SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 15
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Insurers’ IT projects can
threaten independent
agent loyalty. Change
management can turn
skeptics into believers.
www.pwc.com/fsi
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally
support for tech upgrades
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 1
The heart of the matter
Insurers are upgrading their technology to support more complex
products, lower operating costs, and get closer to their customers.
But they can do more harm than good when they make changes
that alienate their independent agents. We’ve identified five steps
that can help insurers engage agents early and create a
transition plan that meets agents’ needs—converting these
important stakeholders into enthusiastic advocates.
Right now, in Beaumont, Texas, there’s an
independent agent who is struggling with an
insurance service portal. The site was
launched recently with great fanfare by her
preferred carrier, one of the six she
represents. At the moment, she can’t find
the right link to enter some required
information to prepare an annuity contract
for a new client. As she turns away from her
desk in frustration, a binder from a different
insurer catches her eye. “I should see if they
can help me close this deal.”
Insurance carriers have invested heavily to
modernize their technology in recent years.
And despite upgrades to systems like billing,
claims, and policy administration, there’s
still a lot more change ahead. When
supported by strong distribution channels,
technology advances can allow firms to roll
out more specialized products, give carriers
better pricing flexibility, and lower operating
costs. Agents are eager for innovation, too.
They’re all too aware of how much time
they’ve spent in legacy systems looking for
forms, completing them, reworking
rejections, and so on.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t always work out so
well. In many technology change projects,
insurers are focused inward. They think
about how to streamline their own
operational processes, which have real room
for improvement. Project plans usually
specify some training for the agents who’ll
use them, but many carriers make the
mistake of assuming that agents will simply
do what they’re asked. In reality, any
deployment that involves changing human
behavior requires deliberate planning to
move people from grudging acceptance to
enthusiastic advocacy. Independent agents
are particularly important, because they’re
hardly employees. If anything, they’re closer
to customers, with significant influence over
what policies are sold and with which
carriers they’re placed.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 2
How does agent satisfaction impact carriers?
Carriers must keep agent satisfaction in mind. A study completed by
J.D. Power found that as agent satisfaction increases, the likelihood of
agents increasing their premium business with an insurance company
also rises.
According to Jeremy Bowler, senior director of the insurance practice at
J.D. Power, “Agents have tremendous influence over policyholders
when it comes to switching providers. In fact, 60 percent of consumers
report that they would follow their agent recommendation to switch to
a new insurance company. Clearly, agent satisfaction can have a major
impact on policy growth for an insurance company.”
Source: Andrea Wells, “Study: Agency Satisfaction Linked to Amount of Business Sent to Insurers,” Insurance
Journal, March 26, 2009, www.insurancejournal.com, accessed April 6, 2015.
And despite all the hype around direct
distribution, it’s very possible that the
independent channel will become even more
relevant in coming years. That’s because
new entrants are spurring competition in
some markets and many customers will
value the perceived neutrality of
independent agents. Also, while carriers
have had some success selling directly to
customers with relatively simple needs,
independent agents are a valuable resource
for those with more complicated situations.
For the foreseeable future, it’s our view that
companies looking for commercial or
specialty coverage will still want tailored
advice, as will high net worth individuals
with complex insurance needs. As a result,
carriers that downplay the importance of the
independent agent channel risk alienating
some very lucrative partners.
Some carriers “get it.” Leading carriers
expect resistance to change, and they plan
for it. They know that independent agents
will often be concerned about the lost
productivity that follows project rollouts.
They know that agents may be living
through a dozen carriers making technology
upgrades at the same time, with little
confidence that they’ll benefit from any of
them. And they know that these experiences
can affect agents’ willingness to trust and
work with carriers in the long term.
Leading carriers take steps to engage their
field partners early and often. By using a
structured approach to managing change,
these insurers turn potential adversaries
into allies. This requires the right attitude
and some tangible actions. To get increased
value out of technology projects involving
independent agents, we encourage carriers
to follow this five-step approach:
 Engage agents from the beginning when
defining the change.
 Communicate with agents to build
commitment.
 Design processes to ease the transition.
 Provide training that is relevant, simple,
and concise.
 Deploy and reinforce the program.
While these are not always sequential or
distinct, the successful implementation of
each step increases a program’s overall odds
of success.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 3
An in-depth discussion
In PwC’s 2015 CEO
survey, 61% of
Insurance CEOs
believe changes in
core technologies of
production or
service provision
will be disruptive to
the industry (that
includes
respondents who
listed very
disruptive or
somewhat
disruptive).
Source: PwC, PwC’s 18th Annual
Global CEO Survey, Insurance
sector data, February 2015
In today’s evolving insurance industry,
customer-facing transformation projects
have moved to the front burner. Market
demands are more complex than ever, with
new pressure from customers and agents.
And many policy administration systems are
nearing the end of their productive life,
requiring extensive maintenance and taking
away from discretionary investment. For
many carriers, the question is no longer if
they should upgrade, but when.
On the positive side, insurers can now
choose from a range of stable, feature-rich
systems, making upgrades less risky than
before. Insurance used to be paper based,
and agents spent a fair amount of time
correcting applications and claims.
Automation has helped carriers and agents
work more efficiently, reducing errors and
clerical work. And companies are turning to
technology to get more insights out of the
vast data sets that are now within their
reach. Leading insurers are developing
information strategies that will allow them
to set themselves apart from their
competition.
In the rush to upgrade, many carriers dive
deep into functional requirements
documents that focus on product features,
technical integration, and scalability. But
there are stakeholders whose interests lie far
beyond functional specs, or availability, or
compliance. And, these users—the
independent agents who sell the carriers’
products—can have a chilling effect on
technology projects if their concerns aren’t
identified and addressed.
How carriers get it wrong with
independent agents, and why it
matters
Unlike captive agents, independent agents
have choices. Loyalty, convenience, and
compensation are all important factors that
influence an agent’s decision regarding
carrier, but we believe that ease of doing
business tops the list. If agents feel that a
carrier is easy to work with, they’ll stick it
out, even though their productivity may
drop as they work through the learning
curve of a new system. On the other hand, if
they think the insurer is making their work
harder, they’re very likely to start tapering
off their business with that company and
consider promoting competitors instead.
This is where many carriers fumble, because
they downplay or misunderstand the effect
of the changes they’ve created.
Here are some common errors that insurers
make:
Depending on marketing teams to
shoulder all change efforts
Many insurers rely exclusively on their
marketing teams to support change
initiatives with their agents, which—in our
experience—undermines the effort. It’s true
that marketing has communications
expertise, owns external communications
channels, and often has close relationships
with independent agents. And while these
skills are important for spreading the word
about system changes, insurers need more
than publicity to build long-lasting
commitment to technology changes.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 4
Treating change as a simple
technology problem
Often, insurance carriers see new system
features as straightforward technology
upgrades that require little more than a
simple notification to agents. This point of
view overlooks the fact that many
independent agents work with multiple
carriers, and may be juggling multiple
changes at any one time. This perspective
also underestimates the level of training,
communication, and other change
management activities needed to effectively
implement a technology change. Figure 1
describes the impacts and challenges agents
may encounter from some common
insurance carrier technology upgrades.
Assuming that independent agents
are more like employees than
customers
Independent agents rarely respond to
directives as well as employees do. If a
technology change makes life harder for
agency staff—for example, if they need to
spend more time collecting or
understanding information—they may turn
to competitive carriers when quoting
policies.
Figure 1: Even the simplest technology upgrades can have many unintended side effects for insurance
agents. These can be mitigated, but will pose serious challenges if they are not addressed up front.
Change Impacts Challenges
New billing
system and
invoices
 Direct impact: Agents may need to
adjust to new ways to review payments,
make payments on behalf of the insured,
and/or update payment plans.
 Indirect impact: Policyholders may see
new invoices or different payment
options.
 Agents may struggle to train staff to use new
payment methods or advise policyholders on
options.
 Agents may not set aside time or attention to
explain changes to policyholders.
 Agents may feel sidelined if carriers use the
new system to communicate directly with
policyholders.
Update to
quoting
system
 Direct impact: Agents may need to use
new tools or processes to quote new
business, and may lose some
functionality at first.
 Indirect impact: Policyholders may see
different pricing or terms as a result of
product changes.
 Agents may find it easier to move business to
other carriers than train staff on new systems.
 Agents may react poorly to pricing changes.
 Agents may feel overwhelmed by product
changes and resent impact to policyholders.
Incentive
compensation
system
change
 Direct impact: Agents may need to
adjust to new system for tracking
compensation and changes to
commission plans and recognition
programs.
 Agents may be suspicious of changes to
commission schedules and view simplification
as an exercise designed to pay them less.
 Agents may overwhelm staff with requests to
validate amounts paid.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 5
Failing to understand, or expect,
resistance and concerns
Some carriers assume that their agents are a
constant distribution force that is unlikely to
leave. Other carriers may have the best of
intentions, gathering agents’ inputs early in
the process—only to let those inputs fall by
the wayside as they make tradeoffs in the
rush to upgrade. Leading carriers
understand that agents play a vital role in
their distribution strategy, and carefully
prioritize their needs alongside business and
internal user goals.
Forgetting that not everyone benefits
from change
When technology upgrades emphasize back
office efficiencies such as streamlined
processes or self-service capabilities, agents
may perceive that changes are simply
increasing their workloads. In this case,
publicizing a planned change can be
counterproductive. Most insurers don’t
consider the agent’s perspective on “What’s
in it for me?” until it’s too late.
Avoid jeopardizing the broader
project by using change
management
For the foreseeable future, independent
agents will still be an important delivery
channel for most insurance carriers; they
may even grow more relevant, as companies
turn to direct distribution for their lower-
margin products. As we’ve already noted,
poorly managed transitions usually lead to
decreased productivity. And dissatisfied
agents are more likely to sell competitors’
products.
But even the fiercely loyal independent
agent may struggle to adapt to technology
changes. A J.D. Power study found that
technology is one of the most important
drivers of agency satisfaction, ahead of both
price and compensation.1 And you shouldn’t
simply assume that agents and their staff
will be comfortable with apps and digital
processes. They’ll need help to make the
adoption work, and they may need
incentives to encourage them along the path.
The good news is that a little planning goes a
long way. And by involving agents early on in
the process—before the requirements have
been written—insurers can make sure that new
systems will work for this valuable
constituency. With the right training and tools,
agents can move from sellers to relationship
builders, and that benefits everyone.
Our approach to managing
change for independent agents
In recent years, we’ve helped a range of
insurance carriers as they’ve upgraded their
technology. Drawing on this experience, we
recommend a structured approach to
managing change with independent agents
in technology projects. Specifically, we
encourage companies to think about five key
steps in the transition:
 Engaging agents from the beginning
when defining the change.
 Communicating to build commitment.
 Designing processes to ease the transition.
 Providing training that is simple,
short, and relevant.
 Deploying the changes and reinforcing
the program.
It’s important to remember that this is not a
strict, linear process. The approach we
describe below, and the corresponding steps,
are part of an interrelated cycle. These
should be refined throughout a given
project, and some actions may need to be
taken in parallel.
………………………..…..…
1
J.D. Power, "Insurance Agents Who Are Highly Satisfied with
a Particular Insurer Drive A Majority of Their Business to That
Insurer," February 2010.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 6
Step 1: Engage agents from the
beginning when defining the
change
Don’t treat independent agents as an
afterthought when planning for technology
change. Instead, carriers should go out of
their way to engage external stakeholders
early, both before and during the change
design stages. This process starts early,
when defining the requirements. As shown
in Figure 2, we believe you should balance
needs across three areas when planning
technology upgrades: market analysis, user
needs (including both agents' and
customers'), and business priorities.
In a recent publication, Playing for Keeps:
How insurers can win customers one at a
time, we noted how little most insurers
know about their end customers, and how
fragmented operating models have led to
inconsistent customer experiences.2 In that
paper, we talked about how the very notion
of “customer-centric” has changed. We
reiterate here that focusing on the customer
means more than just designing a good user
interface. Not only do you have to actively
look for insight into customer needs, you
also need to streamline the user experience,
and rethink the operating model. These
same concepts apply to agents just as they
do customers.
Long before deployment, carriers should
think about which agents they'll talk to, how
they'll receive feedback, and how they'll
incorporate suggestions. How would your
most important agent segments want to
change the systems you're revamping? How
will your planned changes affect their
business? Could the change affect the way
they interact with their customers? Will it
require more or less of their time? We’re not
suggesting that agent requirements should
drive the project, but carriers should take
time to understand what different categories
of agents and customers want, and then
prioritize those needs and integrate them
within the broader program design.
Finally, carriers should think about how to
engage agents throughout the rollout
process. We suggest that carriers solicit
agent feedback on topics ranging from
system usability testing, to thinking through
communication plans, to defining success.
Even if decisions are made counter to agent
preferences based on sound business
rationale, understanding points of resistance
