SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 37
AOL-AMERICA
ONLINE
GROUP 12
ARUN KUMAR
NAPOLEON
NIJANTHA KUMAR
PRADEEP S
RAJARAMAN S
SWAMINATHAN G
COMPANY VISION
• Envisioned by Steve Case as a consumer services company, not a technology
company focused on “customer experience”.
• This led to a graphical user interface (GUI) for the service derided by many observers
as the "Internet on training wheels."
• AOL realized early that the overwhelming majority of U.S. consumers wanted their
online service to be easy to use above all else.
• According to Chip Bayers, the mass market appeal and the lack of sophistication is
the “key to AOI’s success”.
• Average AOL user in 1999 spent 544 minutes on the service per day.
Case became the
CEO in 1992.
Main rivals-Prodigy
and CompuServe
1985-company
renamed to quantum
computer services-Q
link online service
COMPANY HISTORY
1983- Steve Case started as
pizza and using “Source”-
joined control video in a
marketing job.
1989-debut of AOL as a
service, for macintosh.
1991-renamed formally
At the end of fiscal year
1992, AOL had 181,000 paid
subscribers less than half
the number of Prodigy
SILVER COASTERS-LAUNCHING INTO THE
FORAY
• In 1994 and 1995, AOL launched a major direct marketing blitz.
• Direct Marketing by AOL.
• A 3 month free trial version with a version of AOL that enabled login.
• 300 million disks and 1 million subscribers by August 1994.
• Emerging threats in 1994 and 1995-ISPs and internet browsers.
• ISPs afforded their users the freedom to browse the World Wide Web for content.
• AOL tried to compete by purchasing Booklink technologies in 1994 and integrated
it with its service..
• While AOL members had easy access to the Internet, chat rooms remained
closed to nonservice members.
FACING NEW THREATS-ISPS AND INTERNET
BROWSERS
• ISPs-fixed price focus ($19.95) a month; AOL-focus on the online experience.
• AOL -“welcome” during login, “You’ve got mail”, the "buddy list" , the "Instant
Message" etc.
• AOL – parental controls.
• February 1992-2 million paid subscribers-average 250,000 new subscribers per
month.
• Market leader and responsible for 30% of internet access.
AOL-FOCUS MORE ON THE EXPERIENCE
“ALL YOU CAN EAT”-THE INITIAL PRICING
• Feb 1996-AOL had 5 million members-but in came a new threat: price
pressure.
• AOL’s subscription fee=Monthly fee($9.95 per month for 5 hours) + Hourly
charge($2.95 in excess of 5 hours per month).
• For moderate users, monthly fee-$30; for heavy users, bill ranged from $100 to
$200.
• ISP Charge-flat fee of $19.95 for a month of unlimited access.
• Another major challenge in March 1996-Microsoft’s switch in price to $19.93 per
month on unlimited basis.
• A new flat rate of $19.99 for unlimited access was set in 1996.
• New joiners: more than1 in the first month of the change; plummeting of traffic
levels.
• In the press, America Online became known as “America On Hold”.
THE REVISED PRICING….AND ITS CHALLENGES
• Advertising, transaction royalties, and
merchandising-contributed >10% of AOL’s first
quarter revenue in 1996-with advertising as a
large revenue source.
• By 2000, 60 to 70 percent of AOL’s revenue
came from members.
• Most observers expected that percentage to
decrease as access increasingly became a
commodity.
EFFECT OF NEW CHANGES IN PRICING
• On the cost side, the industry had three primary expense categories:
• (1) Telecommunications, (2) Customer Acquisition, and (3) Content Royalties.
• Telecommunications expenses:
 Substantial in the industry.
• Customer acquisition :
 Increasingly more expensive due to competition.
• Content royalties:
 Traditionally amounted to 15% to 30% of overall revenues in aggregate.
EVOLUTION OF STRATEGY
• AOL launched the “Greenhouse Program”-the company took equity stakes in over 50 start-up
studios.
• AOL-did investment and provided support to these studios.
• Early 1996-AOL had 23 greenhouse services running; planned to have over 100 by June 1996.
• This success of Motley Fool led to perusal of other programs.
THE GREENHOUSE PROGRAM
• President of AOL services-Ted Leonsis, directed greenhouse services.
• Increase in membership: tenfold; revenues jumped from less than $100 million to more than $1.5
billion.
• AOL downplayed the importance of its relationships with traditional media companies.
• Lost some content to major companies-NBC content to Microsoft and Time Warner content to
CompuServe-but that didn’t deter them.
• 1996-Leonsis became president of a new division called AOL Studios to focus on content
creation.
DOWNPLAYING TRADITIONAL SERVICES…
• In 1996-enter Bob Pittman, founder of MTV, to run AOL’s day-to-day operations while Case
stayed on as company CEO, focusing on corporate strategy and product development.
• Two goals for AOL: to make the company profitable and to make AOL one of the leading
brands in the world.
• Customer acquisition costs-reduced from $375 to $90.31.
• Focus was given more in solving network traffic problems and in settling lawsuits.
• New strategy in February 1996-scaling back developing and producing entertainment and
used content providers to pay for carriage.
….AND ENTER NEW LEADERSHIP, NEW STRATEGIES
AOL PARTNERSHIP DEALS
• Partnership deals - Pittman with providers and advertisers involved a
