All Public Library of Science (PLOS)
journals use this model
Green: Authors publish in a journal, and then make their version of the article,
after peer review, with revisions having been made or the publisher’s peer
reviewed final draft version freely accessible online by self - archiving or
depositing the article in a repository (either institutional repository such as UQ
eSpace or disciplinary) upon acceptance for publication
9
12. ARC and NHMRC
• NHMRC Open Access policy came into effect from 1
July 2012
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/grants/policy/dissemination-research-findings
• ARC Open Access policy came into effect from 1
January 2013.
http://www.arc.gov.au/applicants/open_access.htm
– Both state they: require any publications arising from
ARC/NHMRC supported research project to be
deposited into an open access institutional
repository within a twelve month period from the
date of publication unless bound by current legal or
contractual obligations
12
13. Both policies
Prefer the Deposit of
the Accepted or
Published Version,
also Permit Linking
UQ eSpace
ASAP after acceptance
13
14. Both policies
• No restriction on where researchers choose to
publish
• Requiring deposit at acceptance time catches
researcher when they are likely to have a copy
of the manuscript for deposit
• Allow links to in disciplinary repositories e.g.
arXiv.org, PMC
• Mature development of Australian
repositories – going green
14
15. Coverage
• ARC is all publication
outputs including books
•
is journal articles only
15
16. Double Dipping
Where the article publication costs for the same
article are covered twice, once through a
subscription charge and once through an APC, the
publisher is said to be “double dipping1”
It may be possible to avoid paying APC by
publishing in a journal that allows green selfarchiving of the post-print or publisher’s version or
linking to the version
1. The UK House of Commons' Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) Committee, "Open Access: Achieving a Functional Market“ Sept 2013
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmbis/99/9902.htm
16
17. Green Open Access
• Sixty per cent of journals allow authors to
self-archive their peer reviewed work and
make it freely available on publication
http://romeo.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2011/11/24/60-of-journals-allow-immediate-archiving-of-peer-reviewedarticles-but-it-gets-much-much-better/
17
18. Going Green – avoiding double dipping
1. When selecting where to publish have a look
at the going green pie graphs, available:
<these will be posted to the OA website>
2. The amount of green indicates the publisher
will allow the accepted version to be posted
in UQ eSpace after a 12 month embargo
3. Even if you see blue – you don’t need to pay
– as we will tag the UQ eSpace record with
“doesn’t comply”
18
19. Wiley Publishing
28 (2%)
43 (3%)
1240
(95%)
Taylor & Francis
OnlineOpen: a
hybrid open
access option
Wiley Open
Access: a
program of fully
open access
journals.
790
(44%)
981
(55%)
Archive -titles
available within
12 months
Elsevier
Gold - immediate
access if APC paid
16 (1%)
Hybrid - Open
Select Option :
pay APC or
wait 12
months
Gold immediate
access via APC
Hybrid - Open
Select Option :
pay APC or
wait 18
months
Nature Publishing
Group
62 (3%)
943 (49%)
936 (48%)
Journal Specific
Embargo Periods formal inst.
Agreement - 12
months or less
Journal Specific
Embargo Periods formal inst.
Agreement - 18-48
months
Hybrid Journals
- freely
available
within 6
months
17 (17%
47 (73%
Gold Immediately
available
subject to
publication fee
20. Sage Publishing
Springer Publishing
17 (2%)
150 (8%)
Hybrid: Sage
Choice - pay
APC or wait 12
months
700
(98%)
Gold immediately
availablilty via
APC
Cambridge Uni Press
5 (3%)
152 (97%)
Gold immediatley
available on
payment of
APC
Hybrid Springer Open
Choice payment of
ACP or self
archive after
12 months
1781
(92%)
Oxford Uni Press
15 (6%)
Gold accessable
immediately
upon payment of
APC
Hybrid Cambridge
Open: payment
of APC or wait 12
months
Hybrid - Oxford
Open: pay APC or
wait the 12- 24
month embargo
255 (94%)
Gold - immediate
access upon APC
payment
21. Addendum
• General UQ Addendum
'The Author has the right to publicly archive their revised, peerreviewed personal version of their paper on their institutional website
and their personal website, provided in all cases a link to the journal
article on the Publisher website is included.'
