Call Girls Chennai Megha 9907093804 Independent Call Girls Service Chennai
SGLT2 inhibitors
1. SGLT-2 Inhibitors
The Game Changer
Ahmed ElBorae, MSc
Assistant lecturer of Cardiology, Cairo University
Specialist of Cardiology, Aswan Heart Centre
2. Agenda
• Mechanism of action
• Cardiovascular prevention
• Heart failure treatment
• Renal protection
• Daily practice guidance
3. 6 types of SGLT
Bhargavan, et al. BMH Medical Journal 2015;2(4):97-101
Brain
Liver
Thyroid
Muscles ,Glucose sensor
4. SGLT-2 Function
• Effect ↓↓ with low glucose level
• Low risk of hypoglycemia
Martin et al. Nature review, Cardiology 2020. doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-0406-8
Normally near 100% of filtrated Glucose is reabsorbed
No Glucose in urine (Renal threshold 180 mg/dl)
With full SGLT-2 blockage
Only 60% excreted
Due to Increased SGLT-1 action
SGLT-2 responsible for reabsorption of 5% of filtrated Na in non-DM, and 15% in DM (Upregulation)
5. SGLT inhibitors evolution
• Phlorizin in 1980s, non-selective (SGLT-1i and SGLT-2i), poor oral
bioavailability
• Currently, four members are licensed by FDA/EMA: (Dapagliflozin,
Empagliflozin, Canagliflozin, and Ertugliflozin)
• Five other>Three (ipragliflozin, luseogliflozin and tofogliflozin)
approved in Japan,(remogliflozin) in India and (Sotagliflozin) in Europe
10 family members
6. Cardiovascular benefits
-Not glycemic control related
-Occurred early after initiation
Same CV benefits in non diabetics
Bhargavan, et al. BMH Medical Journal 2015;2(4):97-101
7. SGLT-2 inhibitors mechanism of action
• ↓Sympathetic tone ?
• ↓ oxidative stress ? (↑ autophagy, Lysosomal activity)
• Anti-Fibrotic?
(↓TGF-B,Fibroblast,Collagen I,III in rats)
• Anti-Inflammatory?
(↓CRP-TNF-IL-6 ,NLRP3 in rats)
• ↓ Ischemia/reperfusion injury “Rat”
(↓ calmodulin kinase II activity)
Verma et al. JAMA cardiology. 2017.
n
250 kcal/day
↓4/2 mmHg
300ml/day 1st then decline
↑ 7% EPO
↓ A/C ratio by 15mg/g
↓TNF
Epicard.
↑K+ channels
↑protein kinase G
↓reabsorption
↓ cellular Ca,Na
30%↑ urinary Na
Mainly interstitial
18. Established CV disease Vs. Having Risk factors only
Only patients with established CV disease showed mortality benefit
Both showed reduction of HFH benefit
Zelniker et al. Lancet 2019; 393: 31–39
19. HFH benefit is consistent irrespective of previous history of heart failure
Zelniker et al. Lancet 2019; 393: 31–39
20. Survival and HF hospitalization benefits
independent of baseline HBA1C or glycemic control
Inzucchi,et al.Circulation. 2018;138:1904–1907.
Post-HOC analysis (EMPAREG trial)
21. Post-HOC analysis (DECLARE TIMI trial)
• Survival benefits in HFrEF
• HF hospitalization benefits Regardless EF
Eri T Kato, et al.Circulation. 2019;139:2528–2536.
34. Voors A A, et al.European Journal of Heart Failure (2020) 22, 713–722
80 patients with acute HF (RCT,Empagliflozin 10mg vs. Placebo)
67% non-DM
Outcome: 1ry: (VAS) dyspnea score, diuretic response(Weight!), change NT-proBNP, and length of stay
2ry: (1)composite of in-hospital worsening HF, re-hospitalization for HF or death at 60 days (2) UOP
• No Significant change in dyspnea, weight, NT-proBNP or length of stay
• Significant ↓HF worsening, HFH, and death at 60 days (Not Powered)
36. SOLOIST-WHF trial
(Sotagliflozin in recently worsened HF +DM)
1222 patients
↓ 33% in composite 1ry endpoint
(Cardiac death-HFH-Urgent HF visits)
Mainly driven by HFH/Visits but not death
B.Pitt et al. NEJM 2021
37. Benefit is persistent regardless EF%
Limitations:
-Small number of HFpEF
-Not powered
-Premature termination (Fund)
38. Agenda
• Mechanism of action
• Cardiovascular prevention
• Heart failure treatment
• Renal protection
• Daily practice guidance
39. Normally initial dip 5 ml/min./mm2
Effect on eGFR
(EMPEROR-Reduced trial)
Zannad et al.circulation. 2021 Jan 26;143(4):310-321
40. Reduction of the composite of worsening of renal function, end-stage renal disease, or renal death independent of baseline eGFR
Zelniker et al. Lancet 2019; 393: 31–39
The lower the baseline eGFR, the lower hypoglycemic effect
due to lower filtrated drug, yet with persistent CV/Renal benefits
41. 34 % ↓ composite of doubling of creatinine, ESKD or renal death
↓ 30%
Perkovik v, et al.nejm.2019, 380;24
47. The CHAMP-HF Registry
Greene ,et al. JACC.2018:351-66
Current gap in GDMT
• Need uptitration
3185 HFrEF patients
150 US centers
% of patients reaching the target dose
• ARNI (14%)
• ACEI/ARB (17%)
• Beta-blocker (28%)
• MRA therapy (77%)
• ACEI+BB+MRA (1%)
48. Advantages of SGLT-2i
• Once daily
• No need for up titration
• Few side effects
Bassi N S, et al. JAMA Cardiology 2020.
Quadruple therapy (ARNI+BB+MRA-SGLT-2i)
Number needed to treat to prevent one death= 3.9
59. Take home message
• SGLT-2i showed significant survival and HF hospitalization benefits in patients with HFrEF ≥
NYHA II with elevated BNP and eGFR ≥ (20-30 ml/min./1.73mm2)
• SGLT-2i benefits is persistent regardless DM status or background HF GDMT
• SGLT2i showed significant reduction of cardiac death in patients with type 2 DM and
established CV disease
• SGLT2i showed significant reduction of HF hospitalization in patients with type 2 DM and
risk factors for CV disease
• SGLT2i showed significant reduction of renal death or progression to ESKD in patients with
type 2 DM and macro albuminuria
(EMPAREG-DECLARE TIMI-CANVAS)
(EMPEROR REDUCED-DAPA HF)
(CREDENCE-DAPA CKD)
(EMPAREG-DECLARE TIMI-CANVAS)