combination of cash payments & cross-marketing provided to AOL.
• This was provided in exchange for carriages on the AOL Service and a
guaranteed number of impressions by AOL users.
• Price tag associated with a particular deal was determined by a number of
factors:
• The level of exclusivity on AOL
• The areas in which placement was guaranteed on AOL
• The AOL brands on which a content partner gained carriage
AOL PARTNERSHIP DEALS
CONTD…
• Four types of partnership deals with AOL:
• Anchor tenancy: Each of AOL’s 18 channels had up to 4 anchor tenants with fixed
placements on their respective pages.
• Exclusive provider: USA ($500 million) & Barnes&Noble ($100 million) paid for its exclusive
relationship with AOL.
• Primary provider: An AOL primary provider was the featured provider in a particular space;
eToys ($18 million) & Preview Travel ($32 million) paid to be primary commerce provider of
toys on AOL.
• Premier provider: Included a combination of Anchor Tenancy, some exclusive content, and
multi-faceted placement and promotion; In 1999 CBS MarketWatch ($21 million) & Electronic
Arts (EA) ($81 million) paid AOL.
PARTNERSHIPS/ACQUISITIONS
• In 1990s, AOL had established strategic alliances with dozens of companies including
Time Warner, ABC,, Tribune, Hachette, IBM, American Express, etc…
• This is to provide content, distribution, and the latest technology to its users.
• Early 1996 - Alliances with Microsoft and AT&T.
• AOL made Microsoft’s Explorer their featured Internet browser in exchange for an
AOL icon in every copy of Windows 95.
• AOL and AT&T alliance- to offer a link to AOL from its WorldNet Internet access
service providing AOL with potential access to AT&T’s 80 million customers.
• In 1999, AOL purchased Netscape Communications at a price of about $10 billion in
stock.
INTERNATIONAL
• In fiscal year 1999, AOL International topped with 3 million members outside the
United States.
• In 1999/2000, AOL partnered with Mexico’s Cisneros group to launch AOL Latin
America services in Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina.
• The company also launched AOL Japan and AOL Australia, and made a strategic
investment in China.com.
• This is to strengthen AOL’s role in that region and to set the stage for the launch
of AOL Hong Kong in 2000.
• By August 2000, AOL operated in seventeen countries worldwide
TIME WARNER
• In 2000, Time Warner was the world’s largest media company.
• It published and distributed books and magazines, recorded music, movie
and television programs.
• Owned and operated retail stores, Cable TV systems.
• Owned and administered music copyrights.
• The company owned 75 percent of Time Warner Entertainment which was
comprised of Warner Bros., Time Warner Cable and several other
entertainment holdings.
TIME WARNER’S BUSINESSES
• Cable Networks
• Publishing
• Music
• Filmed Entertainment
• Cable Systems
TIME WARNER’S BUSINESSES
Cable Networks:
• TBS Entertainment: The Turner entertainment networks housing TBS Superstation, TNT,
Cartoon Network, Turner Classic Movies, and the new Turner South.
• CNN News Group: CNN featured more than 77 million U.S. subscribers and over 600
news affiliates in the United States and Canada.
• Home Box Office: This division featured both HBO and Cinemax, with 35.7 million
subscribers in the United States and 10 branded channels.
Publishing:
Time Inc., featured thirty-six magazines with a total of 130 million
readers.
TIME WARNER’S BUSINESSES
Music:
• Warner Music International, Atlantic, Elektra, Rhino, Sire, Warner Bros.
• The Group had thirty-eight of the top 200 US albums in 1999 and owned 1 million music
copyrights.
Filmed Entertainment:
• Warner Bros. owned 5,700 feature films, 32,000 television titles, and 13,500 animated titles,
including 1,500 classic cartoons.
• New Line Cinema produced four of 1998’s top twenty-five box-office hits.
Cable systems:
• Time Warner Cable featured the Road Runner high-speed online service.
• Time Warner cable had more than 12.6 million customers and passed 21.3 million homes.
CROSS-PROMOTION
• Time inc and warner bros merged in 1989 which brings together in
the media platform and also to promote each other.
• Time warner failed to exploit its strategy of leveraging the media
assets until acquisition of tuner broadcasting systems in 1996.
• Tuner asset is considered as third side of the triangle.
• Main complaint-time and warner did not make much of their merger a decade ago.
• Main competitors:
 MSN network, investing $1 billion in Comcast and $5 billion in AT&T.
 Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. which had structured itself around a future in which consumers
would demand wireless Web access and interactive TV.
 Sony, with the main unifying asset being video games and also a major part of their revenue.
 Viacom, which became even more expansive after its merger with CBS.
 General Electric: With MSNBC, CNBC, and NBC, General Electric, which earned $100 billionin
1998 revenue.
 AT&T was the largest telecom company in the United States, with more than 80 million
customers.
OTHER PLAYERS IN THE SYSTEM
WARNER’S EARLIER EFFORT ON INTERNET
• Launch of pathfinder in 1994, a portal to its various media properties.