will allow you to plan for and address them
proactively
………………………..…..…
2
PwC, “Playing for keeps: How insurers can win customers,
one at a time,” July 2014, www.pwc.com/fsi.
Figure 2: Key considerations when planning technology upgrades.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 7
Know your agents
Understanding the
varying needs of
your agents can help
you tailor your
change management
techniques for each
group.
Each agency is unique, and transition
programs are not one-size-fits-all. We
recommend viewing them across several
dimensions:
 Earned premium.
 Overall book of business.
 Relationship strength.
 Adaptability to change.
After you’ve classified your agents, you’ll
be able to design approaches that are
directly relevant to them. When
mapping stakeholder needs:
 Agencies that are very important and
may struggle with change should be
supported extensively.
 Agencies that are less important, but
will adapt well to new programs,
should be kept informed during
the change.
 Agencies that offer a lot of value to
the organization and can manage
change well should have their
concerns addressed throughout
the process by their sales managers.
 Agencies that are less important and
may not adapt well to change should
be supported selectively.
Figure 3: Mapping stakeholders allows the carrier to identify the
appropriate level of support each agency requires.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 8
Step 2: Communicate with
agents to build commitment
After carriers have determined what to build
(or buy, or integrate), they should start
sharing information about the upcoming
changes. Here, small cues send big signals.
As seen in Figure 4, creating a communi-
cations plan helps agents understand what is
happening, why it is happening, what is
expected of them, and how they will be
supported during and after the change.
We encourage carriers to frame the change
in terms that independent agents will
appreciate—and ideally, in a way that they'll
find motivating. To find out what appeals to
different users, tailor and test
communications with different audiences—
not only across agent segments, but within
agencies as well. For example, a customer
service representative might see a $25 gift
card as a valuable incentive, while principals
might respond better to personal outreach to
help them understand how changes may
benefit their book of business. Agency
advisory councils and user groups can also
offer good insights into how changes will be
received.
We also encourage testing messages with
internal audiences. Front-line staff, like
underwriters and regional sales managers,
are likely to have useful information about
how well a given story will be received.
Accounts receivable, claims, and marketing
staff may also have good insights. Finally,
carriers should make sure that their
management is vocal, visible, informed, and
aligned with the communication strategy.
An agent should be able to ask a question to
anyone in the company, from the CEO to a
claims representative, and hear the same
answer. But even the best intentions break
down when messages are delivered
inconsistently. Because of this, we also
encourage the development of internal
training to make sure everyone is speaking
the same language. Another way to avoid
confusion and mixed messages is process-
related: encourage employees to try to solve
agent issues directly, whenever possible,
without handoffs.
Figure 4: A communications plan can help keep stakeholders informed of progress throughout
the lifecycle of the program.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 9
In practice: tackling the big question on price
Helping agents see
“What’s in it for me?”
can help focus
messaging, but that’s
just a start.
The next question is likely to be “How
does this affect pricing?” Sales managers
will need clear, concise talking points to
address this, even if the changes aren’t
likely to affect products or rating
algorithms.
Particularly in personal lines, where
changes are readily apparent through
comparative raters, carriers should
always be ready to address what’s
behind any price changes. We encourage
carriers to take these steps:
1. Determine the impact. Do you know
the size of potential
increases/decreases? You’ll need an
estimate at the start—and it will
drive how much leadership attention
you’ll need.
2. Determine your pricing flexibility, if
any. Will you offer credits or
transitional pricing to offset
changes?
3. Prepare key messaging and tools, if
needed, to help sales managers
discuss pricing changes with agents.
Consider including information on
how you’ll frame changes to service,
your commitment to competitive
pricing, your financial stability, and
the business you expect to win and
lose as a result.
4. Prepare sales managers for agent
discussions. Consider educating
agents about industry issues that are
driving your changes, and help them
see how policyholders will benefit if
changes in coverage are
recommended. Help sales managers
see these discussions as
opportunities to build trust and
focus agencies on the long-term
benefits to agents and policyholders.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 10
In practice: anticipating agent challenges
One national insurance company implemented a major
technology change that affected the agency quoting
process. When they encountered challenges with the
system, agents turned to underwriters and sales staff that
hadn't been adequately prepared to answer questions.
Without tools, the underwriters and sales staff became
frustrated, making skeptical comments about the
program’s long-term prospects. This damaged the
likelihood of its adoption.
This scenario could have been avoided by defining a clear
support framework that included clear guidelines for
what each employee should know and when questions
should be referred to a customer service center or a
regional sales manager. By envisioning the change from
the agent's perspective, insurers can anticipate questions
and plan accordingly.
Step 3: Design processes to
ease the transition
As much as we’ve emphasized messaging, if
carriers don't support the process changes
with organizational focus, the
communication will fall flat. This means that
carriers need to prepare front-office staff to
respond to issues, develop process changes
to support the new tools, and create metrics
and incentives to encourage adoption of new
behaviors.
Most carriers understand the need for
preparing frequently asked questions, or
FAQs, to help underwriters and customer
service representatives deal with concerns.
But no list of potential questions will ever be
exhaustive. Leading carriers establish
protocols for responding to feedback,
answering questions, and escalating
questions they can’t answer appropriately.
To support a positive agent experience,
companies will also need to make process
changes to support agents’ use of the new
tools. This can be as simple as establishing
support contacts for agents in the early
stages, so employees can refer the agent to
the right place if they can't answer
something themselves. In some cases, it may
involve role changes or more. For example,
we often see insurance executives who
assume their IT help desks will be able to
effectively handle independent agents'
questions after a technology change. But an
IT help desk that typically supports
employees, or even captive agents, may not
be equipped to support increased call
volume, let alone handle independent
agents' questions. In some cases, carriers
may need to add support roles during the
transition to the new system to provide
sufficient support.
Finally, as the saying goes, "What gets
measured gets done." If carriers want to
encourage a particular set of behaviors, from
internal staff or independent agents, they
should measure what their staff and agents
do. By evaluating their performance against
targeted metrics, carriers can find out how
well stakeholders are adapting. If they're not
adapting well, the measurement data will
provide clues as to why—and help carriers
understand how to modify incentives to get
what they want.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 11
Step 4: Provide training that is
relevant, simple, and concise
With independent agents, there’s no
guarantee that they’ll attend the carefully
crafted training or read through thoughtfully
prepared communications. Without this
information, they may not be prepared for
new processes, systems, or responsibilities.
In these cases, training designs should
require little formal training, because they
should be intuitive and supported through
“just in time” guidance like FAQs or access
to real-time chat support. If agent feedback
from earlier focus groups indicated the need
for more in-depth training, carriers should
also develop options for in-person or virtual
courses. Incentives, like continuing
education credits, can help agents prioritize
training by framing it in “What’s in it for
me?” terms. When developing the training
strategy and plans, remember that
independent agents guard their time
carefully. Every hour in a training class is an
hour not spent generating revenue, so
training should be kept relevant, simple, and
concise to make the best use of agents’ time.
Finally, people learn differently, so making
multiple options available increases the
likelihood that training materials will be
used and understood. Depending on the
nature of the changes, you may want to
supplement initial training with additional
tools, such as short modules that cover the
basics, online demos with reference
documents, question and answer sessions,
or contests. You may also choose to offer
personal visits or one-on-one training,
though this tends to be less cost-effective
and require more support from sales
managers.
Step 5: Deploy and reinforce
the program
Companies often forget that changes need to
be reinforced after the first steps are taken.
This is particularly true for insurers trying to
change independent agent behavior, because
agents have what they see as an easy
alternative: ignore the change and sell
someone else’s product. Even after agents
read briefings or attend training, a lack of
support can push them back to previous tools
or processes that may feel more comfortable.
We suggest carriers consider these steps:
1. Build (and use) feedback loops to
hear what field agents think. This starts
with thinking through the process to
identify persistent questions, issues, or
agent dissatisfaction. When you know
what people are saying, and you have
created a path to escalate this feedback to
leadership, for action, you send a critical
message to the independent agents: “We
value you and your opinion, and we’re
listening.” That, by itself, often helps
increase engagement.
2. Share success stories. Look for ways
to share stories that promote agent wins.
By collecting testimonials from
influential agents who have made the
switch, you can influence others who are
on the fence. And if the data on adoption
tells a positive story, share that
information early and often.
3. Be prepared to see the post-
adoption environment for what it
is, not what you want it to be. If
something isn’t working, acknowledge
the issues, and provide information on
how the issues are being addressed.
When you show that you’re willing to
change if necessary, you enhance the
agent experience, and you support the
development of trust. This helps get more
support for the current change, and the
one that comes next.
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 12
Making the case for change management
Communicating the
benefits as well as the
impact of disruption
is important to
gaining leadership
buy-in.
Some organizations find it hard to
articulate the benefits of a change
management program. Reasons vary:
some have a low perception of the
activities’ “soft” value, others are
overconfident in the quality of the final
product, and most have unrealistic
expectations for how stakeholders will
react.
Though soft benefits, such as greater
engagement help, are important,
decision-makers are often more swayed
by demonstrating the potential for
disruption. By using a simple impact
analysis that shows the likelihood and
potential effect of a change on each
stakeholder group, managers can show
what’s at stake.
While there is no perfect “rule of thumb”
for change management budgets, we
often see investments of 10-15% of a
technology program’s overall cost. This
can vary by a project’s size and
complexity, the maturity of a change
management function, whether captive
agents are also affected, and likelihood
of resistance. Other approaches include
making a case by activity (which entails
quantifying specific activities), or
benefits, (which involves estimating the
likelihood and cost of project delays,
reduced productivity, or lost business).
No agent left behind:
How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 13
What this means for your business
These are complicated times for the
insurance industry. Historically, the sector
has relied on independent sales agents who
have been responsible for understanding
consumer and business needs and
recommending insurance products to their
customers. But shifts in consumer
preferences, demographics, and technology
are changing this. Many insurers are now
pursuing multi-channel strategies that put
them in direct competition with the same
independent agents they rely on. As the
number and share of market for
independent agents declines, the
relationship between some carriers and
agents may become more adversarial.
At the same time, carriers are investing in
new technology to capture better data so
they can profile their customers better,
building more loyal and profitable
relationships. And independent agents want
carriers to invest in technology, processes,
and products, because this helps them
deliver quality customer service.
How changes are designed and
communicated can have far-reaching effects.
By following a structured approach for
engaging agents early and throughout the
change process, insurers can lock in the
benefits of the larger program. And, they can
help manage some of the more contentious
aspects of the agent-carrier relationship in
the process.
This is the bottom line: when change
management is handled poorly, agents are
likely to shift their business to other carriers.
By involving agents early in the change,
seeking feedback, and encouraging
collaboration, agents are far more likely to
adopt the change and see the carrier as a
true partner. For the leading carriers who
“get it,” change management is a profitable
secret weapon that strengthens the unique
relationship between carriers and their
independent agents and gives them a
competitive edge.
www.pwc.com/fsi
“No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades,” PwC, May 2015, www.pwc.com/fsi
© 2015 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership. All rights reserved. PwC US refers to the United States member firm,
and PwC may refer to either the PwC network of firms or the US member firm. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see
www.pwc.com/structure for further details. This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for
consultation with professional advisors.
For a deeper conversation, please contact:
Debra Mazloff
debra.c.mazloff@us.pwc.com
(312) 298 5360
https://www.linkedin.com/in/debramazloff
Imran Ilyas
imran.ilyas@us.pwc.com
(312) 298 6884
https://www.linkedin.com/in/imranilyaspwc
Christine Goldberg
christine.l.goldberg@us.pwc.com
(602) 364 8510
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christine-goldberg/7/29a/b45
Juneen Belknap
juneen.belknap@us.pwc.com
(407) 236 5102
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/juneen-belknap/0/8aa/54
We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Michael Wellman to
this publication.
About our Financial Services
practice
PwC’s people come together with one purpose:
to build trust in society and solve important
problems.
PwC serves multinational financial institutions
across banking and capital markets, insurance,
asset management, hedge funds, private
equity, payments, and financial technology.
As a result, PwC has the extensive experience
needed to advise on the portfolio of business
issues that affect the industry, and we apply
that knowledge to our clients’ individual
circumstances. We help address business
issues from client impact to product design,
and from go-to-market strategy to human
capital, across all dimensions of the
organization.
PwC US helps organizations and individuals
create the value they’re looking for. We’re a
member of the PwC network of firms in 157
countries with more than 195,000 people.
We’re committed to delivering quality in
assurance, tax, and advisory services.
Gain customized access to our insights by
downloading our thought leadership app:
PwC’s 365™ Advancing business thinking
every day.
Follow us on Twitter
@PwC_US_FinSrvcs
A publication of PwC’s
Financial Services Institute
Marie Carr
Principal
Cathryn Marsh
Director
Emily Dunn
Senior Manager
Kristen Grigorescu
Senior Manager

