3. The year was 1997, and approximately half of
U.S. households with internet access were
getting it via dial-up service provider
America Online (AOL).
5. Meanwhile, 100% of the kids living in those
households were slowly but surely
becoming addicted to AOL's new, proprietary
messaging program, Instant Messenger.
6. Launched in May of 1997, AIM was part of
the first wave of messaging software that
would revolutionize 1:1 communication in
the late ’90s and early 2000s.
8. The first wave of messaging
introduced the world to the
“user definable online co-
user list” (aka the buddy list),
which made it easier to
communicate with multiple
people 1:1.
9. For example, instead of having to make 5
individual phone calls in order to talk to 5
friends, with AIM you could scan your
buddy list once to see who was available,
and then rattle of messages accordingly.
10. Talking to 5 friends
before instant messaging
Talking to 5 friends
after instant messaging
11. But AIM and its counterparts weren’t
without their limitations. One of the big
ones was mobility: You could only use
these messaging programs on a computer.
And back in the late ’90s that usually
meant a shared family computer.
12. So when cell phones and
Short Message Service
(SMS) text messaging started
gaining traction, first-wave
messaging programs were at
a major disadvantage.
14. In 2000, the first year the Pew Research
Center measured cell phone ownership,
53% of U.S. adults were shown to own cell
phones. Five years later, that figure had
grown to 73%.
15. By 2005, there were 36 million monthly
active SMS texters in the U.S.
16. The main downside of SMS? Its cost. Cellular
service providers typically charge a fee based
on the amount of SMS messages you send and
receive.
(Fast forward to today, and that cost issue has started catching up with
SMS. Revenues from SMS as well as overall SMS usage are in decline.)
17. In the early/mid-2000s, a few companies
cropped up to challenge SMS, and these
companies formed a distinct second wave
of messaging software.
18. During this wave, Skype, Blackberry, and
Google all seized on the opportunity to
deliver more affordable 1:1 messaging at
scale.
(As you’ll see on the next slide, they had varying degrees of success.)
20. While you can think of the second wave of
1:1 messaging software as knocking on
SMS’s door, the third wave of 1:1
messaging software is now actively
breaking that door down.
22. And, in a great example of history being
cyclical, one of the driving forces behind
this third wave of messaging software was,
once again, an evolution in cell phone
technology.
23. This time, it was
smartphones, which had
their first big showing in the
U.S. with the release of the
iPhone in 2007.
24. By 2011, 35% of U.S. adults owned a
smartphone. By 2012, it was 45%, and by
2013, 56%. And yes, that percentage is still
climbing. (It’s up past 68% now.)
25. Smartphones offered a universally simple
way to avoid the cost pitfalls of SMS text
messaging, while simultaneously allowing
for additional features and functionality to
be brought into the world of 1:1 messaging:
apps.
26. Recognizing the potential of messaging
apps for smartphones, companies began
entering the space in droves in the late
2000s/early 2010s.
27. Today, 6 of the top 10 most used apps in
the world are messaging apps (WhatsApp,
Facebook Messenger, LINE, Viber,
KakaoTalk, and WeChat).
28. When we look at the number of monthly
active users these third-wave messaging
apps are attracting, and then look at the
peak numbers those earlier players were
able to yield, there’s really no comparison …
29. The 3 Waves of 1:1
Messaging Software:
Peak Active Users
30. Today’s messaging software landscape is
exponentially larger than it once was.
There aren’t just more companies, there
are billions more users.
31. By the end of this year, eMarketer predicts
that nearly half of smartphone users —
49.3% to be precise — will be using
messaging apps. By 2019, it will be 65%.
32. As marketers, the sheer number of people
flocking to messaging apps should be
enough to get our attention.
33. After all, in order to truly understand our
customers, we need to be hanging out
where they're hanging out and using the
tools that they're using.
34. But what makes messaging apps even
more intriguing are the commerce,
customer support, and advertising
ecosystems developing around them.
35. Last year, for example, Snapchat partnered
with Square on an in-app payment system
called Snapcash.
36. Fashion brand Everlane, meanwhile, started
using Facebook Messenger for sharing order
details and fielding customer questions.
37. Clearly, today’s messaging apps are about
more than simply sending messages. To
quote HubSpot VP of Marketing Meghan
Anderson:
38. “If you think of messaging apps as just another
form of text messaging, you may be missing the
larger picture … We've named WhatsApp and the
like ‘messaging apps’ because that's our current
context for them. They send messages. But what if
the larger story behind messaging apps is not that
they remove barriers to sending messages, but
rather that they remove barriers to all digital
interactions and transactions.”
“
39. Messaging is the next big thing that
businesses will need to understand in
order to grow — and this is exactly what
we're focused on at Drift: Helping
businesses have 1:1 conversations with
their prospects and customers at scale.