• Due to the problem arising in the pathfinder and the site is dropped in may 1999.
• Company also spent $15 million dollar on the portal.
• By changing the internet strategy to emphasize 5 vertical hub websites.
• The launch of entertainment hub called “entertaindom”.
• At February ,the website also ranked 664 in overall and 66 in the entertainment
category due to this issue the top management is changed and some executives
were forced out.
MERGER
• On January 10, 2000,
• $165 billion merger.
MERGER( CONTINUED)
• Within 5 weeks -2 companies - lost almost $50billion of market
capitalization.
• Reminiscent of Barry Diller's failed $22 billion attempt to merge his USA
networks with the internet portal Lycos.
• Disney’s struggle to convince investors of the value of its $1.6 billion
acquisition of internet portal Infoseek.
• Convergence of old and new media:
• Combination of hitherto separate Internet Service Providers (ISPs),
portals, and content providers, and that AOL was uniquely suited to
lead this convergence.
CONDUIT VS CONDUCT
• In 2000, growth outlook cable network industry – good.
• In 1999, total cable network revenues $24 compared to the $16 broadcast
network advertising
• Reason for the merger may have been plumbing rather than programming.
• Time Warner’s cable properties would give AOL control of valuable
broadband distribution assets.
• AOL -lack of broadband distribution capability.
CONDUIT VS CONDUCT
CONTD
• AOL needed fast, inexpensive connections to its customers to
remain competitive as broadband delivery increased in
popularity.
• Most vocal opponents to merger - The Walt Disney Company.
• Disney feared that AOL, acting as a broadband gatekeeper,
could choke off access to Disney’s crown jewels⎯ its content.
• NBC, General Electric, joined Disney.
NOW A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR
• Advertising and e-commerce lifeblood of the merged AOL Time Warner.
• Revenue increased by 23 % at Time Warner-Q2, 2000.
• During AOL’s Q4 2000 ending June 30, revenues increased more than 80
percent from the previous year
CALLING AOL
• Series of acquisitions - easy to access the service via any medium.
• AOL enabled access to its service (DSLs, announcing alliances with GTE,
Ameritech Communications, and Bell Atlantic, (ADSL) service to subscribers.
• Voice service (VoIP).
• 5.4 % stake in Internet telephony company Net2Phone .
• 10 % stake in Palm.com
CALLING AOL
CONTD
• AIM, ICQ and Buddy Lists made the company telecommunications
player.
• ICQ had 62.4 million registered users - average of 75 minutes per day.
• AOL's AIM and ICQ software - 130 million users.
• Not allowing other ISPs to link to its ICQ system brought charges of
anticompetitive behaviour from ISPs.
• Attention from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
CALLING AOL
CONTD
• Competitors Microsoft and AT&T iCast and Tribal Voice criticized
AOL for its refusal to allow people using other products to trade IM
with its users.
• AOL tried to block competition.
• Renewed urgency for AOL
• Reviewing the Time Warner deal.
REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY
• Regulatory issues.
• Open access.
• Potential reclassification of internet over cable lines as a
telecommunications service.
• U.S. Circuit court of appeals -internet service over cable should be
classified ⎯ and potentially regulated by the fcc⎯as a form of
telecommunications service.
• Telecommunications services were regulated as "common carriers,"
forbidden from discrimination.
• Cable providers-allowed companies to select which channels their
customer receive.
REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY
CONTD
• Legal battles between ISPs and cable operators.
• Creating substantial uncertainty for investors and consumers.
• FCC Chairman William Kennard said
“the FCC might decide to conduct its own proceeding to reclassify
Internet service over cable as something other than a
telecommunications service or the agency might adopt the court's
classification but exempt such service from telecom rules.”
CONCLUSION
• After the merger was announced, the key roles were already determined.
• CEO -Gerald Levin.
• Bob Pittman, AOL’s President and COO , co-COO role with Time Warner’s President, Dick
Parsons.
• Pittman-subscription, advertising, and commerce businesses.
• Parsons-run content from film, television production, music, and books.
• Ted Turner, Time Warner’s Vice Chairman-Senior Advisor.
CONCLUSION
“The merger tested the ability of AOL (an Internet pure play with 12,000 employees) to
make something greater than AOL and Time Warner (a 67,000-employee traditional
media conglomerate would otherwise produce independently.”
• AOL has evolved from an Internet Service Provider (ISP) to control a wide variety of
Internet and media assets including vast content arms (e.g. Time Magazine),
broadcasters (e.g. CNN) and cable systems.
• The business models sustaining many of AOL Time Warner’s assets are fundamentally
different from that of an ISP.
QUESTIONS
• The skill sets needed to manage the conglomeration are very diverse.
• Was it necessary to bring these assets under one firm?
• How can AOL Time Warner incorporate these assets to create something greater
than if ownership of the two companies stayed separate?