• NHMRC Addendum
'The Author has the right to publicly archive their version of the article
(Word document) after peer-review, with revisions having been
made, on their institutional website and their personal
website, provided in all cases a link to the journal article on the
Publisher website is included.‘
Available from:
• https://www.library.uq.edu.au/open-access
21
22. Helpful links
• UQ Library Open Access Website
(includes membership details for discounts)
• NHMRC Open Access Policy: FAQ for Authors
and Repository Managers
• Australian Open Access Support Group
• UQ Library eScholarship Blog
• Six Open Access Myths
22
25. Illusion of Open
• To check the open access status of a journal it maybe
necessary to login via the UQ visitor wireless Network
• This will allow you to test access to any of the UQ
licensed content from on campus - but from a non-UQ
IP address.
• For example, if you want to test that a resource is really
open access, but are not sure if you are really gaining
access via a UQ institutional subscription.
• Details:
https://www.its.uq.edu.au//helpdesk/connecting-andusing-uq-visitor-wireless?pid=1395
25
26. What’s in eSpace?
Document type
Journal Article
Conference
Papers
Book Chapters
Theses *
Images
Books
Total records
94965
OA records
4245
36486
10127
9681
5515
5343
2608
431
550
5515
575
* 7484 theses - UQ staff and students only
Other documents types include: Research Reports, Preprints,
Working Papers, Creative Works, Designs, Audio and Videos
(Data as of end 2012)
27. Some benefits…
• Discoverability - UQ eSpace is harvested by major
search engines and discovery tools
• Page views and Download statistics recorded
• Access Scopus and WoS citation counts and
Altmetrics
• Supported and ongoing archival access to UQ
research publications and full text OA copies
30. Task
Modify eSpace to facilitate easy deposit of files
Task responsibility
UQ Library
Comments
In process
2
Determine if article is open access, available
after embargo, available on a trusted
repository (such as Pub Med Central) or post
print required
UQ Library
UQ Library staff to
check Sherpa Romeo
and other sources
3
Link to article, or download and attach PDF, or
attach post print and edit ‘OA compliance’ field
in eSpace record
UQ Library
Details of compliance
will be available in
Business Objects so
schools can use this to
check compliance
4
Contact publisher to seek permission for post
print to be archived on eSpace
UQ Library
Essential for UQ to
have an Open Access
Policy in order to
establish Agreements
with some publishers
to avoid setting
arrangements for each
publication
5
6
Request post print if required
Attach post print to eSpace record and edit ‘OA
compliance’ field in eSpace record
UQ Library
UQ Library
7
edit ‘OA compliance’ field in eSpace record if
publisher is unwilling to give permission
UQ Library
8
9
Maintain relevant statistics
Create and maintain record of publisher
agreements
UQ Library
UQ Library
1
UQ Open Access
Service –
Tasks and
Responsibilities
30
Details of compliance
will be available in
Business Objects so
schools can use this to
check compliance
Details of compliance
will be available in
Business Objects so
schools can use this to
check compliance
31. Open Access Compliance
• For records from 1st July 2013
• eSpace data staff will update as required
• Will be the basis of Business Objects reports in
the future to assist in compliance
31
32. Definitions
• Open Access – Publisher DOI = a DOI (Digital
Object Identifier) to the publisher’s web site page
for the article e.g. eSpace record | DOI
• Open Access – Publisher PDF = the final
publisher version of an article (e.g. journal
version with final pagination and formatting)
• Open Access - Post Print = It is the author’s
accepted version of the article (Word document)
after peer-review, with revisions having been
made (ARC/NHMRC definition)
32
33. Open Access Research Data
Open Data is the idea that certain data should be freely available to
everyone to use and republish as they wish, without restrictions from
copyright, patents or other mechanisms of control.
The concept of open access to scientific data was institutionally established
with the formation of the World Data Centre system in 1957-1958.
World Data Centres were established by the International Council for Science
to minimize the risk of data loss and to maximize data accessibility.
While the open-science-data movement long predates the Internet, the
availability of fast, ubiquitous networking has significantly changed the
context, since publishing and obtaining data has become much less
expensive and time-consuming.
"Open Data." Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 18 June 2012. Web 28 August 2012. available:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_data
34. The Denton Declaration, An
Open Data Manifesto
Open access to research data is critical for advancing science, scholarship, and society.
Research data, when repurposed, has an accretive value.
Publicly funded research should be publicly available for public good.
Transparency in research is essential to sustain the public trust.