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Regulatory Environment: PwC Top Issues
Regulatory Environment: PwC Top Issues  Regulatory Environment: PwC Top Issues
Regulatory Environment: PwC Top Issues PwC
 
Fintech Insurance Report -June 2016
Fintech Insurance Report -June 2016Fintech Insurance Report -June 2016
Fintech Insurance Report -June 2016PwC
 
2017 Top Issues - Changing Business Models - January 2017
2017 Top Issues -  Changing Business Models  - January 20172017 Top Issues -  Changing Business Models  - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Changing Business Models - January 2017PwC
 
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 20172017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017PwC
 
Current Accounting and Reporting Developments Webcast Series Q4
Current Accounting and Reporting Developments Webcast Series Q4Current Accounting and Reporting Developments Webcast Series Q4
Current Accounting and Reporting Developments Webcast Series Q4PwC
 
FHA Ruling Claim Change
FHA Ruling Claim Change FHA Ruling Claim Change
FHA Ruling Claim Change PwC
 
Health Services Tax Conference Day Two
Health Services Tax Conference Day TwoHealth Services Tax Conference Day Two
Health Services Tax Conference Day TwoPwC
 
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017PwC
 
M&A: PwC Top Issues
M&A: PwC Top Issues   M&A: PwC Top Issues
M&A: PwC Top Issues PwC
 
Healthcare reform: Five trends to watch as the Affordable Care Act turns five
Healthcare reform:  Five trends to watch as the Affordable Care Act turns fiveHealthcare reform:  Five trends to watch as the Affordable Care Act turns five
Healthcare reform: Five trends to watch as the Affordable Care Act turns fivePwC
 
Pwc 2015 Technology Sector Sec Comment Letter Trends
Pwc 2015 Technology Sector Sec Comment Letter TrendsPwc 2015 Technology Sector Sec Comment Letter Trends
Pwc 2015 Technology Sector Sec Comment Letter TrendsPwC
 
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017PwC
 
18th Annual Global CEO Survey - Technology industry key findings
18th Annual Global CEO Survey - Technology industry key findings18th Annual Global CEO Survey - Technology industry key findings
18th Annual Global CEO Survey - Technology industry key findingsPwC
 
PwC 2016 CEO Survey Insurance report
PwC 2016 CEO Survey Insurance report PwC 2016 CEO Survey Insurance report
PwC 2016 CEO Survey Insurance report PwC
 
201206 Tech Decisions: Finding Profits
201206 Tech Decisions: Finding Profits201206 Tech Decisions: Finding Profits
201206 Tech Decisions: Finding ProfitsSteven Callahan
 
EY Insurance Business Pulse, 2013-2015 – exploring the top 10 risks and oppor...
EY Insurance Business Pulse, 2013-2015 – exploring the top 10 risks and oppor...EY Insurance Business Pulse, 2013-2015 – exploring the top 10 risks and oppor...
EY Insurance Business Pulse, 2013-2015 – exploring the top 10 risks and oppor...EY
 
EY Business Pulse Report - Top 10 risks and opportunities for insurance in 20...
EY Business Pulse Report - Top 10 risks and opportunities for insurance in 20...EY Business Pulse Report - Top 10 risks and opportunities for insurance in 20...
EY Business Pulse Report - Top 10 risks and opportunities for insurance in 20...ey_insurance
 
