2. • Brief introduction of mind control
technologies
• Reported stories about people who claimed
that they were mind control victims
• Current data about mind control victims
• Soleilmavis’ Case summary of Mind Control
abuse and torture
3. Brief introduction of mind control
technologies
• Nazi Wonder Drug
• Mk-ultra, America’s Central Intelligence Agency
mind control project.
• Implantable electronic chip mind control
• Voice to Skull Technologies
• Mind reading technologies
• Patents of Mind Control Technologies
• More evidence to prove the existence of mind
control technologies.
4. Nazi Wonder Drug
• “Wonder drug” D-IX - cocaine-based drug, experiment in Sachsenhausen
concentration camp in 1944.
• Project Paperclip Program, authorized by President Truman in 1946, to
exploit German scientists for American research.
• 1999 report to the Senate and the House, “between 1945 and 1955, 765
German scientists, engineers, and technicians were brought to the US under
Paperclip and similar programs (Bluebird Report).”
5. Mk-ultra, America’s Central Intelligence
Agency mind control project.
• BLUEBIRD in 1950
• ARTICHOKE in 1951 with Canada and Britain included
• MKULTRA in 1953, technically was closed in 1964.
• MKSEARCH remained active well into the seventies.
• MK-Ultra “brainwashing” victims won compensation from CIA, nine
already had each received $67,000 (£33,500) compensation from
the spy agency.
6. Implantable electronic chip mind
control
• Implantable electronic chip, researched at the University of Washington (UW),
helped establish new nerve connections in the part of the brain that controlled
movement.
• Implantable devices, CIA’s use of biomedical intellectual property, that were
millimeter and sub-millimeter in size, developed at the Alfred Mann Foundation,
Second Sight LLC, Advanced Bionics, and under Naval Space Warfare (SPAWAR)
contract #N6600106C8005, under the DARPA programs of Tony Tether, Col.
Geoffrey Ling and N.I.H programs of William Heetderks, could be surreptitiously
implanted (and had been fabricated in a manner that the devices could not be
detected or localized by clinical medical or radiology techniques), and provided a
shocking amount of surveillance capability regarding a subject’s activities, which
might include visual and auditory biofeedback data.
7. Voice to Skull Technologies
• Artificial microwave voice-to-skull transmission was successfully
demonstrated by researcher Dr. Joseph Sharp in 1973, announced at a seminar at
the University of Utah in 1974, and in the journal “American Psychologist” in the
March 1975 issue, the article was titled “Microwaves and Behavior” by Dr. Don
Justesen (1975).
• In 2002, the US Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a
device: “a nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device,
which broadcast sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-
modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device, which can transmit
ultrasound (above human hearing) into the skull of mammals.” NOTE: The sound
modulation might be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of voice-
to-skull uses was an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports.
8. Mind reading technologies
• John Dylan Haynes of the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in
Germany in 2007, could look deep inside a person’s brain, and to read their intentions before
they act.
• In 2011, neuroscientists at the University of California Berkeley put electrodes inside the skulls
of brain surgery patients to monitor information from their temporal lobe, which was involved in
the processing of speech and images. As the patient listened to someone speaking, a computer
program analyzed how the brain processed and reproduced the words they had heard.
• Harvard’s Buckner won the Alzheimer’s award for reading our minds in 2011 by remotely
measuring brain activity.
• NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab, “The sensitivity of our deep-space tracking antennas located
around the world is truly amazing. The antennas must capture Voyager information from a
signal so weak that the power striking the antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts.
• Scientists believed the weak radio emission of a cubic centimeter of brain matter was within the
detectable limits of the satellite. It was technically possible for a satellite to detect your thoughts,
emotions and perceptions, and pass that information to a computer for interpretation.
9. Patents of Mind Control Technologies
• USP # 6,729,337 (May 4, 2004), “Sony Brain Waves
Manipulation By Ultrasound,” an “ultrasound array” that supposedly
stimulated your brain waves to simulate sensory experiences causing its
users to experience smells, tastes and even touch without external stimuli.
• USP # 6,488,617 (December 3, 2002), Nervous System
Manipulation by EM Fields from Monitors.
10. More evidence to prove the existence of
mind control technologies
• Microwave Irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow disclosed that since 1952, the Soviet government began
directing microwave beams at the U.S. embassy in Moscow.
• The Marine Biological Laboratory in Massachusetts carried out the research that using electrical signals to
manipulate the color of a squid’s iridescent skin over the entire color spectrum.
• General Boris Ratnikov, former KGB officer, told Rossiiskaya Gazeta that in the mid-eighties, about fifty research
institutes in the Soviet Union studied remote mind control techniques backed by substantial government funding,
but all such research efforts were halted with the demise of the Soviet empire in the early nineties.
• Japan attempted to “program” President Yeltsin’s mind, to make him give the Kuril Islands back to Japan in 1992,
Ratnikov said.
• USA embassy building in Moscow contained equipment to exert psychotronic influence on local residents in
early nineties.
• Mr. Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton raised high concerns of human rights violations
implemented with electromagnetic spectrums weapons in the article “US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human
Rights.”
• Carole Smith, a British psychoanalyst, in recent years has been openly critical of government use of intrusive
technology on non-consenting citizens, in the article “Diagnosis Psychosis in Light of Mind Invasive Technology -
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology.”
• The European Parliament A4-0005/1999 Paragraph 27 called for a worldwide ban on weapons that might enable
“any form” of the “manipulation of human beings.”
• USA Representative Dennis Kucinich and bill H.R. 2977 (2001) called to ban mind control weapons.
• The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) formally listed a special category of
psychotronic mind control and other electromagnetic resonance weapons in their 2002 Media Guide to
Disarmament.