More Related Content

What's hot

'Radio: Last.fm Is Not The Problem' by Grant Goddard
'Radio: Last.fm Is Not The Problem' by Grant Goddard'Radio: Last.fm Is Not The Problem' by Grant Goddard
'Radio: Last.fm Is Not The Problem' by Grant GoddardGrant Goddard
 
Presentation Global Collect Perspectives 2012
Presentation Global Collect Perspectives 2012Presentation Global Collect Perspectives 2012
Presentation Global Collect Perspectives 2012Blockchain News
 
M Connect Only2
M Connect Only2M Connect Only2
M Connect Only2hoganfred
 
Time Warner Cable Strategy written report
Time Warner Cable Strategy written reportTime Warner Cable Strategy written report
Time Warner Cable Strategy written reportDavid Green
 
Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in the production and exchange o...
Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in the production and exchange o...Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in the production and exchange o...
Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in the production and exchange o...aquinasmedia
 
'Privatising Radios One And Two: How To Kill Commercial Radio With Kindness' ...
'Privatising Radios One And Two: How To Kill Commercial Radio With Kindness' ...'Privatising Radios One And Two: How To Kill Commercial Radio With Kindness' ...
'Privatising Radios One And Two: How To Kill Commercial Radio With Kindness' ...Grant Goddard
 
1.ownership and structure of media
1.ownership and structure of media1.ownership and structure of media
1.ownership and structure of mediaAdamPatersonMedia
 

What's hot (11)

'Radio: Last.fm Is Not The Problem' by Grant Goddard
'Radio: Last.fm Is Not The Problem' by Grant Goddard'Radio: Last.fm Is Not The Problem' by Grant Goddard
'Radio: Last.fm Is Not The Problem' by Grant Goddard
 
Presentation Global Collect Perspectives 2012
Presentation Global Collect Perspectives 2012Presentation Global Collect Perspectives 2012
Presentation Global Collect Perspectives 2012
 
M Connect Only2
M Connect Only2M Connect Only2
M Connect Only2
 
Time Warner Cable Strategy written report
Time Warner Cable Strategy written reportTime Warner Cable Strategy written report
Time Warner Cable Strategy written report
 
Musings_CLSARoadshows
Musings_CLSARoadshowsMusings_CLSARoadshows
Musings_CLSARoadshows
 
Sectors of the media sectors
Sectors of the media sectorsSectors of the media sectors
Sectors of the media sectors
 
Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in the production and exchange o...
Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in the production and exchange o...Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in the production and exchange o...
Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in the production and exchange o...
 
'Privatising Radios One And Two: How To Kill Commercial Radio With Kindness' ...
'Privatising Radios One And Two: How To Kill Commercial Radio With Kindness' ...'Privatising Radios One And Two: How To Kill Commercial Radio With Kindness' ...
'Privatising Radios One And Two: How To Kill Commercial Radio With Kindness' ...
 
1.ownership and structure of media
1.ownership and structure of media1.ownership and structure of media
1.ownership and structure of media
 
The Power Of Radio
The Power Of RadioThe Power Of Radio
The Power Of Radio
 
Azera Powerpoint
Azera PowerpointAzera Powerpoint
Azera Powerpoint
 

Similar to AOL-Time Warner Merger Creates Internet Media Giant

AOL Time Warner Merger Case Study
AOL Time Warner Merger Case StudyAOL Time Warner Merger Case Study
AOL Time Warner Merger Case StudyAdham Ghaly
 
Aol time warner merger
Aol time warner mergerAol time warner merger
Aol time warner mergerWaqar Ahmad
 
AOL - Time Warner Merger And Its Failure
AOL - Time Warner Merger And Its FailureAOL - Time Warner Merger And Its Failure
AOL - Time Warner Merger And Its FailureVivek Vadakkuppattu
 
Com110 chapter 6
Com110 chapter 6Com110 chapter 6
Com110 chapter 6Val Bello
 
Unit 25 assignment 1
Unit 25 assignment 1Unit 25 assignment 1
Unit 25 assignment 1Vianello1
 
Unit 25 assignment 1 Outline
Unit 25 assignment 1 OutlineUnit 25 assignment 1 Outline
Unit 25 assignment 1 OutlineVianello1
 
Global media group_20102665+hwang_jeonghwa
Global media group_20102665+hwang_jeonghwaGlobal media group_20102665+hwang_jeonghwa
Global media group_20102665+hwang_jeonghwaHwang Jeonghwa
 
walt disney_CPM 21-22.ppt
walt disney_CPM 21-22.pptwalt disney_CPM 21-22.ppt
walt disney_CPM 21-22.pptVINEETRANJAN23
 