Client case studies: Where will your company find top talent? Look to the cloud
Client case studies: Where will your company find top talent? Look to the cloudClient case studies: Where will your company find top talent? Look to the cloud
Client case studies: Where will your company find top talent? Look to the cloudPwC
 
Basel III Mortgages: Australia - Key Themes and Strategic Approach
Basel III Mortgages: Australia - Key Themes and Strategic ApproachBasel III Mortgages: Australia - Key Themes and Strategic Approach
Basel III Mortgages: Australia - Key Themes and Strategic Approachaccenture
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Regulatory Environment: PwC Top Issues
Regulatory Environment: PwC Top Issues  Regulatory Environment: PwC Top Issues
Regulatory Environment: PwC Top Issues
 
Fintech Insurance Report -June 2016
Fintech Insurance Report -June 2016Fintech Insurance Report -June 2016
Fintech Insurance Report -June 2016
 
2017 Top Issues - Changing Business Models - January 2017
2017 Top Issues -  Changing Business Models  - January 20172017 Top Issues -  Changing Business Models  - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Changing Business Models - January 2017
 
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 20172017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
2017 Top Issues - Financial Reporting Modernization - January 2017
 
Current Accounting and Reporting Developments Webcast Series Q4
Current Accounting and Reporting Developments Webcast Series Q4Current Accounting and Reporting Developments Webcast Series Q4
Current Accounting and Reporting Developments Webcast Series Q4
 
FHA Ruling Claim Change
FHA Ruling Claim Change FHA Ruling Claim Change
FHA Ruling Claim Change
 
Health Services Tax Conference Day Two
Health Services Tax Conference Day TwoHealth Services Tax Conference Day Two
Health Services Tax Conference Day Two
 
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
 
M&A: PwC Top Issues
M&A: PwC Top Issues   M&A: PwC Top Issues
M&A: PwC Top Issues
 
Healthcare reform: Five trends to watch as the Affordable Care Act turns five
Healthcare reform:  Five trends to watch as the Affordable Care Act turns fiveHealthcare reform:  Five trends to watch as the Affordable Care Act turns five
Healthcare reform: Five trends to watch as the Affordable Care Act turns five
 
Pwc 2015 Technology Sector Sec Comment Letter Trends
Pwc 2015 Technology Sector Sec Comment Letter TrendsPwc 2015 Technology Sector Sec Comment Letter Trends
Pwc 2015 Technology Sector Sec Comment Letter Trends
 
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
Medical Cost Trend: Behind the Numbers 2017
 
18th Annual Global CEO Survey - Technology industry key findings
18th Annual Global CEO Survey - Technology industry key findings18th Annual Global CEO Survey - Technology industry key findings
18th Annual Global CEO Survey - Technology industry key findings
 
PwC 2016 CEO Survey Insurance report
PwC 2016 CEO Survey Insurance report PwC 2016 CEO Survey Insurance report
PwC 2016 CEO Survey Insurance report
 
201206 Tech Decisions: Finding Profits
201206 Tech Decisions: Finding Profits201206 Tech Decisions: Finding Profits
201206 Tech Decisions: Finding Profits
 
EY Insurance Business Pulse, 2013-2015 – exploring the top 10 risks and oppor...
EY Insurance Business Pulse, 2013-2015 – exploring the top 10 risks and oppor...EY Insurance Business Pulse, 2013-2015 – exploring the top 10 risks and oppor...
EY Insurance Business Pulse, 2013-2015 – exploring the top 10 risks and oppor...
 
EY Business Pulse Report - Top 10 risks and opportunities for insurance in 20...
EY Business Pulse Report - Top 10 risks and opportunities for insurance in 20...EY Business Pulse Report - Top 10 risks and opportunities for insurance in 20...
EY Business Pulse Report - Top 10 risks and opportunities for insurance in 20...
 
Client case studies: Where will your company find top talent? Look to the cloud
Client case studies: Where will your company find top talent? Look to the cloudClient case studies: Where will your company find top talent? Look to the cloud
Client case studies: Where will your company find top talent? Look to the cloud
 
Decoding the Human
Decoding the HumanDecoding the Human
Decoding the Human
 
Basel III Mortgages: Australia - Key Themes and Strategic Approach
Basel III Mortgages: Australia - Key Themes and Strategic ApproachBasel III Mortgages: Australia - Key Themes and Strategic Approach
Basel III Mortgages: Australia - Key Themes and Strategic Approach
 

Andere mochten auch

The talent to win
The talent to winThe talent to win
The talent to winPwC
 
World Economic Forum: The power of analytics for better and faster decisions ...
World Economic Forum: The power of analytics for better and faster decisions ...World Economic Forum: The power of analytics for better and faster decisions ...
World Economic Forum: The power of analytics for better and faster decisions ...PwC
 
Putting digital technology and data to work for Tech CMO's
Putting digital technology and data to work for Tech CMO'sPutting digital technology and data to work for Tech CMO's
Putting digital technology and data to work for Tech CMO'sPwC
 
PwC's Unlock data possibilities - infographic
PwC's Unlock data possibilities - infographicPwC's Unlock data possibilities - infographic
PwC's Unlock data possibilities - infographicPwC
 
PwC Insurance deals insights
PwC Insurance deals insights PwC Insurance deals insights
PwC Insurance deals insights PwC
 

Andere mochten auch (7)

The talent to win
The talent to winThe talent to win
The talent to win
 
PwC Global PPM survey - the case for doing things differently
PwC Global PPM survey - the case for doing things differentlyPwC Global PPM survey - the case for doing things differently
PwC Global PPM survey - the case for doing things differently
 
PPM Global survey (with outputs)
PPM Global survey (with outputs)PPM Global survey (with outputs)
PPM Global survey (with outputs)
 
World Economic Forum: The power of analytics for better and faster decisions ...
World Economic Forum: The power of analytics for better and faster decisions ...World Economic Forum: The power of analytics for better and faster decisions ...
World Economic Forum: The power of analytics for better and faster decisions ...
 
Putting digital technology and data to work for Tech CMO's
Putting digital technology and data to work for Tech CMO'sPutting digital technology and data to work for Tech CMO's
Putting digital technology and data to work for Tech CMO's
 
PwC's Unlock data possibilities - infographic
PwC's Unlock data possibilities - infographicPwC's Unlock data possibilities - infographic
PwC's Unlock data possibilities - infographic
 
PwC Insurance deals insights
PwC Insurance deals insights PwC Insurance deals insights
PwC Insurance deals insights
 

Ähnlich wie PwC Managing Agent Change Report

Top 5 Consumer Expectations in the Insurance Industry - Invensis
Top 5 Consumer Expectations in the Insurance Industry - InvensisTop 5 Consumer Expectations in the Insurance Industry - Invensis
Top 5 Consumer Expectations in the Insurance Industry - InvensisInvensis
 
Smarter Faster Product Innovation - Strategic Imperatives for P&C Insurers
Smarter Faster Product Innovation - Strategic Imperatives for P&C InsurersSmarter Faster Product Innovation - Strategic Imperatives for P&C Insurers
Smarter Faster Product Innovation - Strategic Imperatives for P&C InsurersAccenture Insurance
 
Rental, HOA, Insurance, Consumer Loans Markets Overview
Rental, HOA, Insurance, Consumer Loans Markets OverviewRental, HOA, Insurance, Consumer Loans Markets Overview
Rental, HOA, Insurance, Consumer Loans Markets OverviewChristopher "Dain" Hall
 
PwC: Insurance Portals - gateways to growth
PwC: Insurance Portals - gateways to growthPwC: Insurance Portals - gateways to growth
PwC: Insurance Portals - gateways to growthNauman Noor
 
Insurance-Mobile-Solutions Proposal.docx
Insurance-Mobile-Solutions Proposal.docxInsurance-Mobile-Solutions Proposal.docx
Insurance-Mobile-Solutions Proposal.docxTeniola Adegoke
 
Evolutionary strategies for p&c insurers
Evolutionary strategies for p&c insurersEvolutionary strategies for p&c insurers
Evolutionary strategies for p&c insurersSubhash Chandra
 
Future-Proofing Insurance: Deepening Insights, Reinventing Processes and Resh...
Future-Proofing Insurance: Deepening Insights, Reinventing Processes and Resh...Future-Proofing Insurance: Deepening Insights, Reinventing Processes and Resh...
Future-Proofing Insurance: Deepening Insights, Reinventing Processes and Resh...Cognizant
 
The Growth Engine: Superior Customer Experience in Insurance
The Growth Engine: Superior Customer Experience in InsuranceThe Growth Engine: Superior Customer Experience in Insurance
The Growth Engine: Superior Customer Experience in InsuranceAlex Singla
 
Widening Technology Gap
Widening Technology GapWidening Technology Gap
Widening Technology GapNicholas Free
 
Kofax Insurance
Kofax InsuranceKofax Insurance
Kofax InsuranceMainstay
 
Kofax: Next Practices in Insurance
Kofax: Next Practices in Insurance Kofax: Next Practices in Insurance
Kofax: Next Practices in Insurance Mainstay
 
Cloud Enabled Transformation In Insurance
Cloud Enabled Transformation In InsuranceCloud Enabled Transformation In Insurance
Cloud Enabled Transformation In InsuranceCapgemini
 
Kaleidoscope_Acord_Loma_2011_Edition
Kaleidoscope_Acord_Loma_2011_EditionKaleidoscope_Acord_Loma_2011_Edition
Kaleidoscope_Acord_Loma_2011_EditionAjish Gopan
 
SMA LT Claims Perspective 02-11-15 FINAL
SMA LT Claims Perspective 02-11-15 FINALSMA LT Claims Perspective 02-11-15 FINAL
SMA LT Claims Perspective 02-11-15 FINALSteven Levine
 