The validation of research data by the peer community is an essential function of the
responsible conduct of research.
Managing research data is the responsibility of a broad community of stakeholders
including researchers, funders, institutions, libraries, archivists, and the public.
The Denton Declaration, An Open Data Manifesto, The University of North Texas. Web 23 Oct 2012. available
http://openaccess.unt.edu/denton_declaration
35. ARC and NHMRC
…Research data should
be made available for use
by other researchers
unless this is prevented
by ethical, privacy or
confidentiality matters
36. “There is
evidence that studies
that make their data
available do indeed
receive more citations
than similar studies
that do not.”
Piwowar H. and Vision
T.J 2013 "Data reuse and the open data
citation advantage“
https://peerj.com/preprints/1.pdf
9% - 30%
increase
In citations
Wed 2 October, The Australian: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/highereducation/publish-freely-for-greater-coverage/story-e6frgcjx-1226731041934
39. eSpace: Research Data Collections
Researchers can now add data sets and data collections to UQ eSpace via a dedicated
form
Once a record is submitted, researchers can edit their records
and re-submit for approval multiple times, via their My Research
Data list
Researchers can see a list of their own data set or data
collection records, linked to their author ID on their My Research
Data page
Researchers
can edit each
record and
re-submit for
approval via
‘Edit’ icon
40.
41. Future developments
• Documentation and guidance documents
• UPO update sessions
• eSpace system developments
– Information about OA journals integrated
41
An OA discussion paper was presented to VC’s Committee by UL in late March 2013 VC’s Committee endorsed concept of OA and recommended policy be drafted for Research CommitteeDraft policy prepared and submitted to 9th April meeting of Research CommitteeWorking party established to report back to Research Committee June 2013Research Committee recommended a pilot to report on procedures – this was undertaken for three months July-Sept.Research Committee meeting mid-August 2013 approved draft policy & the proceduresOn the 30 September the Academic Board unanimously approved the policy and procedures for Open Access for UQ Research Outputs which is based on linking to a freely available version of a publication either available immediately or within 12 months of publication, or self -archiving of a post-print.
The policy was developed to joint custodians on this topic (ie. both DVC (Research) and University Librarian). Evidence is available from the Australian Open Access Support Group site http://aoasg.org.au/resources/comparison-of-arc-nhmrc-policies/
Stepping back …..In its finest form – full OA permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the FT of the articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal or technical barriers…. This is taken from the Budapest OA Initiative.OA refers to the provision of unrestricted access via the Internet - The Budapest Open Access Initiative – February 14, 2002Bethesda Statement 2003Berlin Declaration 2003
While open access relies on the consent of copyright holders to share their work, making material open access will not deprive copyright holders of any rights. Copyright laws still applyCreative Commons
With acknowledgement going to the Australian Open Access Support Group http://aoasg.org.au/resources/benefits-of-open-access/ Some researchers may have access to resources behind a paywall (such as subscription access) though not know how to find themthere are disadvantages – we are seeing the wild west of publishing – as expressed in a recent Science paper A cancer drug discovered in a humble lichen, and ready for testing in patients, might sound too good to be true. That's because it is. But more than a hundred lower-tier scientific journals accepted a fake, error-ridden cancer study for publication in a spoof organized by Science magazine.The fake study points to a "Wild West" of pay-to-publish outlets feeding off lower tiers of the scientific enterprise by publishing studies without any appreciable scrutiny, say research ethics experts. (See "Who's Afraid of Peer Review?") Of 255 open-access journals that said they would review his study, 157 accepted the fake study for publication. "Acceptance was the norm, not the exception," he writes -- raises concerns for the peer review process (taken from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/10/131003-bohannon-science-spoof-open-access-peer-review-cancer/ )
are the two most common routes to providing open access NHMRC / ARC – green definition Sherpa romeo &OAKList – searching australian journals such as Medical Journal of Australia – links to these are available from: http://www.library.uq.edu.au/open-access– colours can differ e.g. they refer to PLOS as Green --- so don’t be confused!