U8 A1 powerpoint
U8 A1 powerpointU8 A1 powerpoint
U8 A1 powerpointdgordonfilm
 
Data Con LA 2018 - How is Blockchain Changing Relationships in Entertainment ...
Data Con LA 2018 - How is Blockchain Changing Relationships in Entertainment ...Data Con LA 2018 - How is Blockchain Changing Relationships in Entertainment ...
Data Con LA 2018 - How is Blockchain Changing Relationships in Entertainment ...Data Con LA
 
G322 Film Industry Revision
G322 Film Industry RevisionG322 Film Industry Revision
G322 Film Industry Revisionegregson
 
Contextual Studies Week 1
Contextual Studies Week 1Contextual Studies Week 1
Contextual Studies Week 1Marc Atkinson
 
G322 film industry revision
G322 film industry revisionG322 film industry revision
G322 film industry revisionroedogg71
 
The Warner Media (Media Conglomerate)
The Warner Media (Media Conglomerate)The Warner Media (Media Conglomerate)
The Warner Media (Media Conglomerate)Zaibunnisa73
 

Similar to AOL-Time Warner Merger Creates Internet Media Giant (20)

AOL Time Warner Merger Case Study
AOL Time Warner Merger Case StudyAOL Time Warner Merger Case Study
AOL Time Warner Merger Case Study
 
Aol time warner merger
Aol time warner mergerAol time warner merger
Aol time warner merger
 
American online
American onlineAmerican online
American online
 
AOL - Time Warner Merger And Its Failure
AOL - Time Warner Merger And Its FailureAOL - Time Warner Merger And Its Failure
AOL - Time Warner Merger And Its Failure
 
Com110 chapter 6
Com110 chapter 6Com110 chapter 6
Com110 chapter 6
 
Unit 25 assignment 1
Unit 25 assignment 1Unit 25 assignment 1
Unit 25 assignment 1
 
Unit 25 assignment 1 Outline
Unit 25 assignment 1 OutlineUnit 25 assignment 1 Outline
Unit 25 assignment 1 Outline
 
Muskan ppt.pptx
Muskan ppt.pptxMuskan ppt.pptx
Muskan ppt.pptx
 
Global media group_20102665+hwang_jeonghwa
Global media group_20102665+hwang_jeonghwaGlobal media group_20102665+hwang_jeonghwa
Global media group_20102665+hwang_jeonghwa
 
Media Ethics and Economics
Media Ethics and EconomicsMedia Ethics and Economics
Media Ethics and Economics
 
walt disney_CPM 21-22.ppt
walt disney_CPM 21-22.pptwalt disney_CPM 21-22.ppt
walt disney_CPM 21-22.ppt
 
U8 A1 powerpoint
U8 A1 powerpointU8 A1 powerpoint
U8 A1 powerpoint
 
Data Con LA 2018 - How is Blockchain Changing Relationships in Entertainment ...
Data Con LA 2018 - How is Blockchain Changing Relationships in Entertainment ...Data Con LA 2018 - How is Blockchain Changing Relationships in Entertainment ...
Data Con LA 2018 - How is Blockchain Changing Relationships in Entertainment ...
 
G322 film industry revision1
G322 film industry revision1G322 film industry revision1
G322 film industry revision1
 
G322 Film Industry Revision
G322 Film Industry RevisionG322 Film Industry Revision
G322 Film Industry Revision
 
Contextual Studies Week 1
Contextual Studies Week 1Contextual Studies Week 1
Contextual Studies Week 1
 
PhilaU Immersion Program
PhilaU Immersion ProgramPhilaU Immersion Program
PhilaU Immersion Program
 
G322 film industry revision
G322 film industry revisionG322 film industry revision
G322 film industry revision
 
Film Industry
Film IndustryFilm Industry
Film Industry
 
The Warner Media (Media Conglomerate)
The Warner Media (Media Conglomerate)The Warner Media (Media Conglomerate)
The Warner Media (Media Conglomerate)
 

Recently uploaded

Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designMIPLM
 
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfSpandanaRallapalli
 
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayQuarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayMakMakNepo
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
Atmosphere science 7 quarter 4 .........
Atmosphere science 7 quarter 4 .........Atmosphere science 7 quarter 4 .........
Atmosphere science 7 quarter 4 .........LeaCamillePacle
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...JhezDiaz1
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxAnupkumar Sharma
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxOH TEIK BIN
 
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxGrade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxChelloAnnAsuncion2
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptxJudging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptxSherlyMaeNeri
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
 
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
 
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayQuarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
Atmosphere science 7 quarter 4 .........
Atmosphere science 7 quarter 4 .........Atmosphere science 7 quarter 4 .........
Atmosphere science 7 quarter 4 .........
 