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...Accenture Insurance
 
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...Accenture Insurance
 
Managing claims with cicero
Managing claims with ciceroManaging claims with cicero
Managing claims with ciceroPedroVL-L39
 
Managing claims by Vesuvio Labs
Managing claims by Vesuvio LabsManaging claims by Vesuvio Labs
Managing claims by Vesuvio Labspedro caetano
 
Analytics in Insurance Value Chain
Analytics in Insurance Value ChainAnalytics in Insurance Value Chain
Analytics in Insurance Value ChainNIIT Technologies
 

Ähnlich wie PwC Managing Agent Change Report (20)

Top 5 Consumer Expectations in the Insurance Industry - Invensis
Top 5 Consumer Expectations in the Insurance Industry - InvensisTop 5 Consumer Expectations in the Insurance Industry - Invensis
Top 5 Consumer Expectations in the Insurance Industry - Invensis
 
Smarter Faster Product Innovation - Strategic Imperatives for P&C Insurers
Smarter Faster Product Innovation - Strategic Imperatives for P&C InsurersSmarter Faster Product Innovation - Strategic Imperatives for P&C Insurers
Smarter Faster Product Innovation - Strategic Imperatives for P&C Insurers
 
Rental, HOA, Insurance, Consumer Loans Markets Overview
Rental, HOA, Insurance, Consumer Loans Markets OverviewRental, HOA, Insurance, Consumer Loans Markets Overview
Rental, HOA, Insurance, Consumer Loans Markets Overview
 
PwC: Insurance Portals - gateways to growth
PwC: Insurance Portals - gateways to growthPwC: Insurance Portals - gateways to growth
PwC: Insurance Portals - gateways to growth
 
Insurance-Mobile-Solutions Proposal.docx
Insurance-Mobile-Solutions Proposal.docxInsurance-Mobile-Solutions Proposal.docx
Insurance-Mobile-Solutions Proposal.docx
 
Evolutionary strategies for p&c insurers
Evolutionary strategies for p&c insurersEvolutionary strategies for p&c insurers
Evolutionary strategies for p&c insurers
 
Future-Proofing Insurance: Deepening Insights, Reinventing Processes and Resh...
Future-Proofing Insurance: Deepening Insights, Reinventing Processes and Resh...Future-Proofing Insurance: Deepening Insights, Reinventing Processes and Resh...
Future-Proofing Insurance: Deepening Insights, Reinventing Processes and Resh...
 
The Growth Engine: Superior Customer Experience in Insurance
The Growth Engine: Superior Customer Experience in InsuranceThe Growth Engine: Superior Customer Experience in Insurance
The Growth Engine: Superior Customer Experience in Insurance
 
Widening Technology Gap
Widening Technology GapWidening Technology Gap
Widening Technology Gap
 
Kofax Insurance
Kofax InsuranceKofax Insurance
Kofax Insurance
 
Kofax: Next Practices in Insurance
Kofax: Next Practices in Insurance Kofax: Next Practices in Insurance
Kofax: Next Practices in Insurance
 
Cloud Enabled Transformation In Insurance
Cloud Enabled Transformation In InsuranceCloud Enabled Transformation In Insurance
Cloud Enabled Transformation In Insurance
 
Kaleidoscope_Acord_Loma_2011_Edition
Kaleidoscope_Acord_Loma_2011_EditionKaleidoscope_Acord_Loma_2011_Edition
Kaleidoscope_Acord_Loma_2011_Edition
 
SMA LT Claims Perspective 02-11-15 FINAL
SMA LT Claims Perspective 02-11-15 FINALSMA LT Claims Perspective 02-11-15 FINAL
SMA LT Claims Perspective 02-11-15 FINAL
 
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
 
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
Harnessing the data exhaust stream: Changing the way the insurance game is pl...
 
Digital Insurance
Digital InsuranceDigital Insurance
Digital Insurance
 
Managing claims with cicero
Managing claims with ciceroManaging claims with cicero
Managing claims with cicero
 
Managing claims by Vesuvio Labs
Managing claims by Vesuvio LabsManaging claims by Vesuvio Labs
Managing claims by Vesuvio Labs
 
Analytics in Insurance Value Chain
Analytics in Insurance Value ChainAnalytics in Insurance Value Chain
Analytics in Insurance Value Chain
 

Mehr von PwC

2017 Top Issues Core Transformation - January 2017
2017 Top Issues Core Transformation - January 20172017 Top Issues Core Transformation - January 2017
2017 Top Issues Core Transformation - January 2017PwC
 
Chain Reaction: How Blockchain Technology Might Transform Wholesale Insurance
Chain Reaction: How Blockchain Technology Might Transform Wholesale InsuranceChain Reaction: How Blockchain Technology Might Transform Wholesale Insurance
Chain Reaction: How Blockchain Technology Might Transform Wholesale InsurancePwC
 
In depth: New financial instruments impairment model
In depth: New financial instruments impairment modelIn depth: New financial instruments impairment model
In depth: New financial instruments impairment modelPwC
 
Advancing internal audit analytics
Advancing internal audit analytics Advancing internal audit analytics
Advancing internal audit analytics PwC
 
Apache Hadoop Summit 2016: The Future of Apache Hadoop an Enterprise Architec...
Apache Hadoop Summit 2016: The Future of Apache Hadoop an Enterprise Architec...Apache Hadoop Summit 2016: The Future of Apache Hadoop an Enterprise Architec...
Apache Hadoop Summit 2016: The Future of Apache Hadoop an Enterprise Architec...PwC
 
PwC Loyalty Programs - Revenue Recognition
PwC Loyalty Programs - Revenue RecognitionPwC Loyalty Programs - Revenue Recognition
PwC Loyalty Programs - Revenue RecognitionPwC
 
In depth: The leasing standard
In depth: The leasing standardIn depth: The leasing standard
In depth: The leasing standardPwC
 
PwC Lease Accounting Guide
PwC Lease Accounting GuidePwC Lease Accounting Guide
PwC Lease Accounting GuidePwC
 
InsurTech: PwC Top Issues
InsurTech: PwC Top IssuesInsurTech: PwC Top Issues
InsurTech: PwC Top IssuesPwC
 
Artificial intelligence: PwC Top Issues
Artificial intelligence: PwC Top IssuesArtificial intelligence: PwC Top Issues
Artificial intelligence: PwC Top IssuesPwC
 
Aging Workforce: PwC Top Issues
Aging Workforce: PwC Top Issues Aging Workforce: PwC Top Issues
Aging Workforce: PwC Top Issues PwC
 
Tax: PwC Top Issues
Tax:  PwC Top Issues Tax:  PwC Top Issues
Tax: PwC Top Issues PwC
 

Mehr von PwC (12)

2017 Top Issues Core Transformation - January 2017
2017 Top Issues Core Transformation - January 20172017 Top Issues Core Transformation - January 2017
2017 Top Issues Core Transformation - January 2017
 
Chain Reaction: How Blockchain Technology Might Transform Wholesale Insurance
Chain Reaction: How Blockchain Technology Might Transform Wholesale InsuranceChain Reaction: How Blockchain Technology Might Transform Wholesale Insurance
Chain Reaction: How Blockchain Technology Might Transform Wholesale Insurance
 
In depth: New financial instruments impairment model
In depth: New financial instruments impairment modelIn depth: New financial instruments impairment model
In depth: New financial instruments impairment model
 
Advancing internal audit analytics
Advancing internal audit analytics Advancing internal audit analytics
Advancing internal audit analytics
 
Apache Hadoop Summit 2016: The Future of Apache Hadoop an Enterprise Architec...
Apache Hadoop Summit 2016: The Future of Apache Hadoop an Enterprise Architec...Apache Hadoop Summit 2016: The Future of Apache Hadoop an Enterprise Architec...
Apache Hadoop Summit 2016: The Future of Apache Hadoop an Enterprise Architec...
 
PwC Loyalty Programs - Revenue Recognition
PwC Loyalty Programs - Revenue RecognitionPwC Loyalty Programs - Revenue Recognition
PwC Loyalty Programs - Revenue Recognition
 
In depth: The leasing standard
In depth: The leasing standardIn depth: The leasing standard
In depth: The leasing standard
 
PwC Lease Accounting Guide
PwC Lease Accounting GuidePwC Lease Accounting Guide
PwC Lease Accounting Guide
 
InsurTech: PwC Top Issues
InsurTech: PwC Top IssuesInsurTech: PwC Top Issues
InsurTech: PwC Top Issues
 
Artificial intelligence: PwC Top Issues
Artificial intelligence: PwC Top IssuesArtificial intelligence: PwC Top Issues
Artificial intelligence: PwC Top Issues
 
Aging Workforce: PwC Top Issues
Aging Workforce: PwC Top Issues Aging Workforce: PwC Top Issues
Aging Workforce: PwC Top Issues
 
Tax: PwC Top Issues
Tax:  PwC Top Issues Tax:  PwC Top Issues
Tax: PwC Top Issues
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdfLundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdfAdnet Communications
 
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdfStock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdfMichael Silva
 
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal. .pptx
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal.    .pptx20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal.    .pptx
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal. .pptxFinTech Belgium
 
ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS.II BRANCH ACCOUNTS NOTES
ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS.II BRANCH ACCOUNTS NOTESACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS.II BRANCH ACCOUNTS NOTES
ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS.II BRANCH ACCOUNTS NOTESKumarJayaraman3
 
Solution manual for Intermediate Accounting, 11th Edition by David Spiceland...
Solution manual for  Intermediate Accounting, 11th Edition by David Spiceland...Solution manual for  Intermediate Accounting, 11th Edition by David Spiceland...
Solution manual for Intermediate Accounting, 11th Edition by David Spiceland...mwangimwangi222
 