There is increasing support worldwide for making research outputs openly accessible, to maximize their impact and benefit to society. In the United States, building on the now-mature open access policy (2007) for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Obama administration in 2013 introduced a policy requiring open access for publications and data arising from research funded by all major United States research agencies. The European Commission has an open data and open access strategy. In the UK, the Wellcome Trust and Research Councils UK have implemented similar requirements for research publications arising from research that they fund. In Australia, this trend is evidenced by the recent open-access policies, discussed earlier, implemented by two key research funding bodies, the ARC and NHMRC. More than 175 universities throughout the world have adopted open access policies. The latest adopter is The University of Queensland’s major co-publisher and the largest public research university in the world, the University of California. At a time when institutions, such as UQ, are invited to join exclusive consortium such as edX, there is a requirement for the best open access content to form the basis of learning materials for uptake by millions of people worldwide undertaking tertiary studies. “Evidence has unequivocally demonstrated that to have real effect policies must be mandatory, whether institutional or funder policies. Mandatory policies at institutions succeed in accumulating content in their repositories, averaging 60% of total output after a couple of years of the policy being in place. Evidence shows that researchers are quite happy to be mandated to act in this way” Further to this, unlocking scholarly content from open access benefits researchers, educational institutions, businesses, research funders and the public by speeding up the rate of research, discovery and development. A Naturenews article recently reported that more research is presently available than previously thought, based on findings that there is a 50% chance of finding and downloading research published in 2011 for free on the Internet. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdfSwan A. Policy guidelines for the development and promotion of open access. France: UNESCO; 2012. Available from: http://bit.ly/LXaiKK.Taken from the Preamble to the UQ OA for UQ Research Outputsembed . full size . source . license: Creative Commons (public domain) old style world globe -- maps globes technology world old globe style http://www.photoree.com/photos/permalink/9479139-Adrian%20van%20Leen
The NHMRC policy came into effect 1 July 2012, with requirement for the first articles to be made publicly available from 1 July 2013 – regardless of the grant that supported the researchThe ARC – first publications will start to appear after Jan 2014.UQ OA policy for Research Outputs mirrors the ARC & NHMRC policies
Both policies: all metadata must be deposited in IR with a link to OA version as soon as possible after acceptancePrefer the deposit of Accepted or Published version into an IRPermit the deposit into a subject repository (linking to the IR)Permit publication in an OA journal (linking to the IR)They both state that if a publisher doesn’t allow OA, the researcher must say so in the Final Report.
By delving into conditions this can sometimes be avoidedThough payment for publishing may be possible for most ARC schemes publication and dissemination of project outputs and outreach activity costs may be supported at up to two (2) per cent of total non-salary ARC funding awarded to the Project. This excludes fees for patent application and holding. The cap does not apply to the ARC Centres of Excellence scheme. NHMRC rules state: ‘Publication costs cannot be requested on an application but may be listed as a legitimate cost against DRCs as part of the financial acquittal process.’
Based on Sherpa/RoMEO statistics – for post-print or publishers PDF
Regarding no. 3:If the journal never allows the article to be made available, this information must be provided at the time of Final Report submission. Institutions may wish to use a publicly available 'holding note' to explain that copyright/licensing restrictions prevent inclusion of a particular article on the repository until a specific date.
Neither ARC or NHMRC has agreements with Wiley & Elsevier (as of March 2013), this poses compliance challenges
I just thought I would show you two addendum examples which can be used when publishers don’t permit self-archiving:The first one is the general UQ addendumThe second can be used if the work was NHMRC fundedBoth addendums can be found on the libraries open access webpage
Download stats
Depositing open access – live demo My ResearchPossibly My ResearchAdd Missing PublicationSherpa/Romeo linkShow Upload sectionFile selection – filenamingTypes – explain versions and HERDC evidenceOA release date
Helen – please can you include this slide towards or at the close of the talk
Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarlycommunications system in the UK(from the RIN study –the key results of our modelling are that: The subscriptions paid by academic libraries globally would fall by £2.91bn. But thesesavings would be offset by an increase of £2.92bn in the charges that the academic andresearch institutions of which they are a part (or their funders) would have to meet inauthor-side publication fees. The costs and benefits would be unevenly distributed across institutions: research-intensiveinstitutions would tend to pay more in publication fees than they currently do for librarysubscriptions, while institutions where research constitutes a lower proportion of activityand expenditure would tend to see reductions in overall expenditure. In the UK, libraries in the HE sector as a whole would benefit by c£128m. But the UK’scontribution to publication fees would amount to c£213m. The UK’s share of funding to meetthe costs of publication, distribution and access would rise from 5.2% to 7.0%. The main beneficiaries would be other institutions that currently purchase journalsubscriptions, but are not major producers of research outputs.