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxGrade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptxJudging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
 

AOL-Time Warner Merger Creates Internet Media Giant

  • 1. AOL-AMERICA ONLINE GROUP 12 ARUN KUMAR NAPOLEON NIJANTHA KUMAR PRADEEP S RAJARAMAN S SWAMINATHAN G
  • 2. COMPANY VISION • Envisioned by Steve Case as a consumer services company, not a technology company focused on “customer experience”. • This led to a graphical user interface (GUI) for the service derided by many observers as the "Internet on training wheels." • AOL realized early that the overwhelming majority of U.S. consumers wanted their online service to be easy to use above all else. • According to Chip Bayers, the mass market appeal and the lack of sophistication is the “key to AOI’s success”. • Average AOL user in 1999 spent 544 minutes on the service per day.
  • 3. Case became the CEO in 1992. Main rivals-Prodigy and CompuServe 1985-company renamed to quantum computer services-Q link online service COMPANY HISTORY 1983- Steve Case started as pizza and using “Source”- joined control video in a marketing job. 1989-debut of AOL as a service, for macintosh. 1991-renamed formally At the end of fiscal year 1992, AOL had 181,000 paid subscribers less than half the number of Prodigy
  • 4. SILVER COASTERS-LAUNCHING INTO THE FORAY • In 1994 and 1995, AOL launched a major direct marketing blitz. • Direct Marketing by AOL. • A 3 month free trial version with a version of AOL that enabled login. • 300 million disks and 1 million subscribers by August 1994.
  • 5. • Emerging threats in 1994 and 1995-ISPs and internet browsers. • ISPs afforded their users the freedom to browse the World Wide Web for content. • AOL tried to compete by purchasing Booklink technologies in 1994 and integrated it with its service.. • While AOL members had easy access to the Internet, chat rooms remained closed to nonservice members. FACING NEW THREATS-ISPS AND INTERNET BROWSERS
  • 6. • ISPs-fixed price focus ($19.95) a month; AOL-focus on the online experience. • AOL -“welcome” during login, “You’ve got mail”, the "buddy list" , the "Instant Message" etc. • AOL – parental controls. • February 1992-2 million paid subscribers-average 250,000 new subscribers per month. • Market leader and responsible for 30% of internet access. AOL-FOCUS MORE ON THE EXPERIENCE
  • 7. “ALL YOU CAN EAT”-THE INITIAL PRICING • Feb 1996-AOL had 5 million members-but in came a new threat: price pressure. • AOL’s subscription fee=Monthly fee($9.95 per month for 5 hours) + Hourly charge($2.95 in excess of 5 hours per month). • For moderate users, monthly fee-$30; for heavy users, bill ranged from $100 to $200. • ISP Charge-flat fee of $19.95 for a month of unlimited access. • Another major challenge in March 1996-Microsoft’s switch in price to $19.93 per month on unlimited basis.
  • 8. • A new flat rate of $19.99 for unlimited access was set in 1996. • New joiners: more than1 in the first month of the change; plummeting of traffic levels. • In the press, America Online became known as “America On Hold”. THE REVISED PRICING….AND ITS CHALLENGES
  • 9. • Advertising, transaction royalties, and merchandising-contributed >10% of AOL’s first quarter revenue in 1996-with advertising as a large revenue source. • By 2000, 60 to 70 percent of AOL’s revenue came from members. • Most observers expected that percentage to decrease as access increasingly became a commodity. EFFECT OF NEW CHANGES IN PRICING
  • 10. • On the cost side, the industry had three primary expense categories: • (1) Telecommunications, (2) Customer Acquisition, and (3) Content Royalties. • Telecommunications expenses:  Substantial in the industry. • Customer acquisition :  Increasingly more expensive due to competition. • Content royalties:  Traditionally amounted to 15% to 30% of overall revenues in aggregate. EVOLUTION OF STRATEGY
  • 11. • AOL launched the “Greenhouse Program”-the company took equity stakes in over 50 start-up studios. • AOL-did investment and provided support to these studios. • Early 1996-AOL had 23 greenhouse services running; planned to have over 100 by June 1996. • This success of Motley Fool led to perusal of other programs. THE GREENHOUSE PROGRAM
  • 12. • President of AOL services-Ted Leonsis, directed greenhouse services. • Increase in membership: tenfold; revenues jumped from less than $100 million to more than $1.5 billion. • AOL downplayed the importance of its relationships with traditional media companies. • Lost some content to major companies-NBC content to Microsoft and Time Warner content to CompuServe-but that didn’t deter them. • 1996-Leonsis became president of a new division called AOL Studios to focus on content creation. DOWNPLAYING TRADITIONAL SERVICES…
  • 13. • In 1996-enter Bob Pittman, founder of MTV, to run AOL’s day-to-day operations while Case stayed on as company CEO, focusing on corporate strategy and product development. • Two goals for AOL: to make the company profitable and to make AOL one of the leading brands in the world. • Customer acquisition costs-reduced from $375 to $90.31. • Focus was given more in solving network traffic problems and in settling lawsuits. • New strategy in February 1996-scaling back developing and producing entertainment and used content providers to pay for carriage. ….AND ENTER NEW LEADERSHIP, NEW STRATEGIES