20240314 Calibre March 2024 Investor Presentation (FINAL).pdf
20240314 Calibre March 2024 Investor Presentation (FINAL).pdf20240314 Calibre March 2024 Investor Presentation (FINAL).pdf
20240314 Calibre March 2024 Investor Presentation (FINAL).pdfAdnet Communications
 
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an EntrepreneurIntroduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneurabcisahunter
 
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]Commonwealth
 
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.Arifa Saeed
 
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
2024.03 Strategic Resources PresentationAdnet Communications
 
What Key Factors Should Risk Officers Consider When Using Generative AI
What Key Factors Should Risk Officers Consider When Using Generative AIWhat Key Factors Should Risk Officers Consider When Using Generative AI
What Key Factors Should Risk Officers Consider When Using Generative AI360factors
 
Hungarys economy made by Robert Miklos
Hungarys economy   made by Robert MiklosHungarys economy   made by Robert Miklos
Hungarys economy made by Robert Miklosbeduinpower135
 
RWA Report 2024: Rise of Real-World Assets in Crypto | CoinGecko
RWA Report 2024: Rise of Real-World Assets in Crypto | CoinGeckoRWA Report 2024: Rise of Real-World Assets in Crypto | CoinGecko
RWA Report 2024: Rise of Real-World Assets in Crypto | CoinGeckoCoinGecko
 
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023SkillCircle
 
The Power Laws of Bitcoin: How can an S-curve be a power law?
The Power Laws of Bitcoin: How can an S-curve be a power law?The Power Laws of Bitcoin: How can an S-curve be a power law?
The Power Laws of Bitcoin: How can an S-curve be a power law?Stephen Perrenod
 
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...Matthews Bantsijang
 
Contracts with Interdependent Preferences
Contracts with Interdependent PreferencesContracts with Interdependent Preferences
Contracts with Interdependent PreferencesGRAPE
 
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB fundingWork and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB fundingHenry Tapper
 
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdfStock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdfMichael Silva
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdfLundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
Lundin Gold March 2024 Corporate Presentation - PDAC v1.pdf
 
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdfStock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for 3/22/2024.pdf
 
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal. .pptx
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal.    .pptx20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal.    .pptx
20240315 _E-Invoicing Digiteal. .pptx
 
ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS.II BRANCH ACCOUNTS NOTES
ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS.II BRANCH ACCOUNTS NOTESACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS.II BRANCH ACCOUNTS NOTES
ACCOUNTING FOR BUSINESS.II BRANCH ACCOUNTS NOTES
 
Solution manual for Intermediate Accounting, 11th Edition by David Spiceland...
Solution manual for  Intermediate Accounting, 11th Edition by David Spiceland...Solution manual for  Intermediate Accounting, 11th Edition by David Spiceland...
Solution manual for Intermediate Accounting, 11th Edition by David Spiceland...
 
20240314 Calibre March 2024 Investor Presentation (FINAL).pdf
20240314 Calibre March 2024 Investor Presentation (FINAL).pdf20240314 Calibre March 2024 Investor Presentation (FINAL).pdf
20240314 Calibre March 2024 Investor Presentation (FINAL).pdf
 
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an EntrepreneurIntroduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Characteristics of an Entrepreneur
 
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
Monthly Market Risk Update: March 2024 [SlideShare]
 
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
MARKET FAILURE SITUATION IN THE ECONOMY.
 
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
2024.03 Strategic Resources Presentation
 
What Key Factors Should Risk Officers Consider When Using Generative AI
What Key Factors Should Risk Officers Consider When Using Generative AIWhat Key Factors Should Risk Officers Consider When Using Generative AI
What Key Factors Should Risk Officers Consider When Using Generative AI
 
Hungarys economy made by Robert Miklos
Hungarys economy   made by Robert MiklosHungarys economy   made by Robert Miklos
Hungarys economy made by Robert Miklos
 
New Monthly Enterprises Survey. Issue 21. (01.2024) Ukrainian Business in War...
New Monthly Enterprises Survey. Issue 21. (01.2024) Ukrainian Business in War...New Monthly Enterprises Survey. Issue 21. (01.2024) Ukrainian Business in War...
New Monthly Enterprises Survey. Issue 21. (01.2024) Ukrainian Business in War...
 
RWA Report 2024: Rise of Real-World Assets in Crypto | CoinGecko
RWA Report 2024: Rise of Real-World Assets in Crypto | CoinGeckoRWA Report 2024: Rise of Real-World Assets in Crypto | CoinGecko
RWA Report 2024: Rise of Real-World Assets in Crypto | CoinGecko
 
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
India Economic Survey Complete for the year of 2022 to 2023
 
The Power Laws of Bitcoin: How can an S-curve be a power law?
The Power Laws of Bitcoin: How can an S-curve be a power law?The Power Laws of Bitcoin: How can an S-curve be a power law?
The Power Laws of Bitcoin: How can an S-curve be a power law?
 
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
Remembering my Totem _Unity is Strength_ growing in Bophuthatswana_Matthews B...
 
Contracts with Interdependent Preferences
Contracts with Interdependent PreferencesContracts with Interdependent Preferences
Contracts with Interdependent Preferences
 
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB fundingWork and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
Work and Pensions report into UK corporate DB funding
 
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdfStock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
Stock Market Brief Deck for March 26.pdf
 