11. Reported stories about people who claimed
that they were mind control victims
• Myron May of Tallahassee
• Jimmy Shao of Sacramento, California
• Jared Loughner
• Angela Modispaw
• Honduras’ fallen leader
• Ronald Morgan
• Michael Robert Lawrence
• Richard Scott Baumhammers
• Solomon
• Tami Stainfield
• In 2011, many mind control victims provided statements to Presidential Commission for the
Study of Bioethical Issues in Washington, DC. But they did not receive any positive reply from
the government.
12. An anonymous survey for 296 mind control
victims all over the world
4.39
21.62
29.39
23.65
14.19
5.07 1.69
Victims Ages
10-20
21-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
61-70
above 70
14. Ages when they were aware of being a
target
23.31
31.0816.55
19.93
7.09
1.69 0.34
10-20
21-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
61-70
above 70
15. The Length Of Being Forced To Accept
Psychiatric Treatment Were
22.3
4.05
1.35
3.39
5.74
3.72
50.34% of all victims havebeen forced to accept
psychiatrictreatment.All victims claimed that the
psychiatrictreatmentdid not have any therapeutic
effect.
1-3months
4-6months
7-12months
1yrs
2-3yrs
4-5yrs
16. The possible reasons victims believed they
became a target were:
• (1) Government Secret Human Experiments or Scientists Performing Secret
Human Experiments supported by Government (58.11%);
• (2) Scientists Performing Secret Human Experiment (36.82%);
• (3) Government Secret War (33.45%);
• (4) Secret Political persecution (32.77%);
• (5) Terrorist violence (22.97%);
• (6) Misuse of weapons by government corruption (45.27%).
17. The symptoms victims experienced as a possible result of
electromagnetic mind control technology
• (1) Hot and Cold Flashes 50.00% (2) Nausea 51.01% (3) Severe sweating 40.20%
• (4) Induced Sleep 65.20% (5) Sleep deprivation 78.72% (6) Extreme Fatigue 68.58%
• (7) Blurred Vision 57.43% (8) Sensations of pain in internal organs 61.82%
• (9) Sensations of pain in backbone, arms, legs, and muscles 58.78%
• (10) Numbness and tingling, Paresthesias, Loss of sensation 48.65%
• (11) Muscle Cramps /Spasms/tension 56.42% (12) Sudden Headaches 63.85%
• (13) Irregular Heartbeat 60.81% (14) False Heart Attacks 38.85% (15) Tooth Pain 50.34%
• (16) Diarrhea. 44.26% (17) Acute inflammation/autoimmunity reactions 25.34%
• (18) Autoimmune disorders like Fibromyalgia 16.89% (19) Urinary tract infections 17.91%
• (20) Skin problems and skin irritations 50.34% (21) Change in growing of hair and nails 32.09%
• (22) Female problems which eventually lead to hysterectomy 8.11%
• (23) Cancer 4.39% (24) Fevers 22.97% (25) Flulike Symptoms /Sneezing 42.57%
• (26) Dizziness or Loss of Balance 55.41% (27) Sudden loss of consciousness 30.74%
• (28) Benign or Malignant Tumors 8.11% (29) Sensation of Electric Current Running through the Body 54.39%
• (30) Induced Thoughts/ telepathic communication, messages 64.53%
• (31) Hearing “voices” (reception of auditory acoustic weapon transmissions or similar) 67.91%
• (32) Seeing "Holograms" 41.89% (33) Dream Manipulation 71.28%
• (34) Artificial Emotions (induced fear, anger, shame, joy, hate, sadness) 67.91%
• (35) Sudden “unexpected" Sexual Arousal 53.72% (36) Genital manipulation 55.07%
• (37) Induced Smells 52.03% (38) Sudden extreme moodswings (depression - euphoria) 47.97%
• (39) Induced pleasure-aversion reactions towards people or objects 44.93%
• (40) Making you say things (forced speech) 45.61% (41) General behaviour control in some situations 49.66%
• (42) Manipulation of Memory (forgetting/remembering/screen memories) 67.23%
• (43) Remote steering of eye movements 38.51% (44) Remote steering of body movements/motor control 42.57%
• (45) Virtual reality experiences while awake 35.14%
18. Soleilmavis’ Case Summary Of Mind Control
Abuse And Torture
• Toture Began: in December, 2001, when she was studying for a Master’s Degree in Australia.
• Duration of the suffering: from December 2001 to today.
• Fact and Evidence: Her brain was controlled by voice-to-skull and remote electromagnetic mind control
technologies, and she was taken into the US Embassy in Hong Kong in April 2002.
• Her work of fighting against the crime: Sponsor and Activist at Worldwide campaign against
secret mind control weapons abuse and torture since 2006. http://peacepink.ning.com
• Her Book: "Twelve Years in the Grave - Mind Control with Electromagnetic Spectrums, the Invisible Modern
Concentration Camp"
• She urges the US government to investigate her case with the fact of being taken into the US
Embassy in Hong Kong, requires the cooperation and collaboration from Australia and China governments, and
asks the support from the United Nations and other governments in investigating her case.
• She wishes the public help her to rise public awareness and urge governments to take immediate
actions to investigate her case.
19. Conclusions
• In this research, the following conclusions were reached:
• 1) Many countries have developed various types of mind control methods: drugs, microchips,
nanotechnologies and electromagnetic waves. Could these governments also introduce
legislation to regulate the use of such weapons?
• 2) Effective laws and other measures from our governments need to be enacted to prevent the
misuse of such weapons.
• 3) In the event of misuse of such weapons, government intervention is required to protect the
victims’ and prosecute torturers to the fullest extent of the law.
• It is hoped that this paper will bring about public awareness and solutions
to mind control weapons abuse and torture.