  • 14. AOL PARTNERSHIP DEALS • Partnership deals - Pittman with providers and advertisers involved a combination of cash payments & cross-marketing provided to AOL. • This was provided in exchange for carriages on the AOL Service and a guaranteed number of impressions by AOL users. • Price tag associated with a particular deal was determined by a number of factors: • The level of exclusivity on AOL • The areas in which placement was guaranteed on AOL • The AOL brands on which a content partner gained carriage
  • 15. AOL PARTNERSHIP DEALS CONTD… • Four types of partnership deals with AOL: • Anchor tenancy: Each of AOL’s 18 channels had up to 4 anchor tenants with fixed placements on their respective pages. • Exclusive provider: USA ($500 million) & Barnes&Noble ($100 million) paid for its exclusive relationship with AOL. • Primary provider: An AOL primary provider was the featured provider in a particular space; eToys ($18 million) & Preview Travel ($32 million) paid to be primary commerce provider of toys on AOL. • Premier provider: Included a combination of Anchor Tenancy, some exclusive content, and multi-faceted placement and promotion; In 1999 CBS MarketWatch ($21 million) & Electronic Arts (EA) ($81 million) paid AOL.
  • 16. PARTNERSHIPS/ACQUISITIONS • In 1990s, AOL had established strategic alliances with dozens of companies including Time Warner, ABC,, Tribune, Hachette, IBM, American Express, etc… • This is to provide content, distribution, and the latest technology to its users. • Early 1996 - Alliances with Microsoft and AT&T. • AOL made Microsoft’s Explorer their featured Internet browser in exchange for an AOL icon in every copy of Windows 95. • AOL and AT&T alliance- to offer a link to AOL from its WorldNet Internet access service providing AOL with potential access to AT&T’s 80 million customers. • In 1999, AOL purchased Netscape Communications at a price of about $10 billion in stock.
  • 17. INTERNATIONAL • In fiscal year 1999, AOL International topped with 3 million members outside the United States. • In 1999/2000, AOL partnered with Mexico’s Cisneros group to launch AOL Latin America services in Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina. • The company also launched AOL Japan and AOL Australia, and made a strategic investment in China.com. • This is to strengthen AOL’s role in that region and to set the stage for the launch of AOL Hong Kong in 2000. • By August 2000, AOL operated in seventeen countries worldwide
  • 18. TIME WARNER • In 2000, Time Warner was the world’s largest media company. • It published and distributed books and magazines, recorded music, movie and television programs. • Owned and operated retail stores, Cable TV systems. • Owned and administered music copyrights. • The company owned 75 percent of Time Warner Entertainment which was comprised of Warner Bros., Time Warner Cable and several other entertainment holdings.
  • 19. TIME WARNER’S BUSINESSES • Cable Networks • Publishing • Music • Filmed Entertainment • Cable Systems
  • 20. TIME WARNER’S BUSINESSES Cable Networks: • TBS Entertainment: The Turner entertainment networks housing TBS Superstation, TNT, Cartoon Network, Turner Classic Movies, and the new Turner South. • CNN News Group: CNN featured more than 77 million U.S. subscribers and over 600 news affiliates in the United States and Canada. • Home Box Office: This division featured both HBO and Cinemax, with 35.7 million subscribers in the United States and 10 branded channels. Publishing: Time Inc., featured thirty-six magazines with a total of 130 million readers.
  • 21. TIME WARNER’S BUSINESSES Music: • Warner Music International, Atlantic, Elektra, Rhino, Sire, Warner Bros. • The Group had thirty-eight of the top 200 US albums in 1999 and owned 1 million music copyrights. Filmed Entertainment: • Warner Bros. owned 5,700 feature films, 32,000 television titles, and 13,500 animated titles, including 1,500 classic cartoons. • New Line Cinema produced four of 1998’s top twenty-five box-office hits. Cable systems: • Time Warner Cable featured the Road Runner high-speed online service. • Time Warner cable had more than 12.6 million customers and passed 21.3 million homes.
  • 22. CROSS-PROMOTION • Time inc and warner bros merged in 1989 which brings together in the media platform and also to promote each other. • Time warner failed to exploit its strategy of leveraging the media assets until acquisition of tuner broadcasting systems in 1996. • Tuner asset is considered as third side of the triangle.
  • 23. • Main complaint-time and warner did not make much of their merger a decade ago. • Main competitors:  MSN network, investing $1 billion in Comcast and $5 billion in AT&T.  Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. which had structured itself around a future in which consumers would demand wireless Web access and interactive TV.  Sony, with the main unifying asset being video games and also a major part of their revenue.  Viacom, which became even more expansive after its merger with CBS.  General Electric: With MSNBC, CNBC, and NBC, General Electric, which earned $100 billionin 1998 revenue.  AT&T was the largest telecom company in the United States, with more than 80 million customers. OTHER PLAYERS IN THE SYSTEM