PwC Managing Agent Change Report

  • 1. Insurers’ IT projects can threaten independent agent loyalty. Change management can turn skeptics into believers. www.pwc.com/fsi No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades
  • 2. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 1 The heart of the matter Insurers are upgrading their technology to support more complex products, lower operating costs, and get closer to their customers. But they can do more harm than good when they make changes that alienate their independent agents. We’ve identified five steps that can help insurers engage agents early and create a transition plan that meets agents’ needs—converting these important stakeholders into enthusiastic advocates. Right now, in Beaumont, Texas, there’s an independent agent who is struggling with an insurance service portal. The site was launched recently with great fanfare by her preferred carrier, one of the six she represents. At the moment, she can’t find the right link to enter some required information to prepare an annuity contract for a new client. As she turns away from her desk in frustration, a binder from a different insurer catches her eye. “I should see if they can help me close this deal.” Insurance carriers have invested heavily to modernize their technology in recent years. And despite upgrades to systems like billing, claims, and policy administration, there’s still a lot more change ahead. When supported by strong distribution channels, technology advances can allow firms to roll out more specialized products, give carriers better pricing flexibility, and lower operating costs. Agents are eager for innovation, too. They’re all too aware of how much time they’ve spent in legacy systems looking for forms, completing them, reworking rejections, and so on. Unfortunately, it doesn’t always work out so well. In many technology change projects, insurers are focused inward. They think about how to streamline their own operational processes, which have real room for improvement. Project plans usually specify some training for the agents who’ll use them, but many carriers make the mistake of assuming that agents will simply do what they’re asked. In reality, any deployment that involves changing human behavior requires deliberate planning to move people from grudging acceptance to enthusiastic advocacy. Independent agents are particularly important, because they’re hardly employees. If anything, they’re closer to customers, with significant influence over what policies are sold and with which carriers they’re placed.
  • 3. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 2 How does agent satisfaction impact carriers? Carriers must keep agent satisfaction in mind. A study completed by J.D. Power found that as agent satisfaction increases, the likelihood of agents increasing their premium business with an insurance company also rises. According to Jeremy Bowler, senior director of the insurance practice at J.D. Power, “Agents have tremendous influence over policyholders when it comes to switching providers. In fact, 60 percent of consumers report that they would follow their agent recommendation to switch to a new insurance company. Clearly, agent satisfaction can have a major impact on policy growth for an insurance company.” Source: Andrea Wells, “Study: Agency Satisfaction Linked to Amount of Business Sent to Insurers,” Insurance Journal, March 26, 2009, www.insurancejournal.com, accessed April 6, 2015. And despite all the hype around direct distribution, it’s very possible that the independent channel will become even more relevant in coming years. That’s because new entrants are spurring competition in some markets and many customers will value the perceived neutrality of independent agents. Also, while carriers have had some success selling directly to customers with relatively simple needs, independent agents are a valuable resource for those with more complicated situations. For the foreseeable future, it’s our view that companies looking for commercial or specialty coverage will still want tailored advice, as will high net worth individuals with complex insurance needs. As a result, carriers that downplay the importance of the independent agent channel risk alienating some very lucrative partners. Some carriers “get it.” Leading carriers expect resistance to change, and they plan for it. They know that independent agents will often be concerned about the lost productivity that follows project rollouts. They know that agents may be living through a dozen carriers making technology upgrades at the same time, with little confidence that they’ll benefit from any of them. And they know that these experiences can affect agents’ willingness to trust and work with carriers in the long term. Leading carriers take steps to engage their field partners early and often. By using a structured approach to managing change, these insurers turn potential adversaries into allies. This requires the right attitude and some tangible actions. To get increased value out of technology projects involving independent agents, we encourage carriers to follow this five-step approach:  Engage agents from the beginning when defining the change.  Communicate with agents to build commitment.  Design processes to ease the transition.  Provide training that is relevant, simple, and concise.  Deploy and reinforce the program. While these are not always sequential or distinct, the successful implementation of each step increases a program’s overall odds of success.
  • 4. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 3 An in-depth discussion In PwC’s 2015 CEO survey, 61% of Insurance CEOs believe changes in core technologies of production or service provision will be disruptive to the industry (that includes respondents who listed very disruptive or somewhat disruptive). Source: PwC, PwC’s 18th Annual Global CEO Survey, Insurance sector data, February 2015 In today’s evolving insurance industry, customer-facing transformation projects have moved to the front burner. Market demands are more complex than ever, with new pressure from customers and agents. And many policy administration systems are nearing the end of their productive life, requiring extensive maintenance and taking away from discretionary investment. For many carriers, the question is no longer if they should upgrade, but when. On the positive side, insurers can now choose from a range of stable, feature-rich systems, making upgrades less risky than before. Insurance used to be paper based, and agents spent a fair amount of time correcting applications and claims. Automation has helped carriers and agents work more efficiently, reducing errors and clerical work. And companies are turning to technology to get more insights out of the vast data sets that are now within their reach. Leading insurers are developing information strategies that will allow them to set themselves apart from their competition. In the rush to upgrade, many carriers dive deep into functional requirements documents that focus on product features, technical integration, and scalability. But there are stakeholders whose interests lie far beyond functional specs, or availability, or compliance. And, these users—the independent agents who sell the carriers’ products—can have a chilling effect on technology projects if their concerns aren’t identified and addressed. How carriers get it wrong with independent agents, and why it matters Unlike captive agents, independent agents have choices. Loyalty, convenience, and compensation are all important factors that influence an agent’s decision regarding carrier, but we believe that ease of doing business tops the list. If agents feel that a carrier is easy to work with, they’ll stick it out, even though their productivity may drop as they work through the learning curve of a new system. On the other hand, if they think the insurer is making their work harder, they’re very likely to start tapering off their business with that company and consider promoting competitors instead. This is where many carriers fumble, because they downplay or misunderstand the effect of the changes they’ve created. Here are some common errors that insurers make: Depending on marketing teams to shoulder all change efforts Many insurers rely exclusively on their marketing teams to support change initiatives with their agents, which—in our experience—undermines the effort. It’s true that marketing has communications expertise, owns external communications channels, and often has close relationships with independent agents. And while these skills are important for spreading the word about system changes, insurers need more than publicity to build long-lasting commitment to technology changes.
  • 5. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 4 Treating change as a simple technology problem Often, insurance carriers see new system features as straightforward technology upgrades that require little more than a simple notification to agents. This point of view overlooks the fact that many independent agents work with multiple carriers, and may be juggling multiple changes at any one time. This perspective also underestimates the level of training, communication, and other change management activities needed to effectively implement a technology change. Figure 1 describes the impacts and challenges agents may encounter from some common insurance carrier technology upgrades. Assuming that independent agents are more like employees than customers Independent agents rarely respond to directives as well as employees do. If a technology change makes life harder for agency staff—for example, if they need to spend more time collecting or understanding information—they may turn to competitive carriers when quoting policies. Figure 1: Even the simplest technology upgrades can have many unintended side effects for insurance agents. These can be mitigated, but will pose serious challenges if they are not addressed up front. Change Impacts Challenges New billing system and invoices  Direct impact: Agents may need to adjust to new ways to review payments, make payments on behalf of the insured, and/or update payment plans.  Indirect impact: Policyholders may see new invoices or different payment options.  Agents may struggle to train staff to use new payment methods or advise policyholders on options.  Agents may not set aside time or attention to explain changes to policyholders.  Agents may feel sidelined if carriers use the new system to communicate directly with policyholders. Update to quoting system  Direct impact: Agents may need to use new tools or processes to quote new business, and may lose some functionality at first.  Indirect impact: Policyholders may see different pricing or terms as a result of product changes.  Agents may find it easier to move business to other carriers than train staff on new systems.  Agents may react poorly to pricing changes.  Agents may feel overwhelmed by product changes and resent impact to policyholders. Incentive compensation system change  Direct impact: Agents may need to adjust to new system for tracking compensation and changes to commission plans and recognition programs.  Agents may be suspicious of changes to commission schedules and view simplification as an exercise designed to pay them less.  Agents may overwhelm staff with requests to validate amounts paid.
  • 6. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 5 Failing to understand, or expect, resistance and concerns Some carriers assume that their agents are a constant distribution force that is unlikely to leave. Other carriers may have the best of intentions, gathering agents’ inputs early in the process—only to let those inputs fall by the wayside as they make tradeoffs in the rush to upgrade. Leading carriers understand that agents play a vital role in their distribution strategy, and carefully prioritize their needs alongside business and internal user goals. Forgetting that not everyone benefits from change When technology upgrades emphasize back office efficiencies such as streamlined processes or self-service capabilities, agents may perceive that changes are simply increasing their workloads. In this case, publicizing a planned change can be counterproductive. Most insurers don’t consider the agent’s perspective on “What’s in it for me?” until it’s too late. Avoid jeopardizing the broader project by using change management For the foreseeable future, independent agents will still be an important delivery channel for most insurance carriers; they may even grow more relevant, as companies turn to direct distribution for their lower- margin products. As we’ve already noted, poorly managed transitions usually lead to decreased productivity. And dissatisfied agents are more likely to sell competitors’ products. But even the fiercely loyal independent agent may struggle to adapt to technology changes. A J.D. Power study found that technology is one of the most important drivers of agency satisfaction, ahead of both price and compensation.1 And you shouldn’t simply assume that agents and their staff will be comfortable with apps and digital processes. They’ll need help to make the adoption work, and they may need incentives to encourage them along the path. The good news is that a little planning goes a long way. And by involving agents early on in the process—before the requirements have been written—insurers can make sure that new systems will work for this valuable constituency. With the right training and tools, agents can move from sellers to relationship builders, and that benefits everyone. Our approach to managing change for independent agents In recent years, we’ve helped a range of insurance carriers as they’ve upgraded their technology. Drawing on this experience, we recommend a structured approach to managing change with independent agents in technology projects. Specifically, we encourage companies to think about five key steps in the transition:  Engaging agents from the beginning when defining the change.  Communicating to build commitment.  Designing processes to ease the transition.  Providing training that is simple, short, and relevant.  Deploying the changes and reinforcing the program. It’s important to remember that this is not a strict, linear process. The approach we describe below, and the corresponding steps, are part of an interrelated cycle. These should be refined throughout a given project, and some actions may need to be taken in parallel. ………………………..…..… 1 J.D. Power, "Insurance Agents Who Are Highly Satisfied with a Particular Insurer Drive A Majority of Their Business to That Insurer," February 2010.
  • 7. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 6 Step 1: Engage agents from the beginning when defining the change Don’t treat independent agents as an afterthought when planning for technology change. Instead, carriers should go out of their way to engage external stakeholders early, both before and during the change design stages. This process starts early, when defining the requirements. As shown in Figure 2, we believe you should balance needs across three areas when planning technology upgrades: market analysis, user needs (including both agents' and customers'), and business priorities. In a recent publication, Playing for Keeps: How insurers can win customers one at a time, we noted how little most insurers know about their end customers, and how fragmented operating models have led to inconsistent customer experiences.2 In that paper, we talked about how the very notion of “customer-centric” has changed. We reiterate here that focusing on the customer means more than just designing a good user interface. Not only do you have to actively look for insight into customer needs, you also need to streamline the user experience, and rethink the operating model. These same concepts apply to agents just as they do customers. Long before deployment, carriers should think about which agents they'll talk to, how they'll receive feedback, and how they'll incorporate suggestions. How would your most important agent segments want to change the systems you're revamping? How will your planned changes affect their business? Could the change affect the way they interact with their customers? Will it require more or less of their time? We’re not suggesting that agent requirements should drive the project, but carriers should take time to understand what different categories of agents and customers want, and then prioritize those needs and integrate them within the broader program design. Finally, carriers should think about how to engage agents throughout the rollout process. We suggest that carriers solicit agent feedback on topics ranging from system usability testing, to thinking through communication plans, to defining success. Even if decisions are made counter to agent preferences based on sound business rationale, understanding points of resistance will allow you to plan for and address them proactively ………………………..…..… 2 PwC, “Playing for keeps: How insurers can win customers, one at a time,” July 2014, www.pwc.com/fsi. Figure 2: Key considerations when planning technology upgrades.
  • 8. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 7 Know your agents Understanding the varying needs of your agents can help you tailor your change management techniques for each group. Each agency is unique, and transition programs are not one-size-fits-all. We recommend viewing them across several dimensions:  Earned premium.  Overall book of business.  Relationship strength.  Adaptability to change. After you’ve classified your agents, you’ll be able to design approaches that are directly relevant to them. When mapping stakeholder needs:  Agencies that are very important and may struggle with change should be supported extensively.  Agencies that are less important, but will adapt well to new programs, should be kept informed during the change.  Agencies that offer a lot of value to the organization and can manage change well should have their concerns addressed throughout the process by their sales managers.  Agencies that are less important and may not adapt well to change should be supported selectively. Figure 3: Mapping stakeholders allows the carrier to identify the appropriate level of support each agency requires.
  • 9. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 8 Step 2: Communicate with agents to build commitment After carriers have determined what to build (or buy, or integrate), they should start sharing information about the upcoming changes. Here, small cues send big signals. As seen in Figure 4, creating a communi- cations plan helps agents understand what is happening, why it is happening, what is expected of them, and how they will be supported during and after the change. We encourage carriers to frame the change in terms that independent agents will appreciate—and ideally, in a way that they'll find motivating. To find out what appeals to different users, tailor and test communications with different audiences— not only across agent segments, but within agencies as well. For example, a customer service representative might see a $25 gift card as a valuable incentive, while principals might respond better to personal outreach to help them understand how changes may benefit their book of business. Agency advisory councils and user groups can also offer good insights into how changes will be received. We also encourage testing messages with internal audiences. Front-line staff, like underwriters and regional sales managers, are likely to have useful information about how well a given story will be received. Accounts receivable, claims, and marketing staff may also have good insights. Finally, carriers should make sure that their management is vocal, visible, informed, and aligned with the communication strategy. An agent should be able to ask a question to anyone in the company, from the CEO to a claims representative, and hear the same answer. But even the best intentions break down when messages are delivered inconsistently. Because of this, we also encourage the development of internal training to make sure everyone is speaking the same language. Another way to avoid confusion and mixed messages is process- related: encourage employees to try to solve agent issues directly, whenever possible, without handoffs. Figure 4: A communications plan can help keep stakeholders informed of progress throughout the lifecycle of the program.
  • 10. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 9 In practice: tackling the big question on price Helping agents see “What’s in it for me?” can help focus messaging, but that’s just a start. The next question is likely to be “How does this affect pricing?” Sales managers will need clear, concise talking points to address this, even if the changes aren’t likely to affect products or rating algorithms. Particularly in personal lines, where changes are readily apparent through comparative raters, carriers should always be ready to address what’s behind any price changes. We encourage carriers to take these steps: 1. Determine the impact. Do you know the size of potential increases/decreases? You’ll need an estimate at the start—and it will drive how much leadership attention you’ll need. 2. Determine your pricing flexibility, if any. Will you offer credits or transitional pricing to offset changes? 3. Prepare key messaging and tools, if needed, to help sales managers discuss pricing changes with agents. Consider including information on how you’ll frame changes to service, your commitment to competitive pricing, your financial stability, and the business you expect to win and lose as a result. 4. Prepare sales managers for agent discussions. Consider educating agents about industry issues that are driving your changes, and help them see how policyholders will benefit if changes in coverage are recommended. Help sales managers see these discussions as opportunities to build trust and focus agencies on the long-term benefits to agents and policyholders.
  • 11. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 10 In practice: anticipating agent challenges One national insurance company implemented a major technology change that affected the agency quoting process. When they encountered challenges with the system, agents turned to underwriters and sales staff that hadn't been adequately prepared to answer questions. Without tools, the underwriters and sales staff became frustrated, making skeptical comments about the program’s long-term prospects. This damaged the likelihood of its adoption. This scenario could have been avoided by defining a clear support framework that included clear guidelines for what each employee should know and when questions should be referred to a customer service center or a regional sales manager. By envisioning the change from the agent's perspective, insurers can anticipate questions and plan accordingly. Step 3: Design processes to ease the transition As much as we’ve emphasized messaging, if carriers don't support the process changes with organizational focus, the communication will fall flat. This means that carriers need to prepare front-office staff to respond to issues, develop process changes to support the new tools, and create metrics and incentives to encourage adoption of new behaviors. Most carriers understand the need for preparing frequently asked questions, or FAQs, to help underwriters and customer service representatives deal with concerns. But no list of potential questions will ever be exhaustive. Leading carriers establish protocols for responding to feedback, answering questions, and escalating questions they can’t answer appropriately. To support a positive agent experience, companies will also need to make process changes to support agents’ use of the new tools. This can be as simple as establishing support contacts for agents in the early stages, so employees can refer the agent to the right place if they can't answer something themselves. In some cases, it may involve role changes or more. For example, we often see insurance executives who assume their IT help desks will be able to effectively handle independent agents' questions after a technology change. But an IT help desk that typically supports employees, or even captive agents, may not be equipped to support increased call volume, let alone handle independent agents' questions. In some cases, carriers may need to add support roles during the transition to the new system to provide sufficient support. Finally, as the saying goes, "What gets measured gets done." If carriers want to encourage a particular set of behaviors, from internal staff or independent agents, they should measure what their staff and agents do. By evaluating their performance against targeted metrics, carriers can find out how well stakeholders are adapting. If they're not adapting well, the measurement data will provide clues as to why—and help carriers understand how to modify incentives to get what they want.
  • 12. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 11 Step 4: Provide training that is relevant, simple, and concise With independent agents, there’s no guarantee that they’ll attend the carefully crafted training or read through thoughtfully prepared communications. Without this information, they may not be prepared for new processes, systems, or responsibilities. In these cases, training designs should require little formal training, because they should be intuitive and supported through “just in time” guidance like FAQs or access to real-time chat support. If agent feedback from earlier focus groups indicated the need for more in-depth training, carriers should also develop options for in-person or virtual courses. Incentives, like continuing education credits, can help agents prioritize training by framing it in “What’s in it for me?” terms. When developing the training strategy and plans, remember that independent agents guard their time carefully. Every hour in a training class is an hour not spent generating revenue, so training should be kept relevant, simple, and concise to make the best use of agents’ time. Finally, people learn differently, so making multiple options available increases the likelihood that training materials will be used and understood. Depending on the nature of the changes, you may want to supplement initial training with additional tools, such as short modules that cover the basics, online demos with reference documents, question and answer sessions, or contests. You may also choose to offer personal visits or one-on-one training, though this tends to be less cost-effective and require more support from sales managers. Step 5: Deploy and reinforce the program Companies often forget that changes need to be reinforced after the first steps are taken. This is particularly true for insurers trying to change independent agent behavior, because agents have what they see as an easy alternative: ignore the change and sell someone else’s product. Even after agents read briefings or attend training, a lack of support can push them back to previous tools or processes that may feel more comfortable. We suggest carriers consider these steps: 1. Build (and use) feedback loops to hear what field agents think. This starts with thinking through the process to identify persistent questions, issues, or agent dissatisfaction. When you know what people are saying, and you have created a path to escalate this feedback to leadership, for action, you send a critical message to the independent agents: “We value you and your opinion, and we’re listening.” That, by itself, often helps increase engagement. 2. Share success stories. Look for ways to share stories that promote agent wins. By collecting testimonials from influential agents who have made the switch, you can influence others who are on the fence. And if the data on adoption tells a positive story, share that information early and often. 3. Be prepared to see the post- adoption environment for what it is, not what you want it to be. If something isn’t working, acknowledge the issues, and provide information on how the issues are being addressed. When you show that you’re willing to change if necessary, you enhance the agent experience, and you support the development of trust. This helps get more support for the current change, and the one that comes next.
  • 13. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 12 Making the case for change management Communicating the benefits as well as the impact of disruption is important to gaining leadership buy-in. Some organizations find it hard to articulate the benefits of a change management program. Reasons vary: some have a low perception of the activities’ “soft” value, others are overconfident in the quality of the final product, and most have unrealistic expectations for how stakeholders will react. Though soft benefits, such as greater engagement help, are important, decision-makers are often more swayed by demonstrating the potential for disruption. By using a simple impact analysis that shows the likelihood and potential effect of a change on each stakeholder group, managers can show what’s at stake. While there is no perfect “rule of thumb” for change management budgets, we often see investments of 10-15% of a technology program’s overall cost. This can vary by a project’s size and complexity, the maturity of a change management function, whether captive agents are also affected, and likelihood of resistance. Other approaches include making a case by activity (which entails quantifying specific activities), or benefits, (which involves estimating the likelihood and cost of project delays, reduced productivity, or lost business).
  • 14. No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades 13 What this means for your business These are complicated times for the insurance industry. Historically, the sector has relied on independent sales agents who have been responsible for understanding consumer and business needs and recommending insurance products to their customers. But shifts in consumer preferences, demographics, and technology are changing this. Many insurers are now pursuing multi-channel strategies that put them in direct competition with the same independent agents they rely on. As the number and share of market for independent agents declines, the relationship between some carriers and agents may become more adversarial. At the same time, carriers are investing in new technology to capture better data so they can profile their customers better, building more loyal and profitable relationships. And independent agents want carriers to invest in technology, processes, and products, because this helps them deliver quality customer service. How changes are designed and communicated can have far-reaching effects. By following a structured approach for engaging agents early and throughout the change process, insurers can lock in the benefits of the larger program. And, they can help manage some of the more contentious aspects of the agent-carrier relationship in the process. This is the bottom line: when change management is handled poorly, agents are likely to shift their business to other carriers. By involving agents early in the change, seeking feedback, and encouraging collaboration, agents are far more likely to adopt the change and see the carrier as a true partner. For the leading carriers who “get it,” change management is a profitable secret weapon that strengthens the unique relationship between carriers and their independent agents and gives them a competitive edge.
  • 15. www.pwc.com/fsi “No agent left behind: How insurers can rally support for tech upgrades,” PwC, May 2015, www.pwc.com/fsi © 2015 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership. All rights reserved. PwC US refers to the United States member firm, and PwC may refer to either the PwC network of firms or the US member firm. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors. For a deeper conversation, please contact: Debra Mazloff debra.c.mazloff@us.pwc.com (312) 298 5360 https://www.linkedin.com/in/debramazloff Imran Ilyas imran.ilyas@us.pwc.com (312) 298 6884 https://www.linkedin.com/in/imranilyaspwc Christine Goldberg christine.l.goldberg@us.pwc.com (602) 364 8510 https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christine-goldberg/7/29a/b45 Juneen Belknap juneen.belknap@us.pwc.com (407) 236 5102 https://www.linkedin.com/pub/juneen-belknap/0/8aa/54 We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Michael Wellman to this publication. About our Financial Services practice PwC’s people come together with one purpose: to build trust in society and solve important problems. PwC serves multinational financial institutions across banking and capital markets, insurance, asset management, hedge funds, private equity, payments, and financial technology. As a result, PwC has the extensive experience needed to advise on the portfolio of business issues that affect the industry, and we apply that knowledge to our clients’ individual circumstances. We help address business issues from client impact to product design, and from go-to-market strategy to human capital, across all dimensions of the organization. PwC US helps organizations and individuals create the value they’re looking for. We’re a member of the PwC network of firms in 157 countries with more than 195,000 people. We’re committed to delivering quality in assurance, tax, and advisory services. Gain customized access to our insights by downloading our thought leadership app: PwC’s 365™ Advancing business thinking every day. Follow us on Twitter @PwC_US_FinSrvcs A publication of PwC’s Financial Services Institute Marie Carr Principal Cathryn Marsh Director Emily Dunn Senior Manager Kristen Grigorescu Senior Manager