  • 24. WARNER’S EARLIER EFFORT ON INTERNET • Launch of pathfinder in 1994, a portal to its various media properties. • Due to the problem arising in the pathfinder and the site is dropped in may 1999. • Company also spent $15 million dollar on the portal. • By changing the internet strategy to emphasize 5 vertical hub websites. • The launch of entertainment hub called “entertaindom”. • At February ,the website also ranked 664 in overall and 66 in the entertainment category due to this issue the top management is changed and some executives were forced out.
  • 25. MERGER • On January 10, 2000, • $165 billion merger.
  • 26. MERGER( CONTINUED) • Within 5 weeks -2 companies - lost almost $50billion of market capitalization. • Reminiscent of Barry Diller's failed $22 billion attempt to merge his USA networks with the internet portal Lycos. • Disney’s struggle to convince investors of the value of its $1.6 billion acquisition of internet portal Infoseek. • Convergence of old and new media: • Combination of hitherto separate Internet Service Providers (ISPs), portals, and content providers, and that AOL was uniquely suited to lead this convergence.
  • 27. CONDUIT VS CONDUCT • In 2000, growth outlook cable network industry – good. • In 1999, total cable network revenues $24 compared to the $16 broadcast network advertising • Reason for the merger may have been plumbing rather than programming. • Time Warner’s cable properties would give AOL control of valuable broadband distribution assets. • AOL -lack of broadband distribution capability.
  • 28. CONDUIT VS CONDUCT CONTD • AOL needed fast, inexpensive connections to its customers to remain competitive as broadband delivery increased in popularity. • Most vocal opponents to merger - The Walt Disney Company. • Disney feared that AOL, acting as a broadband gatekeeper, could choke off access to Disney’s crown jewels⎯ its content. • NBC, General Electric, joined Disney.
  • 29. NOW A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR • Advertising and e-commerce lifeblood of the merged AOL Time Warner. • Revenue increased by 23 % at Time Warner-Q2, 2000. • During AOL’s Q4 2000 ending June 30, revenues increased more than 80 percent from the previous year
  • 30. CALLING AOL • Series of acquisitions - easy to access the service via any medium. • AOL enabled access to its service (DSLs, announcing alliances with GTE, Ameritech Communications, and Bell Atlantic, (ADSL) service to subscribers. • Voice service (VoIP). • 5.4 % stake in Internet telephony company Net2Phone . • 10 % stake in Palm.com
  • 31. CALLING AOL CONTD • AIM, ICQ and Buddy Lists made the company telecommunications player. • ICQ had 62.4 million registered users - average of 75 minutes per day. • AOL's AIM and ICQ software - 130 million users. • Not allowing other ISPs to link to its ICQ system brought charges of anticompetitive behaviour from ISPs. • Attention from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
  • 32. CALLING AOL CONTD • Competitors Microsoft and AT&T iCast and Tribal Voice criticized AOL for its refusal to allow people using other products to trade IM with its users. • AOL tried to block competition. • Renewed urgency for AOL • Reviewing the Time Warner deal.
  • 33. REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY • Regulatory issues. • Open access. • Potential reclassification of internet over cable lines as a telecommunications service. • U.S. Circuit court of appeals -internet service over cable should be classified ⎯ and potentially regulated by the fcc⎯as a form of telecommunications service. • Telecommunications services were regulated as "common carriers," forbidden from discrimination. • Cable providers-allowed companies to select which channels their customer receive.
  • 34. REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY CONTD • Legal battles between ISPs and cable operators. • Creating substantial uncertainty for investors and consumers. • FCC Chairman William Kennard said “the FCC might decide to conduct its own proceeding to reclassify Internet service over cable as something other than a telecommunications service or the agency might adopt the court's classification but exempt such service from telecom rules.”
  • 35. CONCLUSION • After the merger was announced, the key roles were already determined. • CEO -Gerald Levin. • Bob Pittman, AOL’s President and COO , co-COO role with Time Warner’s President, Dick Parsons. • Pittman-subscription, advertising, and commerce businesses. • Parsons-run content from film, television production, music, and books. • Ted Turner, Time Warner’s Vice Chairman-Senior Advisor.
  • 36. CONCLUSION “The merger tested the ability of AOL (an Internet pure play with 12,000 employees) to make something greater than AOL and Time Warner (a 67,000-employee traditional media conglomerate would otherwise produce independently.” • AOL has evolved from an Internet Service Provider (ISP) to control a wide variety of Internet and media assets including vast content arms (e.g. Time Magazine), broadcasters (e.g. CNN) and cable systems. • The business models sustaining many of AOL Time Warner’s assets are fundamentally different from that of an ISP.
  • 37. QUESTIONS • The skill sets needed to manage the conglomeration are very diverse. • Was it necessary to bring these assets under one firm? • How can AOL Time Warner incorporate these assets to create something greater than if ownership of the two companies stayed separate?